Intranasal Ketorolac Versus Intravenous Ketorolac for Treatment of Migraine Headaches in Children
NCT ID: NCT02358681
Last Updated: 2022-01-12
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
59 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2015-06-16
2021-03-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The intranasal (IN) route is a painless and effective way of administering analgesics, including ketorolac: IN ketorolac has been shown to be an effective analgesic in adults for painful conditions, including acute migraine headaches. However, IN ketorolac has been understudied in children, and it is not known how effective it is compared to IV ketorolac, which is currently the most common way of administering ketorolac to children. If IN ketorolac is shown to be no less effective than IV ketorolac, IN ketorolac may be a viable and painless alternative to effectively treat acute migraine headaches in children.
Therefore, our primary aim is to demonstrate that IN ketorolac is non-inferior to IV ketorolac for reducing pain in children with acute migraine headaches.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Intranasal Lidocaine to Treat Pediatric Migraine in the Emergency Department
NCT03576820
Efficacy and Safety of Intranasal Ketorolac for the Acute Treatment of Migraine
NCT00483717
A Pilot Clinical Trial of a New Neuromodulation Device for Acute Attacks of Migraine in Children and Adolescents
NCT05102591
Ketamine v. Ketorolac for Management of Generalized Tension Type Headache
NCT03221569
Metoclopramide Versus Ketorolac for Tension-type Headache
NCT01011673
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Secondary Aim: Determine whether there is a difference in time to achieve a clinically significant reduction in pain after receiving IN ketorolac compared to IV ketorolac. We hypothesize that there is no difference between IN ketorolac and IV ketorolac in the time it takes to achieve a clinically significant reduction in pain.
We will conduct a prospective, double-blinded, randomized, non-inferiority, parallel 1:1 clinical trial of eligible children in a single urban pediatric ED. We will block randomize patients to receive either 1 mg/kg IN ketorolac and an IV placebo (study group A), or 0.5 mg/kg IV ketorolac and an IN placebo (study group B).
We will assess the patient's pain at baseline, and then at 10 minutes, 30 minutes and 60 minutes after administration of the study drug. The patient will then be assessed at 2 hours and 24 hours after study drug administration for outcomes related to efficacy, function, and safety.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
QUADRUPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Ketorolac, intranasal
1. Ketorolac 1 mg/kg, maximum dose 30 mg. To be administered by intranasal route, single dose.
2. Placebo, intravenous.
Ketorolac, intranasal
Ketorolac 1 mg/kg, maximum dose 30 mg. To be administered by intranasal route.
Placebo, intravenous
Placebo of equal volume to IV ketorolac, to be administered by intravenous route.
Ketorolac, intravenous
1. Ketorolac 0.5 mg/kg, maximum dose 30 mg. To be administered by intravenous route, single dose.
2. Placebo, intranasal.
Ketorolac, intravenous
Ketorolac 0.5 mg/kg, maximum dose 30 mg. To be administered by intravenous route.
Placebo, intranasal
Placebo of equal volume to IN ketorolac, to be administered by intranasal route.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Ketorolac, intranasal
Ketorolac 1 mg/kg, maximum dose 30 mg. To be administered by intranasal route.
Ketorolac, intravenous
Ketorolac 0.5 mg/kg, maximum dose 30 mg. To be administered by intravenous route.
Placebo, intravenous
Placebo of equal volume to IV ketorolac, to be administered by intravenous route.
Placebo, intranasal
Placebo of equal volume to IN ketorolac, to be administered by intranasal route.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Headache severity of moderate to severe pain (i.e. at least 4/10 on the Faces Pain Scale - Revised)
* Requiring IV fluids and any IV medication (for example: ketorolac, metoclopramide, prochlorperazine, ondansetron) as part of their headache treatment, as per their treating attending physician
Exclusion Criteria
* Receipt of an NSAID within six hours of study drug administration
* Presence of an intranasal obstruction that cannot be readily cleared
* Inability to speak English or Spanish
* Unable to complete self-report measures of pain or questionnaires
* Critical illness
* Frequent use of drugs for headache (i.e. regular intake of analgesics for acute headaches on more than 10 days per month).
8 Years
17 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Migraine Research Foundation
OTHER
Columbia University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Daniel S Tsze, MD, MPH
Assistant Professor of Pediatrics
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Daniel S Tsze, MD, MPH
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Columbia University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
NewYork Presbyterian Morgan Stanley Children's Hospital
New York, New York, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
AAAO1302
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.