Focus of a Running Schedule and Risk of Running Injuries

NCT ID: NCT02349373

Last Updated: 2018-02-06

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

839 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-04-30

Study Completion Date

2017-10-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Running is a natural part of human locomotion and humans have been running for million of years. In modern society, running has become a popular way of exercise and is undertaken by many people worldwide, possibly because it provides a cheap and easily accessible form of exercise, and the positive effects of running on health and fitness are well known. Unfortunately, running is also associated with a high risk of injury.

The purpose of this project is to investigate how a running schedule which focuses either on running distance or running speed influence the overall risk of injury and the types of injury sustained in recreational runners.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Trails directed at investigating differences in injury risk in relation to the focus of the running schedule have been conducted without any firm conclusions. People engaged in recreational running or choosing running as a new and active lifestyle needs guidance on which running schedules minimize the injury risk, aiding their chance of an active lifestyle and possibly reversing the increase in people developing a lifestyle disease. To develop running schedules minimizing the risk of injury, an understanding of the mechanisms that the different training variables impose on the human body is necessary. The existing literature on running intensity and the development of injuries show conflicting result. More studies are necessary to ascertain if there is a relationship between the intensity of running. In such studies, it is important to include other training variables in the analysis and to quantify running exposure using an objective method of measuring the relative intensity and absolute volume.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Running Related Injuries

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Preconditioning running

An 8 week preconditioning period. The variables of interest are running distance and running intensity: running speed \>80% VO2max (maximal oxygen uptake).

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

An 8 week preconditioning period

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Receipt of a weekly running schedule through an online training diary.

Follow-up period

The Volume group progress 23% in total weekly running distance in the last adaptation week in the prior 4 week block.

The Intensity group progress 23% in weekly distance of running above 80% VO2 max (maximal oxygen uptake), based on the distance of running above 80% VO2max in the last adaptation week in the prior 4 week block.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

16 week training period

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Receipt of a weekly running schedule through an online training diary.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

An 8 week preconditioning period

Receipt of a weekly running schedule through an online training diary.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

16 week training period

Receipt of a weekly running schedule through an online training diary.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* on average 1-3 weekly running sessions the past 6 months
* owns a pair of running shoes
* internet access and mail address
* owns a Garmin GPS watch (pulse rate watch) or an IPhone/Android phone

Exclusion Criteria

* previous injury in lower extremity within the past 6 months
* unable to follow the running regime in 6 consecutive months
* do not want to use GPS (Global Positioning System) watch or Android/Smart phone to register training
* unable to read or understand Danish
* deprecated by personal GP (General Practitioner) to run due to former surgery or physical disease
* mental condition that does not allow participation (e.g. externalizing behaviors, dementia)
* pregnancy
* participants with blood pressure above normal according to WHO guidelines will need to consult own GP (General Practitioner) for approval
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Aarhus

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Northern Orthopaedic Division, Denmark

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Sten Rasmussen, M.D.

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Aalborg University Hospital

Daniel R. Joergensen, PhD student

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Aarhus

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Clinic for Neuro- and Orthopaedic Diseases, Aalborg University Hospital

Aalborg, , Denmark

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Denmark

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Ramskov D, Nielsen RO, Sorensen H, Parner E, Lind M, Rasmussen S. The design of the run Clever randomized trial: running volume, -intensity and running-related injuries. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016 Apr 23;17:177. doi: 10.1186/s12891-016-1020-0.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 27107810 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

N-20140069

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.