Evaluation of Satisfaction in Patients Undergoing Non Surgical Lifting by Means of Coned Wires.
NCT ID: NCT02347826
Last Updated: 2015-01-28
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
243 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2014-01-31
2014-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Preliminary Muscle Contraction in the Rehabilitation and Prevention of Degenerative Pain in the Locomotor System
NCT06415825
Effectiveness of ES and MT VS ES and PNF Technique Among Bells Palsy Patients
NCT05855928
Clinical Evaluation of Re-treatment of Cleft Lip and Nasal Deformation in Patients With Post Repair Deformities
NCT07348185
The Effect of Stabilization Exercises After Radiofrequency Lumbar Facet Denervation
NCT03444493
Gait Asymmetry And Its Relationship With Neck Pain And Muscles Strength In Patients With Cervical Radiculopathy
NCT07326202
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Among the 243 patients, 217 were females and 26 males, with age ranging from 19 to 76 years. 103 patients underwent only facial lift, of which 12 only in the frontal area, 61 only on cheek and malar area, and 30 on both the areas.
39 patients underwent only cervical lift, of those 14 by means of appliance of 1 or 2 wires, 25 by means of appliance of more than 2 wires.
101 patients underwent both facial and cervical non surgical lift. We sent to every patient a email questionnaire1 week, 1 month, 6 months and 1 year after treatment.
In the questionnaire, patients has been asked to enter a value between 1 and 5 about subjective satisfaction regarding the aesthetic improvement (ranging from 1, poor, to 5, excellent), and discomfort related to treatment (ranging from 1, no perceived discomfort, to 5, impossibility to execute working and social activities).
The data has been analyzed and related to other factors such as:
* number of wires applied on each patient
* other aesthetic or regenerative medicine treatments executed on the same patient on the same year
* total expenditure related to aesthetic treatments in the same year
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RETROSPECTIVE
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
19 Years
76 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
AQ-DE
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Mario Goisis, MS
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
AQ-DE
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
AQCE
Milan, Lombardia\Milan, Italy
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Aqde
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.