Heart Failure and Related Risk-factors After Preeclampsia
NCT ID: NCT02347540
Last Updated: 2022-07-28
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
2580 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2014-12-31
2025-07-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
In western countries, more women than men die of cardiovascular disease (CVD), making CVD in women an important public health issue. Misdiagnosis of CVD in women is frequently observed, posing the clinician for diagnostic and therapeutic dilemmas that can easily result in inadequate treatment and worse prognosis. Despite these challenges, CVD in women has been underexposed in scientific research.
Women have gender-specific risk factors like a history of preeclampsia (PE) that contribute to their risk for CVD. PE complicates 5-10% of pregnancies, recurs in \~25% and is associated with a 2-4 fold increased risk for CVD. Moreover, pre-symptomatic heart failure (HF) stage B occurs in 40% of women with a history of PE. HF stage B is thought to precede the development of the, mortality related, clinical HF stages C and D (structural heart disease in combination with symptomatic disease). Early detection and tailored intervention of women with stage B HF decreases progression to the clinical stages and might therefore improve clinical outcome and cardiovascular related mortality.
Phenotypic presentation of HF is currently split up between systolic HF also called HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and diastolic HF or HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Women more often have HFpEF in contrast to men. Different pathophysiology and disease progression in women compared to men seems to be an important underlying factor. The current clinical HF diagnostic tools (e.g. natriuretic hormones and high sensitivity troponins) fail to identify early changes that prelude adverse cardiac remodelling and HF, and do not discriminate between HFrEF and HFpEF. Moreover, there are sex-related differences in biomarker levels for detection of CVD. As a result, clinicians are forced to wait for the failing heart to become clinically evident before they can intervene. Therefore, there is an urgent need to assess novel biomarkers that could help select high risk women needing further follow up and intervention. Biomarkers may not only improve early diagnosis but may also unravel disease pathways of HFpEF. Especially when combined with measurements of subclinical, surrogate risk markers.
Objectives
* To determine the impact of PE on incidence of macro-and micro-vascular dysfunction reflected by surrogate measures for coronary artery disease (CAD) and HFpEF.
* To perform a genome wide association study (GWAS) and associate novel biomarker expression levels with endothelial function, cardiac diastolic function and IMT measurement.
* To identify risk factors and surrogate measures for CVD in a) former PE patients without HFpEF, b) former PE patients with HFpEF and c) healthy parous controls.
Study population Cases: women with a history of PE Controls: women with uncomplicated pregnancies in the history. Measurements will be performed in clusters at postpartum intervals of: ½-2, 5-10, 10-15 and 15-30 years. Number of inclusions will be: 425, 350, 282 and 233 for each follow-up group respectively.
Primary endpoints The prevalence of macro- and microvascular dysfunction in former PE patients. Novel biomarker detection in former PE patients associated with HF in general and HFpEF in particular.
Secondary endpoints
* Lifestyle (questionnaire)
* Cognitive ability (questionnaire)
* Depression score (questionnaire)
* Metabolic syndrome (MetS)
* Arterial endothelial function (Flow mediated dilation (FMD))
* Intima Media Thickness (IMT)
* Glycocalyx thickness (by means of the Glycocheck)
* Venous function (plethysmograph)
* Electrocardiogram (ECG)
* Ergometry
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Women Specific Cardiac Recovery After Preeclampsia
NCT02807324
Persistent Postpartum Cardiovascular Dysfunction in Patients With Preeclampsia
NCT04063397
Post-Pregnancy Cardio Trial
NCT03313063
The CoPenHagen PREeClampsia and cardIOvascUlar diSease Study
NCT03949829
Blood Pressure After PREeclampsia/HELLP by SELF Monitoring Study
NCT03228082
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_CONTROL
CROSS_SECTIONAL
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Women with a history of preeclampsia (cases)
Cases: women with a history of preeclampsia. Measurements will be performed in a postpartum interval from 0.5 years until 30 years after the first complicated pregnancy.
This group will further be subdivided in a subgroup with Heart Failure and a group without Heart Failure.
No interventions assigned to this group
Women with a history of uncomplicated pregnancy (controls)
Controls include women with a history of uncomplicated pregnancies. The controlgroup will further be subdivided in a subgroup with Heart Failure and a group without Heart Failure.
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Women aged ≥ 18 years
* ½ till 30 years after the complicated pregnancy
* Experienced PE in any pregnancy. PE defined as hypertension (systolic BP ≥ 140 mmHg and/or diastolic BP ≥ 90 mmHg) developed after 20 weeks of pregnancy with the development of proteinuria (≥ 300 mg/ 24 hours).
* Women who had their last delivery at least 6 months ago.
Controls
* Women aged ≥ 18 years
* ½ till 30 years after the pregnancy that matches the sequence number of pregnancy of the specifically matched case.
* Experienced pregnancies that were not complicated by foetal or maternal placental syndrome (pregnancy induced hypertension, preeclampsia, HELLP-syndrome).
* Women who had their last pregnancy at least 6 months ago.
* Women with a negative family history for PE (mother and sisters did not experience PE).
Exclusion Criteria
Cases
* Women with auto-immune diseases prior to the complicated pregnancy.
* Chronic hypertension prior to the complicated pregnancy.
* Renal disease prior to the complicated pregnancy.
* Pregnant women
* Women who do not want to be informed about the results of the tests, or women who do not want their general practitioner and specialist(s) to be informed about the test results.
Control group:
* Women with auto-immune diseases
* Chronic hypertension prior to the matched pregnancy.
* Women with IUGR in the matching pregnancy (p\<10)
* Solutio placentae in the matching pregnancy
* Pregnant women
* Women who do not want to be informed about the results of the tests, or women who do not want their general practitioner and specialist(s) to be informed about the test results.
18 Years
FEMALE
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
UMC Utrecht
OTHER
Leiden University Medical Center
OTHER
University Medical Center Groningen
OTHER
Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc
OTHER
Dutch Heart Foundation
OTHER
Maastricht University Medical Center
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Marc EA Spaanderman, MD, PhD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Maastricht University Medical Center
Gerard Pasterkamp, PhD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
UMC Utrecht
Hester HM den Ruijter, PhD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
UMC Utrecht
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Maastricht University Medical Center
Maastricht, Limburg, Netherlands
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Brandt Y, Alers RJ, Canjels LPW, Jorissen LM, Jansen G, Janssen EBNJ, van Kuijk S, Went TM, Koehn D, Gerretsen SC, Jansen J, Backes W, Hurks PPM, van de Ven V, Kooi ME, Spaanderman MEA, Ghossein-Doha C. DEcreased Cognitive functiON, NEurovascular CorrelaTes and myocardial changes in women with a history of pre-eclampsia (DECONNECT): research protocol for a cross-sectional pilot study. BMJ Open. 2024 Mar 4;14(3):e077534. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-077534.
Mohseni-Alsalhi Z, B N J Janssen E, Delmarque J, van Kuijk SMJ, Spaanderman MEA, Ghossein-Doha C. Prediction Model Based on Easily Available Markers for Aberrant Cardiac Remodeling in Women After Pregnancy. Hypertension. 2023 Aug;80(8):1707-1715. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.122.19187. Epub 2023 Jan 25.
Alers RJ, Ghossein-Doha C, Canjels LPW, Muijtjens ESH, Brandt Y, Kooi ME, Gerretsen SC, Jansen JFA, Backes WH, Hurks PPM, van de Ven V, Spaanderman MEA. Attenuated cognitive functioning decades after preeclampsia. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2023 Sep;229(3):294.e1-294.e14. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2023.02.020. Epub 2023 Feb 28.
Janssen EBNJ, Hooijschuur MCE, Lopes van Balen VA, Morina-Shijaku E, Spaan JJ, Mulder EG, Hoeks AP, Reesink KD, van Kuijk SMJ, Van't Hof A, van Bussel BCT, Spaanderman MEA, Ghossein-Doha C. No accelerated arterial aging in relatively young women after preeclampsia as compared to normotensive pregnancy. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Jul 28;9:911603. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.911603. eCollection 2022.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2013T084
Identifier Type: OTHER_GRANT
Identifier Source: secondary_id
METC 14-02-013
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.