Cerebral Palsy Early Mobility Training

NCT ID: NCT02340026

Last Updated: 2025-11-04

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

42 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-01-15

Study Completion Date

2020-07-13

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to determine the optimal treatment duration of a novel early mobility training program (dynamic supported mobility, DSM) between 6 to 24 weeks of treatment; and to evaluate the clinical futility of this intervention compared to current rehabilitation practice.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This study is a single-blind, randomized exploratory clinical trial with repeated assessments during a 24-week treatment phase and at three follow-up points over 12 months after treatment to track the developmental trajectory of participants' motor function. Gross motor ability will be compared to published percentile scores of motor function development in cerebral palsy (CP) to determine if the trajectory of predicted motor development is altered, and to outcomes of intensity-matched conventional treatment to determine if continued Phase III investigation is warranted.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Cerebral Palsy

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Conventional Therapy

The conventional treatment group will receive traditional, therapist-directed pediatric physical therapy. Therapy will focus on early gait training strategies and encouragement of "normal" movement patterns for walking and other age-appropriate movements, with manual guidance or correction of atypical movements from the therapist. This group may use assistive devices, orthoses, and may receive static body weight support for gait training. Therapy activities will be performed in blocks of practice, with the specific activities and level of therapist assistance tailored to each child.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Conventional Therapy

Intervention Type OTHER

No or static weight support; Therapist-directed (therapist initiates); Traditional early gait training methods: use of assistive devices/orthoses and may use treadmill; Focus on producing "typical" movement patterns with extensive manual guidance/correction from therapist, prevention of falls; Therapy activities grouped into blocks of practice (i.e. repeated floor to stand practice followed by gait training); Physical therapist expertise is focused on designing and directing the specific practice activities each session, tailored to the individual child

Dynamic Supported Mobility

Children will receive dynamic weight support during all DSM treatment time. The environment will be arranged to encourage active motor exploration, somewhat similar to a play gym for toddlers, to promote the motor variability, engagement, and error experiences that characterize the typical development of upright motor skills and walking. The floor area within 3 feet below either side of the overhead track for a distance of 20 feet (approximately 120 ft2 total) will be defined with colorful thin rubber interlocking mats and arranged with pediatric toys and activities, tailored to the child's interests and to encourage motor skills just beyond his/her current ability. The therapist will minimally assist the child as needed to perform the movements he/she initiates.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Dynamic Supported Mobility

Intervention Type OTHER

Dynamic weight support; Child-directed; No assistive devices, limited use of orthoses, no treadmill; Encourage high degree of error with reduced physical assistance; Encourage frequent variability in motor tasks (no redirection when moving from one activity to another); Physical therapist expertise is focused on designing a salient and challenging environment for the child's specific interests and ability level to encourage engagement, variability, challenge, and error experience, and on determining the appropriate amount of weight assistance

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Dynamic Supported Mobility

Dynamic weight support; Child-directed; No assistive devices, limited use of orthoses, no treadmill; Encourage high degree of error with reduced physical assistance; Encourage frequent variability in motor tasks (no redirection when moving from one activity to another); Physical therapist expertise is focused on designing a salient and challenging environment for the child's specific interests and ability level to encourage engagement, variability, challenge, and error experience, and on determining the appropriate amount of weight assistance

Intervention Type OTHER

Conventional Therapy

No or static weight support; Therapist-directed (therapist initiates); Traditional early gait training methods: use of assistive devices/orthoses and may use treadmill; Focus on producing "typical" movement patterns with extensive manual guidance/correction from therapist, prevention of falls; Therapy activities grouped into blocks of practice (i.e. repeated floor to stand practice followed by gait training); Physical therapist expertise is focused on designing and directing the specific practice activities each session, tailored to the individual child

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* 12-36 months of age
* Gross motor function below the 10th percentile for age \[Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development (BSID), BSID-III, corrected for gestational age, if applicable, under the age of two years\].
* Diagnosis of CP or neurological sign associated with CP (i.e. spasticity).
* Ability to initiate pulling to stand at a surface \[Score of 1 on gross motor function measure (GMFM) Item 52\].
* Cognitive ability to follow one-step commands.

Exclusion Criteria

* Secondary orthopedic, neuromuscular or cardiovascular condition unrelated to CP.
* General muscle hypotonia, without other neurological signs associated with CP.
* Independent walking ability (Score of 3 on GMFM Item 69 - Walks forward 10 steps).
* At or above the 50th percentile of GMFCS Level I.
* History of surgery or injury to the lower extremities in the past 6 months.
Minimum Eligible Age

12 Months

Maximum Eligible Age

36 Months

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Department of Health and Human Services

FED

Sponsor Role collaborator

Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Laura Prosser, PT, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Prosser LA, Pierce SR, Skorup JA, Paremski AC, Alcott M, Bochnak M, Ruwaih N, Jawad AF. Motor training for young children with cerebral palsy: A single-blind randomized controlled trial. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2024 Feb;66(2):233-243. doi: 10.1111/dmcn.15729. Epub 2023 Aug 7.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 37550991 (View on PubMed)

Pierce SR, Skorup J, Kolobe THA, Smith BA, Prosser LA. Agreement Between the Gross Motor Ability Estimator-2 and the Gross Motor Ability Estimator-3 in Young Children With Cerebral Palsy. Pediatr Phys Ther. 2024 Jan 1;36(1):37-40. doi: 10.1097/PEP.0000000000001065. Epub 2023 Nov 30.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 38033276 (View on PubMed)

Prosser LA, Pierce SR, Dillingham TR, Bernbaum JC, Jawad AF. iMOVE: Intensive Mobility training with Variability and Error compared to conventional rehabilitation for young children with cerebral palsy: the protocol for a single blind randomized controlled trial. BMC Pediatr. 2018 Oct 16;18(1):329. doi: 10.1186/s12887-018-1303-8.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 30326883 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

14-011172

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.