Effects of a Training Intervention After Thoracoabdominal Oesophagus Surgery

NCT ID: NCT02335970

Last Updated: 2020-01-06

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

64 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2005-09-05

Study Completion Date

2011-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study evaluates the effect of a training intervention after thoracoabdominal resection of the oesophagus. Half of the patients scheduled for thoracoabdominal oesophagus surgery were randomized to an intervention group while the other half a control group.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

It is well known that thoracoabdominal oesophageal resection for cancer is a procedure with high risks for complications. Earlier trials have shown that respiratory restrictions persist after the operation as well as lower physical function, range of motion in the rib-cage and limitations in activities in daily living. There are, however, only two clinical studies that evaluate postoperative breathing exercises and none evaluating any other rehabilitation interventions.

In other types of extensive surgery that may affect mobility with trauma to muscles and bone structures in the thorax and thoracic spinal column, there is strong evidence that speaks for an active rehabilitation approach in favour of a less active one.

The intervention evaluated was a rehabilitation program including exercises to restore lung function, range of motion in the thoracic spine and shoulders and strength exercises for the back extensors, shoulders and legs.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Oesophagus Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Training group

Training program: Daily exercises for 3 months

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Training group

Intervention Type OTHER

After 1 week

* Chest expansions
* Static thoracic extension in prone
* Lateral flexion of the spine in standing
* Bilateral shoulder flexion
* Shoulder external rotation of shoulders
* Rotation of the thoracic spine in sitting
* Static back extensor strength in prone

After 1 month

* Thoracic extension, rotation and flexion abduction
* Hand in neck and in back
* Bilateral active flexion abduction
* Strength training of leg muscles
* Static back extensor strength

After 2 months

* Strength training of legs and back muscles
* Push-ups against a wall
* Thoracic extension in sitting and standing
* Thoracic rotation in lying
* Stretching of mm. pectoralis Training was performed daily with 10 rep of each exercise

Controls

Standard care

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Training group

After 1 week

* Chest expansions
* Static thoracic extension in prone
* Lateral flexion of the spine in standing
* Bilateral shoulder flexion
* Shoulder external rotation of shoulders
* Rotation of the thoracic spine in sitting
* Static back extensor strength in prone

After 1 month

* Thoracic extension, rotation and flexion abduction
* Hand in neck and in back
* Bilateral active flexion abduction
* Strength training of leg muscles
* Static back extensor strength

After 2 months

* Strength training of legs and back muscles
* Push-ups against a wall
* Thoracic extension in sitting and standing
* Thoracic rotation in lying
* Stretching of mm. pectoralis Training was performed daily with 10 rep of each exercise

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients scheduled for thoracoabdominal oesophageal resection
* Ability to perform 90 W during a sub-maximal bicycle test
* Ability to speak Swedish

Exclusion Criteria

* Serious untreated cardiac disease that may be critical
* Musculoskeletal or neurological disease or trauma affecting respiration or range of motion in the rib cage
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Karolinska University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Göteborg University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Monika Fagevik Olsén, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Professor at Sahlgrenska Academy at Gothenburg University, Sweden

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

FoU in Sweden 13891

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Swedish Esophageal and Cardia Cancer Study
NCT06031155 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING