Validation of a Predictive Model of Response to Romiplostim in Patients With IPSS Low or Intermediate-1 Risk MDS and Thrombocytopenia

NCT ID: NCT02335268

Last Updated: 2023-08-16

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

77 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-05-21

Study Completion Date

2021-07-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

There are currently no licensed drugs in the EU to treat thrombocytopenia in MDS patients classified as IPSS low/int-1. Prior studies with romiplostim (a TPO receptor agonist) in MDS found that baseline concentration of TPO as well as transfusion history were predictive of subsequent response in a retrospective model. The current prospective study has the aim to explore whether both pretreatment variables (endogenous TPO, TPO-level, platelet transfusion history) can predict the response to subsequent short-term treatment with romiplostim.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are a heterogeneous group of hematologic malignancies of the pluripotent hematopoietic stem cells characterized by clonal hematopoiesis, progressive bone marrow failure, and the propensity to transform to acute myeloid leukemia (AML) (Malcovati et al., 2013).

There are currently no licensed drugs in the EU to treat thrombocytopenia in MDS patients classified as IPSS low/int-1. Prior studies with romiplostim (a TPO receptor agonist) in MDS found that baseline concentration of TPO as well as transfusion history were predictive of subsequent response in a retrospective model.

Classically, MDS is associated with apoptosis and excessive proliferation, resulting in a combination of a hyper-cellular marrow and peripheral cytopenia. The rationale for using romiplostim in MDS is to stimulate normal progenitor cells to increase platelet counts. Upon correction of thrombocytopenia, responding MDS patients should have a decreased risk of bleeding and a reduction in platelet transfusions (Giagounidis et al., 2014). This reduction in platelet transfusions may in turn decrease the risks of alloimmunization and the resultant morbidity and costs associated with that condition.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Myelodysplastic Syndromes

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Group 1

Stratification into group 1 if Score (Baseline-TPO Level and previous thrombocyte transfusions) are +3

TPO based model to predict subsequent response to romiplostim in MDS patients with IPSS Low/Int-1 according to a model developed by Sekeres et. al./ BJH 2014

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

N-Plate / romiplostim

Intervention Type DRUG

medical intervention in 3 patient groups (MDS patients with IPSS Low/Int-1) that are stratified according to their baseline TPO-Level and previous transfusions

Group 2

Stratification into group 2 if Score (Baseline-TPO Level and previous thrombocyte transfusions) are -1 or -2

TPO based model to predict subsequent response to romiplostim in MDS patients with IPSS Low/Int-1 according to a model developed by Sekeres et. al./ BJH 2014

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

N-Plate / romiplostim

Intervention Type DRUG

medical intervention in 3 patient groups (MDS patients with IPSS Low/Int-1) that are stratified according to their baseline TPO-Level and previous transfusions

Group 3

Stratification into group 3 if Score (Baseline-TPO Level and previous thrombocyte transfusions) are -6

TPO based model to predict subsequent response to romiplostim in MDS patients with IPSS Low/Int-1 according to a model developed by Sekeres et. al./ BJH 2014

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

N-Plate / romiplostim

Intervention Type DRUG

medical intervention in 3 patient groups (MDS patients with IPSS Low/Int-1) that are stratified according to their baseline TPO-Level and previous transfusions

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

N-Plate / romiplostim

medical intervention in 3 patient groups (MDS patients with IPSS Low/Int-1) that are stratified according to their baseline TPO-Level and previous transfusions

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Exclusion Criteria

* Must understand and voluntarily sign the informed consent form
* Age older 18 years at the time of signing the informed consent form
* Must be able to adhere to the study visit schedule and other protocol requirements
* Diagnosis of MDS using the 2008 WHO classification for myeloid neoplasms as assessed during the screening period
* Per MDS IPSS, low or intermediate-1 risk MDS as assessed during the screening period
* The mean of the 2 platelet counts taken within 4 weeks prior to stratification must be:
* ≤ 30 x 109/L (with no individual count \> 30 x 109/L during the screening period), with or without a history of bleeding associated with the diagnosis of MDS, OR
* \< 50 x 109/L (with no individual count \>60 x 109/L during the screening period), with a history of bleeding associated with the diagnosis of MDS (A standard of care platelet count taken prior to Informed consent may be used as 1 of the 2 counts taken within 4 weeks prior to stratification)
* Adequate liver function, as evidenced by ALT ≤ 3 times the laboratory normal range, AST ≤ 3 times the laboratory normal range and total bilirubin ≤ 2 times the laboratory normal range
* Bone marrow aspirate (central diagnostics) with cytogenetics (local) within 8 weeks of starting first dose of investigational product
* Female subjects of childbearing potential† must:
* Agree to use, and be able to comply with, effective contraception without interruption, 4 weeks before starting study drug, throughout study drug therapy and for 4 weeks after the end of study drug therapy, even if she has amenorrhoea. This applies unless the subject commits to absolute and continued abstinence confirmed on a monthly basis. Male patients who wish to participate in the study and their partner may become pregnant must agree also to reliable contraception during the study and for three months thereafter.

The following are effective methods of contraception\*

* Implant, - Levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (IUS), Medroxyprogesterone acetate depot, Tubal sterilization, Sexual intercourse with a vasectomised male partner only; Ovulation inhibitory progesterone-only pills (i.e., desogestrel)
* Agree to have a medically supervised pregnancy test with a minimum sensitivity of 25 mIU/ml not more than 3 days before the start of study medication once the subject has been on effective contraception for at least 4 weeks. This requirement also applies to women of childbearing potential who practice complete and continued abstinence.


* Pregnant or lactating females
* IPSS intermediate-2 or high-risk
* ≥ 5% blasts in the bone marrow as determined by central morphology during screening
* Previous treatment with any thrombopoietic growth factor
* Prior history of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, leukemia, aplastic anemia or other non-MDS related bone marrow stem cell disorder
* Active or uncontrolled disease including infections or cancer
* Unstable angina, congestive heart failure (NYHA \> class II), uncontrolled hypertension
* History of arterial thrombosis (e.g., stroke or transient ischemic attack) within the past year
* History of venous thrombosis that currently requires anti-coagulation therapy
* Prior use of sc or iv AZA.
* Receipt of G-CSF, peg-G-CSF, or GM-CSF,IL-11, ESA or LEN within 4 weeks of the first dose of romiplostim
* Planned receipt of peg-G-CSF or GM-CSF after the first dose of investigational product
* Subjects of reproductive potential who are not using adequate contraceptive precautions, in the judgment of the investigator. A double barrier method is defined as 2 methods of contraception, for example 2 actual barrier methods, or 1 actual barrier method and 1 hormonal method.
* Known hypersensitivity to any recombinant E. coli-derived product (eg, Nplate, Infergen, Neupogen, Somatropin, and Actimmune)
* Inability to comply with study procedures.
* Subject currently is enrolled in or has not yet completed at least 30 days since ending other investigational device or drug study(s)
* Any serious medical condition or psychiatric illness that will prevent the subject from signing the informed consent form or will place the subject at unacceptable risk if he/she participates in the study.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Amgen

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Gesellschaft fur Medizinische Innovation - Hamatologie und Onkologie mbH

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Uwe Platzbecker, Prof. Dr.

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

University of Dresden

Lionel Ades, Prof. Dr.

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Groupe Francophone des Myelodysplasies

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

CH

Annecy, , France

Site Status

CH Victor Dupouy

Argenteuil, , France

Site Status

CH Henri Duffaut

Avignon, , France

Site Status

CHU de Haut Lévèque

Bordeaux, , France

Site Status

CHRU Côte de Nacre

Caen, , France

Site Status

CHU Estaing

Clermont-Ferrand, , France

Site Status

CHU

Grenoble, , France

Site Status

CH

Le Mans, , France

Site Status

CHRU

Limoges, , France

Site Status

CH Lyon sud

Lyon, , France

Site Status

IPC

Marseille, , France

Site Status

CH

Meaux, , France

Site Status

Clinique Beausoleil

Montpellier, , France

Site Status

CHU Brabois

Nancy, , France

Site Status

Centre Catherine de Sienne

Nantes, , France

Site Status

Polyclinique Le Languedoc

Narbonne, , France

Site Status

CHR

Orléans, , France

Site Status

Hôpital Cochin

Paris, , France

Site Status

Hôpital Saint Louis

Paris, , France

Site Status

CHU

Poitiers, , France

Site Status

Centre Henri Becquerel

Rouen, , France

Site Status

Hôpital Bretonneau

Tours, , France

Site Status

MVZ Onkologischer Schwerpunkt am Oskar-Helene-Heim

Berlin, , Germany

Site Status

Vivantes Klinikum am Urban / Hämatologie Onkologie

Berlin, , Germany

Site Status

Klinikum Chemnitz gGmbH / Klinik für Innere Medizin III

Chemnitz, , Germany

Site Status

Universitätsklinikum Dresden / Medizinische Klinik I

Dresden, , Germany

Site Status

Marienhospital Düsseldorf GmbH / Innere Medizin u. Hämatologie

Düsseldorf, , Germany

Site Status

Universitätsklinikum Halle (Saale) / Klinik für Innere Medizin IV

Halle, , Germany

Site Status

Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf /Onkologisches Zentrum

Hamburg, , Germany

Site Status

Medizinische Hochschule Hannover / Hämatologie u. Onkologie

Hanover, , Germany

Site Status

Universitätsklinikum Mannheim / Klinik III / Hämatologie, Onkologie

Mannheim, , Germany

Site Status

Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Tumortherapiezentrum

München, , Germany

Site Status

MVZ für Blut u. Krebserkrankungen

Potsdam, , Germany

Site Status

Universitätsklinikum Ulm / Klinik Innere Medizin III

Ulm, , Germany

Site Status

Onkologische Gemeinschaftspraxis

Weilheim, , Germany

Site Status

Rems-Murr-Kliniken Winnenden / Hämatologie, Onkologie

Winnenden, , Germany

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France Germany

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

440/47

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Eltrombopag for Moderate Aplastic Anemia
NCT01328587 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING PHASE2