Validation of a Predictive Model of Response to Romiplostim in Patients With IPSS Low or Intermediate-1 Risk MDS and Thrombocytopenia
NCT ID: NCT02335268
Last Updated: 2023-08-16
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE2
77 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2015-05-21
2021-07-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Evaluating the Safety of Long Term Dosing of Romiplostim (Formerly AMG 531) in Thrombocytopenic Subjects With Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS)
NCT00472290
Eltrombopag for the Treatment of Thrombocytopenia Due to Low- and Intermediate Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes
NCT02912208
A Study of Eltrombopag or Placebo in Combination With Azacitidine in Subjects With International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS) Intermediate-1, Intermediate-2 or High-risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS)
NCT02158936
Eltrombopag in Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) Patients With Thrombocytopenia
NCT01286038
Study of Romiplostim for Chemotherapy Induced Thrombocytopenia
NCT02052882
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
There are currently no licensed drugs in the EU to treat thrombocytopenia in MDS patients classified as IPSS low/int-1. Prior studies with romiplostim (a TPO receptor agonist) in MDS found that baseline concentration of TPO as well as transfusion history were predictive of subsequent response in a retrospective model.
Classically, MDS is associated with apoptosis and excessive proliferation, resulting in a combination of a hyper-cellular marrow and peripheral cytopenia. The rationale for using romiplostim in MDS is to stimulate normal progenitor cells to increase platelet counts. Upon correction of thrombocytopenia, responding MDS patients should have a decreased risk of bleeding and a reduction in platelet transfusions (Giagounidis et al., 2014). This reduction in platelet transfusions may in turn decrease the risks of alloimmunization and the resultant morbidity and costs associated with that condition.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Group 1
Stratification into group 1 if Score (Baseline-TPO Level and previous thrombocyte transfusions) are +3
TPO based model to predict subsequent response to romiplostim in MDS patients with IPSS Low/Int-1 according to a model developed by Sekeres et. al./ BJH 2014
N-Plate / romiplostim
medical intervention in 3 patient groups (MDS patients with IPSS Low/Int-1) that are stratified according to their baseline TPO-Level and previous transfusions
Group 2
Stratification into group 2 if Score (Baseline-TPO Level and previous thrombocyte transfusions) are -1 or -2
TPO based model to predict subsequent response to romiplostim in MDS patients with IPSS Low/Int-1 according to a model developed by Sekeres et. al./ BJH 2014
N-Plate / romiplostim
medical intervention in 3 patient groups (MDS patients with IPSS Low/Int-1) that are stratified according to their baseline TPO-Level and previous transfusions
Group 3
Stratification into group 3 if Score (Baseline-TPO Level and previous thrombocyte transfusions) are -6
TPO based model to predict subsequent response to romiplostim in MDS patients with IPSS Low/Int-1 according to a model developed by Sekeres et. al./ BJH 2014
N-Plate / romiplostim
medical intervention in 3 patient groups (MDS patients with IPSS Low/Int-1) that are stratified according to their baseline TPO-Level and previous transfusions
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
N-Plate / romiplostim
medical intervention in 3 patient groups (MDS patients with IPSS Low/Int-1) that are stratified according to their baseline TPO-Level and previous transfusions
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Exclusion Criteria
* Age older 18 years at the time of signing the informed consent form
* Must be able to adhere to the study visit schedule and other protocol requirements
* Diagnosis of MDS using the 2008 WHO classification for myeloid neoplasms as assessed during the screening period
* Per MDS IPSS, low or intermediate-1 risk MDS as assessed during the screening period
* The mean of the 2 platelet counts taken within 4 weeks prior to stratification must be:
* ≤ 30 x 109/L (with no individual count \> 30 x 109/L during the screening period), with or without a history of bleeding associated with the diagnosis of MDS, OR
* \< 50 x 109/L (with no individual count \>60 x 109/L during the screening period), with a history of bleeding associated with the diagnosis of MDS (A standard of care platelet count taken prior to Informed consent may be used as 1 of the 2 counts taken within 4 weeks prior to stratification)
* Adequate liver function, as evidenced by ALT ≤ 3 times the laboratory normal range, AST ≤ 3 times the laboratory normal range and total bilirubin ≤ 2 times the laboratory normal range
* Bone marrow aspirate (central diagnostics) with cytogenetics (local) within 8 weeks of starting first dose of investigational product
* Female subjects of childbearing potential† must:
* Agree to use, and be able to comply with, effective contraception without interruption, 4 weeks before starting study drug, throughout study drug therapy and for 4 weeks after the end of study drug therapy, even if she has amenorrhoea. This applies unless the subject commits to absolute and continued abstinence confirmed on a monthly basis. Male patients who wish to participate in the study and their partner may become pregnant must agree also to reliable contraception during the study and for three months thereafter.
The following are effective methods of contraception\*
* Implant, - Levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (IUS), Medroxyprogesterone acetate depot, Tubal sterilization, Sexual intercourse with a vasectomised male partner only; Ovulation inhibitory progesterone-only pills (i.e., desogestrel)
* Agree to have a medically supervised pregnancy test with a minimum sensitivity of 25 mIU/ml not more than 3 days before the start of study medication once the subject has been on effective contraception for at least 4 weeks. This requirement also applies to women of childbearing potential who practice complete and continued abstinence.
* Pregnant or lactating females
* IPSS intermediate-2 or high-risk
* ≥ 5% blasts in the bone marrow as determined by central morphology during screening
* Previous treatment with any thrombopoietic growth factor
* Prior history of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, leukemia, aplastic anemia or other non-MDS related bone marrow stem cell disorder
* Active or uncontrolled disease including infections or cancer
* Unstable angina, congestive heart failure (NYHA \> class II), uncontrolled hypertension
* History of arterial thrombosis (e.g., stroke or transient ischemic attack) within the past year
* History of venous thrombosis that currently requires anti-coagulation therapy
* Prior use of sc or iv AZA.
* Receipt of G-CSF, peg-G-CSF, or GM-CSF,IL-11, ESA or LEN within 4 weeks of the first dose of romiplostim
* Planned receipt of peg-G-CSF or GM-CSF after the first dose of investigational product
* Subjects of reproductive potential who are not using adequate contraceptive precautions, in the judgment of the investigator. A double barrier method is defined as 2 methods of contraception, for example 2 actual barrier methods, or 1 actual barrier method and 1 hormonal method.
* Known hypersensitivity to any recombinant E. coli-derived product (eg, Nplate, Infergen, Neupogen, Somatropin, and Actimmune)
* Inability to comply with study procedures.
* Subject currently is enrolled in or has not yet completed at least 30 days since ending other investigational device or drug study(s)
* Any serious medical condition or psychiatric illness that will prevent the subject from signing the informed consent form or will place the subject at unacceptable risk if he/she participates in the study.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Amgen
INDUSTRY
Gesellschaft fur Medizinische Innovation - Hamatologie und Onkologie mbH
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Uwe Platzbecker, Prof. Dr.
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
University of Dresden
Lionel Ades, Prof. Dr.
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Groupe Francophone des Myelodysplasies
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
CH
Annecy, , France
CH Victor Dupouy
Argenteuil, , France
CH Henri Duffaut
Avignon, , France
CHU de Haut Lévèque
Bordeaux, , France
CHRU Côte de Nacre
Caen, , France
CHU Estaing
Clermont-Ferrand, , France
CHU
Grenoble, , France
CH
Le Mans, , France
CHRU
Limoges, , France
CH Lyon sud
Lyon, , France
IPC
Marseille, , France
CH
Meaux, , France
Clinique Beausoleil
Montpellier, , France
CHU Brabois
Nancy, , France
Centre Catherine de Sienne
Nantes, , France
Polyclinique Le Languedoc
Narbonne, , France
CHR
Orléans, , France
Hôpital Cochin
Paris, , France
Hôpital Saint Louis
Paris, , France
CHU
Poitiers, , France
Centre Henri Becquerel
Rouen, , France
Hôpital Bretonneau
Tours, , France
MVZ Onkologischer Schwerpunkt am Oskar-Helene-Heim
Berlin, , Germany
Vivantes Klinikum am Urban / Hämatologie Onkologie
Berlin, , Germany
Klinikum Chemnitz gGmbH / Klinik für Innere Medizin III
Chemnitz, , Germany
Universitätsklinikum Dresden / Medizinische Klinik I
Dresden, , Germany
Marienhospital Düsseldorf GmbH / Innere Medizin u. Hämatologie
Düsseldorf, , Germany
Universitätsklinikum Halle (Saale) / Klinik für Innere Medizin IV
Halle, , Germany
Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf /Onkologisches Zentrum
Hamburg, , Germany
Medizinische Hochschule Hannover / Hämatologie u. Onkologie
Hanover, , Germany
Universitätsklinikum Mannheim / Klinik III / Hämatologie, Onkologie
Mannheim, , Germany
Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Tumortherapiezentrum
München, , Germany
MVZ für Blut u. Krebserkrankungen
Potsdam, , Germany
Universitätsklinikum Ulm / Klinik Innere Medizin III
Ulm, , Germany
Onkologische Gemeinschaftspraxis
Weilheim, , Germany
Rems-Murr-Kliniken Winnenden / Hämatologie, Onkologie
Winnenden, , Germany
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
440/47
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.