Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Suptavumab (REGN2222) for the Prevention of Medically Attended RSV (Respiratory Syncytial Virus) Infection in Preterm Infants

NCT ID: NCT02325791

Last Updated: 2018-11-06

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

1177 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-07-21

Study Completion Date

2017-09-26

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), and immunogenicity of suptavumab (REGN2222) in infants born no more than 35 weeks, 6 days gestational age who are no more than 6 months of age at the time of enrollment in their respective geographic location. In order to optimize the potential benefit in this vulnerable population, we conducted this study during the RSV season using dosing regimens that are expected to be effective.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This study occurred in two parts: Part A and Part B.

Part A of the study was an open-label, PK evaluation of intramuscular (IM) administered suptavumab in preterm infants for whom palivizumab was not recommended to enable the selection of dosing regimens for Part B.

Part B of the study was randomized, double-blind, and placebo-controlled, designed to evaluate efficacy, safety, serum concentration and immunogenicity of IM administration of suptavumab in preterm infants for whom palivizumab was not recommended. The total duration of Part B was up to 265 days (includes a 28-day screening period, 57-day treatment period and 180-day follow-up period).

Up to 1515 subjects were planned to be included in Part B of the study. Participants were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 different groups, each with 505 infants; one group received one dose of suptavumab and one dose of placebo, the second group received two doses of suptavumab, and the third group received two doses of placebo.

There was a separate genetic testing sub study.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infections

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Part A: Suptavumab 30 mg/kg

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Suptavumab 30 mg/kg

Intervention Type DRUG

Participants received single dose of suptavumab 30 milligram per kilogram (mg/kg) intramuscularly (IM) on Day 1.

Part B: Placebo Matched to Suptavumab

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Placebo Matched to Suptavumab

Intervention Type DRUG

Participants received 2 IM doses of placebo matched to suptavumab: the first dose on Day 1 and the second dose on Day 57.

Part B: Suptavumab 30 mg/kg- 1 Dose

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Suptavumab 30 mg/kg- 1 Dose

Intervention Type DRUG

Participants received single dose of suptavumab 30 mg/kg IM on Day 1 and single dose of placebo matched to suptavumab on Day 57.

Part B: Suptavumab 30 mg/kg - 2 Doses

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Suptavumab 30 mg/kg - 2 Doses

Intervention Type DRUG

Participants received 2 doses of suptavumab 30 mg/kg IM: the first dose on Day 1 and the second dose on Day 57.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Suptavumab 30 mg/kg

Participants received single dose of suptavumab 30 milligram per kilogram (mg/kg) intramuscularly (IM) on Day 1.

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo Matched to Suptavumab

Participants received 2 IM doses of placebo matched to suptavumab: the first dose on Day 1 and the second dose on Day 57.

Intervention Type DRUG

Suptavumab 30 mg/kg- 1 Dose

Participants received single dose of suptavumab 30 mg/kg IM on Day 1 and single dose of placebo matched to suptavumab on Day 57.

Intervention Type DRUG

Suptavumab 30 mg/kg - 2 Doses

Participants received 2 doses of suptavumab 30 mg/kg IM: the first dose on Day 1 and the second dose on Day 57.

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

REGN2222

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Preterm, otherwise healthy male or female infant who is ≤6 months of age at the time of the first dose (i.e., infant must be treated on or before their 6 month birthday)
2. Gestational age is ≤35 weeks, 6 days at birth
3. Parent(s) or legal guardian(s) of the infant is able to understand the study requirements and willing to provide informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

1. Eligible, recommended and have access to receive palivizumab per AAP or other local guidelines, standard practice, or by their healthcare provider
2. History of CLD defined as requirement of supplemental oxygen for 28 days after birth
3. Known hemodynamically significant congenital heart disease
4. Known immunodeficiency, neuromuscular disease, or congenital abnormalities of the airway
5. Known renal or hepatic dysfunction
6. Major congenital malformations, including congenital cleft palate, cytogenetic abnormalities, or serious chronic disorders
7. Known or suspected impairment of immunological functions or autoimmune diseases
8. History of anaphylaxis
9. Previously received palivizumab or any other investigational RSV prophylaxis or vaccine product
10. Previous reaction to IV immunoglobulin, blood products or other foreign proteins, including vaccines and monoclonal antibodies
Maximum Eligible Age

6 Months

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Regeneron Pharmaceuticals

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Clinical Trial Management

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Regeneron Pharmaceuticals

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Regeneron Investigational Site

Birmingham, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Mobile, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Little Rock, Arkansas, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Anaheim, California, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Bell Gardens, California, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Dinuba, California, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Downey, California, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Huntington Beach, California, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

La Puente, California, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Madera, California, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Palmdale, California, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Ventura, California, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

West Covina, California, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Aurora, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Thornton, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Hartford, Connecticut, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Boynton Beach, Florida, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Gainesville, Florida, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Jacksonville, Florida, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Orlando, Florida, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Pensacola, Florida, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Tampa, Florida, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Winter Park, Florida, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Columbus, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Dalton, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Meridian, Idaho, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Nampa, Idaho, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Peoria, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

South Bend, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Hutchinson, Kansas, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Topeka, Kansas, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Bardstown, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Louisville, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Metairie, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

New Orleans, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Shreveport, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Silver Spring, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Fall River, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Woburn, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Stevensville, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Duluth, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Saint Paul, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Jackson, Mississippi, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Bridgeton, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Kansas City, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Lincoln, Nebraska, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Norfolk, Nebraska, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Omaha, Nebraska, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Reno, Nevada, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Lebanon, New Hampshire, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Neptune City, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

New Brunswick, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Brooklyn, New York, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Mineola, New York, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

New Hyde Park, New York, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Rochester, New York, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Syracuse, New York, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

The Bronx, New York, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Boone, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Durham, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Raleigh, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Cleveland, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Columbus, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Dayton, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Fairfield, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Mayfield Heights, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Toledo, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Youngstown, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Tulsa, Oklahoma, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Gresham, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Allentown, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Erie, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Hermitage, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Charleston, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Cheraw, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Greenville, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

North Charleston, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Alcoa, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Kingsport, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Nashville, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Austin, Texas, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Fort Sam Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Layton, Utah, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Roy, Utah, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

St. George, Utah, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Syracuse, Utah, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Charlottesville, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Midlothian, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Richmond, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Vienna, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Huntington, West Virginia, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Kingwood, West Virginia, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Morgantown, West Virginia, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Madison, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Marshfield, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Hobart, Tasmania, Australia

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Sofia, Sofia-Grad, Bulgaria

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Kazanlak, Stara Zagora, Bulgaria

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Blagoevgrad, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Dobrich, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Gabrovo, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Lom, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Montana, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Pleven, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Plovdiv, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Rousse, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Silistra, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Sliven, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Vidin, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

La Florida, Santiago Metropolitan, Chile

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Providencia, Santiago Metropolitan, Chile

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Puente Alto, Santiago Metropolitan, Chile

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Recoleta, Santiago Metropolitan, Chile

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

San José, Santiago Metropolitan, Chile

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

San Ramón, Santiago Metropolitan, Chile

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Aalborg, , Denmark

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Hjørring, , Denmark

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Næstved, , Denmark

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Viborg, , Denmark

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Oulu, Oulun Iaani, Finland

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Tampere, Oulun Iaani, Finland

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Pori, , Finland

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Turku, , Finland

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Bochum, , Germany

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Bramsche, , Germany

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Bretten, , Germany

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Frankenthal, , Germany

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Freiburg im Breisgau, , Germany

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Hamburg, , Germany

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Herxheim, , Germany

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Leipzig, , Germany

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Mainz, , Germany

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Mannheim, , Germany

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Mönchengladbach, , Germany

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Munich, , Germany

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Sankt Augustin, , Germany

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Wanzleben, , Germany

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Szeged, Csongrád megye, Hungary

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Budapest, , Hungary

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Gyula, , Hungary

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Nyíregyháza, , Hungary

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Pécs, , Hungary

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Veszprém, , Hungary

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Utrecht, , Netherlands

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Palmerston North, Manawatu-Wanganui, New Zealand

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Auckland, North Island, New Zealand

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Wellington, , New Zealand

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Panama City, , Panama

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

San Juan, , Puerto Rico

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Johannesburg, Gauteng, South Africa

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Pretoria, Gauteng, South Africa

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Ga-Rankuwa, North West, South Africa

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Esplugues de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

A Coruña, , Spain

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Granada, , Spain

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Manises, , Spain

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Málaga, , Spain

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Santiago de Compostela, , Spain

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Seville, , Spain

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Gothenburg, , Sweden

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Uppsala, , Sweden

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Ankara, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Istanbul, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Izmir, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Kocaeli, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Chernivtsi, Chernivtsi Oblast, Ukraine

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Dnipropetrovsk, Dnipropetrovsk Oblast, Ukraine

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Odesa, Odesa Oblast, Ukraine

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Vinnytsia, Vinnytsia Oblast, Ukraine

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Kharkiv, , Ukraine

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Kyiv, , Ukraine

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Poltava, , Ukraine

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Sumy, , Ukraine

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Ternopil, , Ukraine

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Zaporizhzhia, , Ukraine

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Coventry, Birmingham, United Kingdom

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Southampton, Hampshire, United Kingdom

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Gillingham, Kent, United Kingdom

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

London, London, City of, United Kingdom

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Oldham, Manchester, United Kingdom

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Stockport, Manchester, United Kingdom

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Belfast, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Birmingham, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Glasgow, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Manchester, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Poole, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Reading, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Sheffield, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Stockton-on-Tees, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Australia Bulgaria Canada Chile Denmark Finland Germany Hungary Netherlands New Zealand Panama Puerto Rico South Africa Spain Sweden Turkey (Türkiye) Ukraine United Kingdom

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Simoes EAF, Forleo-Neto E, Geba GP, Kamal M, Yang F, Cicirello H, Houghton MR, Rideman R, Zhao Q, Benvin SL, Hawes A, Fuller ED, Wloga E, Pizarro JMN, Munoz FM, Rush SA, McLellan JS, Lipsich L, Stahl N, Yancopoulos GD, Weinreich DM, Kyratsous CA, Sivapalasingam S. Suptavumab for the Prevention of Medically Attended Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infection in Preterm Infants. Clin Infect Dis. 2021 Dec 6;73(11):e4400-e4408. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa951.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 32897368 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol

View Document

Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan: Part A

View Document

Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan: Part B

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

R2222-RSV-1332

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.