Cancer Caregiver Burden: Targeting Emotion Regulation in a Trial
NCT ID: NCT02322905
Last Updated: 2025-03-24
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
80 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2015-08-31
2018-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Emotion Regulation Therapy to Address Distress Among Caregivers
NCT02697357
"Resilient Caregivers" - A Resilience-based Intervention for Distressed Partner Cancer Caregivers
NCT04610034
Early Rehabilitation of Cancer Patients
NCT01588262
A Clinical Trial on a Group Treatment for Distressed Caregivers of Cancer Patients
NCT02739243
A Study Comparing Two Types of Supportive Interventions for Caregivers of Patients With Cancer
NCT04802720
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The primary purpose of the study is to test the efficacy of Emotion Regulation Therapy (ERT) for informal caregivers (ICs) of cancer patients. ERT is a manualized treatment for ICs and consists of 8 weekly sessions.
AIMS AND HYPOTHESES:
Intervention and mediation effects. In an RCT, the investigators will investigate the efficacy of an 8 session ERT for ICs on psychological and physical distress and a number of other health outcomes in both ICs and cancer patients. Outcomes in the ERT group will be compared to outcomes in a group of ICs and patients receiving usual medical care (UMC) (see Figure 1). ICs receiving ERT compared to ICs receiving UMC are expected to exhibit 1a) significant reductions in psychological distress and perceived caregiving burden, 1b) improvements in quality of life; and 1c) improvements in pro-inflammatory markers of stress/immune functioning. Likewise, patients whose ICs receive ERT are expected to report 2a) reduced anxiety and depression, 2b) improved quality of life and 2c) less chronic inflammation. Due to the design, these effects will be considered following the acute treatment period (pre, mid and post therapy). In addition to this, gains are expected to be maintained over the follow-up-period. In addition, 3) improvements are exptected to be maintained over the follow-up period. Finally, 4) improvements in adaptive emotion regulation (mindfulness, acceptance, and cognitive reappraisal) are expected to mediate the effect of ERT.
PARTICIPANTS AND PROCEDURES:
ICs of cancer patients with various cancer types will be consecutively recruited from Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark. Staff at the Outpatient Clinic at the Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark, will screen ICs at the department. Initially the investigators wanted to include caregivers of patients with lung and colorectal cancer only. However, in order to be able to include caregivers at a faster pace, it was decided - after one month during which only two caregivers were included - to broaden the patient group. Furthermore, it was decided that more than one IC per patient could participate.
After giving informed consent, participants will be randomized to Emotion Regulation Therapy (ERT) or usual medical care (UMC) in a ratio of 1:1 by means of computer-generated randomization lists. Outcome measures will be obtained pre-, mid-, and post-therapy as well as at 3 and 6-month follow-up. At every ERT session, ICs and clinicians will fill out a number of self-report the process measures. Cancer patients will be assessed pre- and post ERT, and at 3 and 6-months follow-up. Every IC and patient will provide blood samples before and after the intervention as well as at follow-ups.
Based on a power calculation (alpha=0.0125, beta=0.90), a dropout rate of 35%, and an intraclass correlation between ICs of the same patient of 0.20, the inclusion of 80 ICs will allow for an interaction effect between group (ERT vs. UMC) and time (acute treatment, thats is, pre, mid and post) of a medium effect size (d=0.5) to be significant.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Emotion Regulation Therapy
8 sessions of Emotion Regulation Therapy.
Emotion Regulation Therapy
8 sessions of ERT
Usual Medical Care
No planned psychotherapy.
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Emotion Regulation Therapy
8 sessions of ERT
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Caregiver of patient with cancer
Exclusion Criteria
* active substance abuse (alcohol or drugs), and
* participation in other psychosocial trials.
18 Years
69 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Aarhus
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Mia S O'Toole, MSc
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Aarhus
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Unit for Psychooncology and Health Psychology
Aarhus C, , Denmark
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Mikkelsen MB, Elkjaer E, Mennin DS, Fresco DM, Zachariae R, Applebaum A, O'Toole MS. The impact of emotion regulation therapy on emotion differentiation in psychologically distressed caregivers of cancer patients. Anxiety Stress Coping. 2021 Jul;34(4):479-485. doi: 10.1080/10615806.2021.1929934. Epub 2021 May 28.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
ERT15-17
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.