Negative Pressure Wound Therapy and Allogeneic Human Skin Grafts for Wound Bed Preparation

NCT ID: NCT02314468

Last Updated: 2023-02-10

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

WITHDRAWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2013-10-31

Study Completion Date

2016-10-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Introduction Necrotising soft tissue infections (NSTI) incorporate a spectrum of pathologies, all characterized by an infectious state, typically arising after a penetrating trauma or a surgical procedure and an expeditious spreading of necrosis throughout the soft tissues of the body. It is a rare, life-threatening and devastating infection defined by a necrosis of fascia, subcutaneous tissues and skin. Aggressive surgical debridement to remove all necrotic tissue and define the extent of the disease is still the mainstay of correct treatment of NSTI.

Both negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) and the application of allograft skin to debrided areas, are documented options for wound bed preparation which are standard in the university hospital of Gent.

NPWT is a technique for wound bed preparation involving the controlled application of sub-atmospheric pressure to the local wound environment, using a sealed wound dressing connected to a vacuum pump. Mechanisms of action attributed to NPWT include an increase in blood flow, promotion of angiogenesis, reduction in wound surface area, positive modulation of the inhibitory contents of wound fluid, induction of cell proliferation, reduction of edema, and bacterial clearance.

Allograft skin or cadaveric skin possesses many of the ideal properties of biologic dressings, and plays a major role in the surgical management of extensive wounds when autologous tissue may not be immediately available. It reduces evaporative water loss and the drainage of protein-rich fluids, prevents wound desiccation, and suppresses microbial proliferation. Wound pain is lessened and the allograft restores a physiologic barrier at the wound surface. Enhancing revascularization, and thereby creating a viable wound bed before final reconstruction, is perceived as one of the most important features of allografting.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Study objectives This study will compare negative pressure wound therapy versus cadaveric skin as treatment options for wound bed preparation in wounds resulting from necrotising soft tissue infection.

Methodology One arm includes a NPWT system that is used in conjunction with gauze or foam dressings. Dressing changes normally will be carried out twice a week unless otherwise indicated by the wound condition, the patients clinical presentation or a seal broken beyond repair. NPWT wound bed preparation will be ended when two experienced plastic surgeons consider the wound bed suitable for autografting. (Endpoint) The second arm includes application of cadaveric skin. The allografts normally will be changed every seven to ten days or earlier depending on adhesion of the allograft to the wound bed. In practice, the ability of the allograft to adhere to the wound bed has a diagnostic value, referred to as a 'take-test'. If the allograft does not adhere, one must consider an infection or non-viable wound surface. If the allograft adheres to the wound bed and adequate granulation tissue is suspected underneath, then the wound bed is suitable for autografting. (Endpoint)

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Necrotizing Soft Tissue Infection

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT)

negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT)

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Negative pressure wound therapy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

NPWT changed twice a week.

Glycerol Preserved Allografts (GPA)

Glycerol Preserved Allografts (GPA)

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Glycerol Preserved Allografts (GPA)

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

GPA changed every 7 to 10 days.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Negative pressure wound therapy

NPWT changed twice a week.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Glycerol Preserved Allografts (GPA)

GPA changed every 7 to 10 days.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Necrotising soft tissue infection

Exclusion Criteria

None specific
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

90 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University Hospital, Ghent

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Stan Monstrey, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University Hospital, Ghent

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University Hospital Ghent

Ghent, , Belgium

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Belgium

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

http://www.uzgent.be

website hospital

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2013/724

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Epidermal Grafting in Wound Healing
NCT02535481 COMPLETED NA