Processing of Salient Emotional Stimuli as a Function of Tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and Cannabidiol (CBD)

NCT ID: NCT02291536

Last Updated: 2015-01-16

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

20 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-02-28

Study Completion Date

2014-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Attentional blink refers to a phenomenon where the detection of the second of two target stimuli that are presented in Short succession within a stream of stimuli is impaired. This is explained by an insufficient availability of attentional resources. Additionally, emotionally salient stimuli, like for example pictures with a positive or negative content, are detected more often compared to neutral pictures during this attentional blink period.

Cannabinoids are involved in the modulation of cognitive, attentional, and emotional processes. Interestingly, data from animals suggests that THC and CBD, both active ingredients in the Cannabis sativa plant, have opposing effects on brain cannabinoid (CB1) receptors. CB1 receptors modulate the expression of emotionally salient conditioned association in rats, if salience processes in humans are modulated in the same way remains unclear.

Employing a task to detect salient stimuli, Bhattacharyya et al. (2012) showed that THC seems to make non-salient standard stimuli more salient. They showed decreased activation of the right caudate and increased right prefrontal cortex stimuli during processing of salient stimuli. Importantly, this was associated with decreased response times to standard relative to oddball stimuli. Generally, THC and CBD differentially modulate brain areas associated with attentional salience processing. For example THC seems to increase prefrontal and striatal activation whereas CBD seems to decrease it.

The investigators assume that THC increases the number of correctly detected emotional stimuli during the attentional blink period, whereas CBD has no effect. Additionally, the investigators assume that pictures of the positive category are detected with higher accuracy than negative ones under the influence of THC.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Healthy Humans

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

BASIC_SCIENCE

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

tetrahydrocannabinol

oral administration of 10mg of tetrahydrocannabinol, once

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

tetrahydrocannabinol

Intervention Type DRUG

cannabidiol

oral administration of cannabidiol, 600mg, once

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

cannabidiol

Intervention Type DRUG

placebo

oral administration of placebo, once

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

placebo

Intervention Type OTHER

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

tetrahydrocannabinol

Intervention Type DRUG

cannabidiol

Intervention Type DRUG

placebo

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* male
* age between 18 and 65 years
* right-handed

Exclusion Criteria

* consumption of cannabis more than 5 times
* substance abuse (apart from nicotine)
* psychiatric disorders
* epilepsy
* chronic diseases (e.g. diabetes)
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

MALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Central Institute of Mental Health, Mannheim

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Oliver Grimm, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Central Institute of Mental Health, Mannheim

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Central Institute of Mental Health

Mannheim, , Germany

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Germany

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

AB_THC_CBD

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Effects of THC on Emotional Memory Retrieval
NCT03471585 COMPLETED EARLY_PHASE1
THC Memory & Reward Learning Pilot
NCT05116527 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING PHASE1/PHASE2
Cannabis Effects on Electroencephalography
NCT04316598 TERMINATED PHASE1
Cannabinoids, Learning, and Memory
NCT02407808 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING PHASE1
Reward and Drug Effects on Mood and Brain Response
NCT04512365 COMPLETED EARLY_PHASE1