Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
25 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2015-02-28
2015-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
This study will use a series of questionnaires and interviews to determine whether an adventure based therapy is both effective and reasonable as a treatment for people with mood disorders like depression and anxiety. The objective of this study is to investigate the efficacy of adventure based therapy as a treatment intervention for outpatients with mood disorders. The investigators will observe any changes in mood, perceived self- efficacy, anxiety, self-stigma, hope, quality of life enjoyment and satisfaction, leisure motivation, and stress as a result of this intervention. As well, the investigators aim to capture participant's opinions of the program.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
A Study to Assess the Effectiveness of Behavioural Activation Group Therapy in Individuals With Depression
NCT02297282
ONLINE AEROBIC THERAPEUTIC EXERCISE PROGRAM FOR PATIENTS WITH LIMITATION OF PERSONALITY
NCT05001295
Trial of Surf and Hike Therapy for Major Depressive Disorder
NCT03302611
Feasibility and Efficacy of Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Patients With ADHD/Behavioral Addiction Comorbidity
NCT06797726
Cognitive Behavioral vs. Interpersonal Therapy (IPT) Prevention of Depression in Adolescents
NCT00374439
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Adventure Based Therapy (AT) is a unique approach to traditional therapy strategies. AT is based on the philosophy of "experiential education", which is defined as "learning by doing, with reflection". The idea of experiential learning is based on the belief that learning is a result of direct experience, and learning is most effective when multiple senses are actively involved. By increasing the intensity of the mental and physical demands of learning, one can be fully engaged in the learning by simultaneously stimulating all sensory systems. Psychological research on information processing indicates that multi-sensory processing increases cognitive activity such as problem solving, processing of an experience, and memory. AT combines physical activity, social empowerment, and problem solving skills into a multi-sensory experience.
Recent literature suggests that AT can benefit patients' recovery. For example, preliminary work suggests that AT is effective in reducing feelings of hopelessness, guilt, and shame, and may increase empathy. Self-concept, self-confidence, and subjects' well-being have also been shown to be improved by AT. The concept of AT stems from the idea of team building exercises, and the notion that through participation patients experience increased group cohesion, therapeutic alliance, and communication and negotiation skills. Here, we will assess these variables in patients with mood disorders participating in AT using an extensive assessment battery. In addition, we will follow patients longitudinally to assess the durability of these effects.
The present research will be a pilot study designed to modify the protocol for the main trial. We will assess engagement in treatment by exploring participants' actual experiences and how they attribute meaning to their involvement in the therapeutic adventure based program. A qualitative research design that uses the Grounded Theory method will be used. Grounded Theory promotes a focus on individuals in real life situations and local social contexts. Qualitative interviews give participants the opportunity to have their voices or stories included in research studies as well as contribute to the development of effective treatment interventions. Feasibility of the trial will be determined by analyzing resource and economic utilization throughout the pilot.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Intervention
Participate in a two day Adventure-based Programming retreat and team building exercises.
Adventure-based Programming
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Adventure-based Programming
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
16 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Margaret McKinnon
Academic Head, Mood Disorders Program
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
St Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton
Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Anderson, L., Schleien, S. J., McAvoy, L., Lais, G., & Seligmann, D. (1997). Creating positive change through an integrated outdoor adventure program. Therapeutic Recreation Journal, Fourth Quarter, 214-229.
Bandoroff, S. & Newes, S. "Coming Of Age: Evolving Field of Adventure Therapy" (2004). Association for Experiential Education. Volume 3.
Beck, A. T., & Steer, R. A. (1990). Manual for the Beck Anxiety Inventory. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
BECK AT, WARD CH, MENDELSON M, MOCK J, ERBAUGH J. An inventory for measuring depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1961 Jun;4:561-71. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1961.01710120031004. No abstract available.
Gillen, M., & Balkin, R. (2006). Adventure counseling as an adjunct to group counseling in hospital and clinical settings. Journal for Specialists in Group Work, 31(2), 153-164. doi: 10.1080/01933920500493746
Ewert, A. W., McCormick, B. P., & Voight, A. E. (2001). Outdoor experiential therapies: Implications for TR practice. Therapeutic Recreation Journal, Second Quarter, 170-122.
Chakravorty, D., Trunnell, E. P., & Ellis, G. D. (1995). Ropes course participation and post-activity processing on transient depressed mood of hospitalized adult psychiatric patients. Therapeutic Recreation Journal, Second Quarter, 104-113.
Charmaz, K. (2003). Grounded Theory: Objectivist and Constructivist Methods. Strategies of Qualitative Inquiry, Denzin & Lincoln (EDS.). Sage.
Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis, Pine Forge Press.
Corbin, J. & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory, Sage.
Kyriakopoulos, A. (2011). How individuals with self-reported anxiety and depression experienced a combination of individual counseling along with an adventurous outdoor experience: A qualitative evaluation. Counseling and Psychotherapy Research, 11(2), 120-128. doi: 10.1080/14733145.2010.485696
Liamputtong P. Qualitative data analysis: conceptual and practical considerations. Health Promot J Austr. 2009 Aug;20(2):133-9. doi: 10.1071/he09133.
Patton, M.Q. (2002). Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods. (3rd edition). Thousand Oaks, CA. Sage.
Riley, K. (2011). Effects of a collaborative outpatient therapy program on self-concept of adolescents with depression. Therapeutic Recreation Journal, 45(1), 32-46.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
Directly quoted from in the project description. Gives a brief overview of Adventure Programming.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Adventure_PILOT
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.