Comparative Effectiveness of Rehabilitation Services for Survivors of Acute Ischemic Stroke
NCT ID: NCT02284165
Last Updated: 2018-03-01
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
164246 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2013-05-31
2016-05-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparison of Two Rehabilitation Strategies in Patients With Hemiparesis One Year or More After Stroke
NCT02202954
Integrating Stroke Survivors Into Cardiac Rehabilitation
NCT03706105
A Pilot Study of Rehabilitation Among Intensive Care Unit (ICU) Survivors: the RETURN Trial
NCT00715494
Effect of Intensive Motor Rehabilitation in Subacute Stroke Patient
NCT03168386
Determinants of Balance Recovery After Stroke - Retrospective Study
NCT03203109
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
1. What are the person- and system-level factors associated with use of rehabilitation services following acute ischemic stroke?
2. Among stroke survivors discharged to short-term inpatient rehabilitation, are high-intensity services performed at an Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility (IRF) more effective than lower intensity services performed at a Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF), at improving patient outcomes at 3 and 12 months?
3. Among stroke survivors discharged home, is early follow-up with a physician more effective than follow-up after 7 days at 3 and 12 months?
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
RETROSPECTIVE
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
retrospective analysis
Analysis of data for patients hospitalized in 2006-2008 with acute ischemic stroke, and successfully linked with Medicare claims through 2009
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute
OTHER
Duke University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Janet Bettger, ScD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Duke University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Duke University Medical Center
Durham, North Carolina, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Xian Y, Thomas L, Liang L, Federspiel JJ, Webb LE, Bushnell CD, Duncan PW, Schwamm LH, Stein J, Fonarow GC, Hoenig H, Montalvo C, George MG, Lutz BJ, Peterson ED, Bettger JP. Unexplained Variation for Hospitals' Use of Inpatient Rehabilitation and Skilled Nursing Facilities After an Acute Ischemic Stroke. Stroke. 2017 Oct;48(10):2836-2842. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.016904. Epub 2017 Aug 22.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Pro00044034
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.