Parental Decision-Making for Children With Relapsed Neuroblastoma

NCT ID: NCT02282735

Last Updated: 2025-07-29

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING

Total Enrollment

96 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2013-05-31

Study Completion Date

2027-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Parental decision-making for children with advanced cancer is complex. Many parents have overly optimistic beliefs about prognosis and as a result choose aggressive measures even at the end of life, which are associated with greater suffering. Yet most parents wish to limit suffering, and in retrospect, many regret choices for cancer treatment for advanced cancer. These findings suggest that parents do not always have the information they need to make decisions that reflect their preferences.

The proposed study will evaluate parental decision-making in advanced cancer, addressing gaps in the literature in 3 important respects. 1) Previous work on decision-making for children with advanced cancer has typically looked at decisions at one point in time, often asking parents to reflect on decisions after the child's death, even though parents' understanding of prognosis and decisions about care evolve over time. We will evaluate parental decision-making for advanced cancer over time. 2) Existing work focuses on aggressive end-of-life care as the worst possible outcome. However, some parents wish to pursue aggressive measures even when they recognize that the child has little chance for cure. We will evaluate the extent to which parental decision-making is informed and consonant with preferences, regardless of whether decisions lead to aggressive or palliative care. 3) Previous studies have focused on groups of different childhood cancers, making it difficult to ascertain whether differences in decision-making reflect differences in diseases, options for care, or parent preferences. We will focus on a single disease, relapsed neuroblastoma, as a model for parental decision-making.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Parental decision-making for children with advanced cancer is complex. Many parents have overly optimistic beliefs about prognosis and as a result choose aggressive measures even at the end of life, which are associated with greater suffering. Yet most parents wish to limit suffering, and in retrospect, many regret choices for cancer treatment for advanced cancer. These findings suggest that parents do not always have the information they need to make decisions that reflect their preferences.

The proposed study will evaluate parental decision-making in advanced cancer, addressing gaps in the literature in 3 important respects. 1) Previous work on decision-making for children with advanced cancer has typically looked at decisions at one point in time, often asking parents to reflect on decisions after the child's death, even though parents' understanding of prognosis and decisions about care evolve over time. We will evaluate parental decision-making for advanced cancer over time. 2) Existing work focuses on aggressive end-of-life care as the worst possible outcome. However, some parents wish to pursue aggressive measures even when they recognize that the child has little chance for cure. We will evaluate the extent to which parental decision-making for advanced cancer is informed and consonant with preferences, regardless of whether decisions lead to aggressive or palliative care. 3) Previous studies have focused on groups of different childhood cancers, making it difficult to ascertain whether differences in decision-making reflect differences in diseases, options for care, or parent preferences. We will focus on a single disease, relapsed neuroblastoma, as a model for parental decision-making. Children with relapsed neuroblastoma have advanced cancer but many options for care, including established cancer regimens, clinical trials, and palliation. Relapsed neuroblastoma presents an ideal model for parental decision-making in the setting of a complex array of choices. We will follow 120 parents at 8 institutions over time, beginning at relapse and continuing over 18 months. Parent interviews every 3 months and reviews of medical records throughout that time will be used to evaluate the ways that parental preferences for the aggressiveness of treatment change over time (Aim 1). Parental perception that care has been burdensome will be evaluated as possible driver of change in decision-making (Aim 2). Ideally, parent values for care would be the primary driver of treatment goals. Thus we will evaluate the extent to which parental understanding of prognosis, treatment options, and expected benefits and burdens of treatment can allow decision-making consonant with parental preferences in the absence of prior negative experiences with care (Aim 3). Finally, in-depth parent interviews will allow us to evaluate personal factors that drive parental decision-making (Aim 4). Throughout the study, a Parent Advisory Group will guide assessment of care preferences and decision-making.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Relapsed Neuroblastoma

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Parent of a child with relapsed or refractory high risk neuroblastoma, as defined by the International Neuroblastoma Risk Group, without respect to timing of first determination of relapse or refractory disease;
* Parent aged 18 years or older, of a child aged \<=18 years;
* English- or Spanish-speaking.

Exclusion Criteria

* Delirium/dementia as judged by the treating physician
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Dana-Farber Cancer Institute

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Jennifer Mack, MD

Attending Physician, Pediatric Oncology

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Jennifer W Mack, MD MPH

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Dana-Farber Cancer Institute

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Children's Hospital of Los Angeles

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

Stanford/Packard's Children's Hospital

Palo Alto, California, United States

Site Status

The University of Chicago Medical Center

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Dana-Farber Cancer Institute

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Columbia University Medical Center

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

St. Jude Children's Research Hospital

Memphis, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Cook's Children's Healthcare System

Fort Worth, Texas, United States

Site Status

Seattle Children's Hospital

Seattle, Washington, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

13-083

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Therapy for Children With Neuroblastoma
NCT00135135 COMPLETED PHASE2