Parental Decision-Making for Children With Relapsed Neuroblastoma
NCT ID: NCT02282735
Last Updated: 2025-07-29
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
96 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2013-05-31
2027-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The proposed study will evaluate parental decision-making in advanced cancer, addressing gaps in the literature in 3 important respects. 1) Previous work on decision-making for children with advanced cancer has typically looked at decisions at one point in time, often asking parents to reflect on decisions after the child's death, even though parents' understanding of prognosis and decisions about care evolve over time. We will evaluate parental decision-making for advanced cancer over time. 2) Existing work focuses on aggressive end-of-life care as the worst possible outcome. However, some parents wish to pursue aggressive measures even when they recognize that the child has little chance for cure. We will evaluate the extent to which parental decision-making is informed and consonant with preferences, regardless of whether decisions lead to aggressive or palliative care. 3) Previous studies have focused on groups of different childhood cancers, making it difficult to ascertain whether differences in decision-making reflect differences in diseases, options for care, or parent preferences. We will focus on a single disease, relapsed neuroblastoma, as a model for parental decision-making.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Gene Modified Allogeneic Neuroblastoma Cells For Treatment of Relapsed/Refractory Neuroblastoma
NCT00186862
Local Control With Reduced-dose Radiotherapy for High-Risk Neuroblastoma
NCT02245997
Therapy for Children With Advanced Stage Neuroblastoma
NCT01857934
Chemotherapy in Treating Children With Neuroblastoma
NCT00002730
Study of Systemic and Spinal Chemotherapy Followed by Radiation for Infants With Brain Tumors
NCT00042367
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The proposed study will evaluate parental decision-making in advanced cancer, addressing gaps in the literature in 3 important respects. 1) Previous work on decision-making for children with advanced cancer has typically looked at decisions at one point in time, often asking parents to reflect on decisions after the child's death, even though parents' understanding of prognosis and decisions about care evolve over time. We will evaluate parental decision-making for advanced cancer over time. 2) Existing work focuses on aggressive end-of-life care as the worst possible outcome. However, some parents wish to pursue aggressive measures even when they recognize that the child has little chance for cure. We will evaluate the extent to which parental decision-making for advanced cancer is informed and consonant with preferences, regardless of whether decisions lead to aggressive or palliative care. 3) Previous studies have focused on groups of different childhood cancers, making it difficult to ascertain whether differences in decision-making reflect differences in diseases, options for care, or parent preferences. We will focus on a single disease, relapsed neuroblastoma, as a model for parental decision-making. Children with relapsed neuroblastoma have advanced cancer but many options for care, including established cancer regimens, clinical trials, and palliation. Relapsed neuroblastoma presents an ideal model for parental decision-making in the setting of a complex array of choices. We will follow 120 parents at 8 institutions over time, beginning at relapse and continuing over 18 months. Parent interviews every 3 months and reviews of medical records throughout that time will be used to evaluate the ways that parental preferences for the aggressiveness of treatment change over time (Aim 1). Parental perception that care has been burdensome will be evaluated as possible driver of change in decision-making (Aim 2). Ideally, parent values for care would be the primary driver of treatment goals. Thus we will evaluate the extent to which parental understanding of prognosis, treatment options, and expected benefits and burdens of treatment can allow decision-making consonant with parental preferences in the absence of prior negative experiences with care (Aim 3). Finally, in-depth parent interviews will allow us to evaluate personal factors that drive parental decision-making (Aim 4). Throughout the study, a Parent Advisory Group will guide assessment of care preferences and decision-making.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Parent aged 18 years or older, of a child aged \<=18 years;
* English- or Spanish-speaking.
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute
OTHER
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Jennifer Mack, MD
Attending Physician, Pediatric Oncology
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Jennifer W Mack, MD MPH
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Children's Hospital of Los Angeles
Los Angeles, California, United States
Stanford/Packard's Children's Hospital
Palo Alto, California, United States
The University of Chicago Medical Center
Chicago, Illinois, United States
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Columbia University Medical Center
New York, New York, United States
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
St. Jude Children's Research Hospital
Memphis, Tennessee, United States
Cook's Children's Healthcare System
Fort Worth, Texas, United States
Seattle Children's Hospital
Seattle, Washington, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
13-083
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.