Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of ADVATE in the Standard Prophylaxis Treatment of Severe or Moderately Severe Hemophilia A
NCT ID: NCT02282410
Last Updated: 2014-11-04
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
15 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2014-12-31
2016-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
But after the Recombinant Human Coagulation Factor VIII for injection (ADVATE) Patient Assistance Program(Golden Key) was launched in 24 Apr 2014 in Nanjing China, the affordability of patients was solved and many patients will get more chance to receive standard prophylaxis.
This study is designed to evaluate the Annual Bleeding rate (ABR), joint health outcomes and QoL outcomes in subjects using standard prophylaxis under the conditions of routine practice.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Efficacy and Safety of ADVATE Standard Prophylaxis to Hemophilia A
NCT02280265
Retrospective Chart Review to Evaluate Safety and Tolerability of ADVATE Among Previously Untreated Patients in China With Moderate to Severe Hemophilia A
NCT02634723
Personalized Prophylactic Treatment With Advate® in Severe or Moderate Haemophilia A Patients
NCT02622646
A Study of Adynovate in Previously Treated Chinese Teenagers and Adults With Severe Hemophilia A
NCT05707351
China ADVATE PTP Study
NCT02170402
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Currently, based on the successful pioneer work of Dr Nilsson and her colleagues in Sweden that started in the late 1950's, prophylaxis is recommend as the standard of care for boys with severe haemophilia by WHO and WFH. \[2\] The efficacy and safety of prophylaxis in preventing bleeds and arthropathy in patients with hemophilia has been confirmed in well-designed clinical studies.\[3,4,5\]To keep the factor level above 1%, the standard dosage for patients with severe hemophilia A is 20-40 Units /kg/infusion (average 30 Units /kg) \[6\] every other day or three times a week. This dosage has a very high consumption of factor, up to 5000-6000 international unit(IU)/kg/year. \[7\] The high consumption of factor and cost present a major barrier to use the standard prophylaxis in many countries particularly in the developing world. \[8\] Many families are looking forward to standard prophylaxis to reducing bleeding episodes, stop or slow the deterioration of joint disease in their sons with severe hemophilia and thus improving their quality of life (QoL). But in China the majority of boys with severe hemophilia A cannot afford the high costs of standard prophylaxis .They can only pay for on-demand treatment or low-dose prophylaxis. But after the Advate Patient Assistance Program(Golden Key) was launched in 24 Apr 2014 in Nanjing China, the affordability of patients was solved and many patients will get more chance to receive standard prophylaxis.
This study is designed to evaluate the Annual Bleeding rate (ABR), joint health outcomes and QoL outcomes in subjects using standard prophylaxis under the conditions of routine practice.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
ADVATE standard prophylaxis
This study is a prospective, open-label, interventional, multicenter study in a total of 15 PTPs with hemophilia A (FVIII≤2 %).The baseline ABR will be assessed from bleeding log and clinic records from preceding year. Subjects will initially be treated standard prophylaxis(20 - 40 IU/Kg body weight 2-3 times one week with ADVATE for 1 year. Subjects must be prescribed ADVATE by the treating physician. Data will be collected over a period of 2 years from the time of study enrollment. Study visits are to coincide with routinely rescheduled and emergency visits. Available data from these visits shall be transcribed onto the case report forms (CRFs).
ADVATE
The baseline ABR will be assessed from bleeding log and clinic records from preceding year. Subjects will initially be treated standard prophylaxis(20 - 40 IU/Kg body weight 2-3 times one week with ADVATE for 1 year.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
ADVATE
The baseline ABR will be assessed from bleeding log and clinic records from preceding year. Subjects will initially be treated standard prophylaxis(20 - 40 IU/Kg body weight 2-3 times one week with ADVATE for 1 year.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Previously treated patients (PTPs).
3. Age from 2 to 18 years.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Subject has known allergic reaction to mouse or hamster proteins.
3. Subject has participated in another clinical study involving an investigational product (IP) or device within 30 days prior to study enrollment or is scheduled to participate in another clinical study involving another FVIII concentrate or device during the course of this study.
4. Subject is planned, or likely to have surgery during the study period.
5. Subject has end-stage renal failure or evidence of a severe or uncontrolled systemic disease as judged by the investigator.
6. Subject has full-blown Acquired Immuno Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS),determined by cluster differentiation antigen 4+ (CD4+) and clinical presentation.
7. Subject has active hepatic disease (alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) levels \> 5 times the upper limit of normal).
8. Subject has clinical or laboratory evidence of severe liver impairment including (but not limited to) a recent and persistent international normalized ratio (INR)\> 1.4, and/or the presence of splenomegaly and/or significant spider angioma on physical exam, and/or a history of esophageal hemorrhage or documented esophageal varices.
9. The subject in the opinion of the investigator is unable or unwilling to comply with study protocol
10. Subject is a family member of the investigator or site staff
2 Years
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
The Affiliated Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Jian OUYANG
Director of Hematology-Oncology Department
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Ouyang Jian, Doctor
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
The Affiliated Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital Nanjing Medical University
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Astermark J, Petrini P, Tengborn L, Schulman S, Ljung R, Berntorp E. Primary prophylaxis in severe haemophilia should be started at an early age but can be individualized. Br J Haematol. 1999 Jun;105(4):1109-13. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2141.1999.01463.x.
Berntorp E, Boulyjenkov V, Brettler D, Chandy M, Jones P, Lee C, Lusher J, Mannucci P, Peak I, Rickard K, et al. Modern treatment of haemophilia. Bull World Health Organ. 1995;73(5):691-701.
Manco-Johnson MJ, Abshire TC, Shapiro AD, Riske B, Hacker MR, Kilcoyne R, Ingram JD, Manco-Johnson ML, Funk S, Jacobson L, Valentino LA, Hoots WK, Buchanan GR, DiMichele D, Recht M, Brown D, Leissinger C, Bleak S, Cohen A, Mathew P, Matsunaga A, Medeiros D, Nugent D, Thomas GA, Thompson AA, McRedmond K, Soucie JM, Austin H, Evatt BL. Prophylaxis versus episodic treatment to prevent joint disease in boys with severe hemophilia. N Engl J Med. 2007 Aug 9;357(6):535-44. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa067659.
Gringeri A, Lundin B, von Mackensen S, Mantovani L, Mannucci PM; ESPRIT Study Group. A randomized clinical trial of prophylaxis in children with hemophilia A (the ESPRIT Study). J Thromb Haemost. 2011 Apr;9(4):700-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2011.04214.x.
Valentino LA, Mamonov V, Hellmann A, Quon DV, Chybicka A, Schroth P, Patrone L, Wong WY; Prophylaxis Study Group. A randomized comparison of two prophylaxis regimens and a paired comparison of on-demand and prophylaxis treatments in hemophilia A management. J Thromb Haemost. 2012 Mar;10(3):359-67. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2011.04611.x.
Srivastava A, Brewer AK, Mauser-Bunschoten EP, Key NS, Kitchen S, Llinas A, Ludlam CA, Mahlangu JN, Mulder K, Poon MC, Street A; Treatment Guidelines Working Group on Behalf of The World Federation Of Hemophilia. Guidelines for the management of hemophilia. Haemophilia. 2013 Jan;19(1):e1-47. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2516.2012.02909.x. Epub 2012 Jul 6.
Nilsson IM, Berntorp E, Lofqvist T, Pettersson H. Twenty-five years' experience of prophylactic treatment in severe haemophilia A and B. J Intern Med. 1992 Jul;232(1):25-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2796.1992.tb00546.x.
Ljung R. Prophylactic therapy in haemophilia. Blood Rev. 2009 Nov;23(6):267-74. doi: 10.1016/j.blre.2009.08.001. Epub 2009 Sep 22.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2014-053-01
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.