Safety and Efficacy of APD811 in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension
NCT ID: NCT02279160
Last Updated: 2020-07-14
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE2
61 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2014-12-31
2017-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Long-term Safety and Efficacy of Ralinepag in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension
NCT02279745
A Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Ralinepag to Improve Treatment Outcomes in PAH Patients
NCT03626688
Iloprost Power Disc-15 in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension
NCT00723554
Efficacy and Safety of Oral UT-15C Tablets to Treat Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension
NCT00887978
A Study Evaluating the Long-Term Efficacy and Safety of Ralinepag in Subjects With PAH Via an Open-Label Extension
NCT03683186
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Approximately 60 subjects with PAH were planned to be enrolled (61 actual). After screening, eligible subjects were randomized 2:1 to ralinepag (APD811) or to placebo. Randomization was stratified by baseline WHO/NYHA functional class (II versus III or IV). Subjects randomized to active therapy were given ralinepag at a starting dose of 0.01 mg BID. Subjects randomized to the placebo arm received matching placebo capsules to preserve the blind. Subjects were instructed to take the study drug (ralinepag or placebo) with food. Dosage was then uptitrated, as tolerated, over the course of the 9-week dose-titration period to a maximum dose of 0.3 mg BID. Although doses could be reduced based on tolerability, the final dosage reached was required to be stable during the 13-week treatment period prior to evaluation at Week 22.
Subjects could receive concomitant oral disease-specific PAH therapy consisting of an ERA and/or an agent acting on the nitric oxide pathway, a PDE-5 inhibitor or a sGC stimulator, provided the dose had remained stable for at least 3 months prior to the start of screening. It was recommended that subjects continue the same dose and regimen of these medications for the duration of the study. With the exception of prostanoids, the use of other supporting therapies, which may affect PAH, was also permitted.
During the study, assessments of efficacy were performed including PVR and other hemodynamic parameters as determined by RHC, the 6MWT, assessment of clinical worsening, BNP and NT-proBNP levels, WHO/NYHA functional class assessment of PAH. Safety assessments included standard evaluations of AEs, clinical laboratory values, vital signs, and ECG measurements.
At the end of the maintenance period, subjects who did not choose to participate in the OLE study were to discontinue study drug (ralinepag or placebo). All subjects that chose to continue in the OLE study were to remain on study drug until the follow-up visit at Week 25. This visit served as the baseline visit for the OLE study if the subject was eligible and chose to participate.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
APD811
Multiple dose titration to maximum tolerated dose.
APD811
Placebo
Multiple dose titration to maximum tolerated dose.
Placebo
Placebo
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
APD811
Placebo
Placebo
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Symptomatic WHO Group 1 PAH classified by one of the following subgroups:
* Idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension (IPAH);
* Heritable pulmonary arterial hypertension (HPAH);
* Drugs and toxins induced;
* Associated pulmonary arterial hypertension (APAH); specifically connective tissue diseases, HIV infection and congenital heart disease.
* Has had the diagnosis of PAH confirmed by cardiac catheterization
* Has WHO/NYHA functional class II- IV symptomatology
* Previously diagnosed with PAH and on stable oral disease-specific PAH therapy with either an ERA and/or an agent acting on the nitric oxide pathway, i.e. a PDE5 inhibitor or a soluble guanylate cyclase stimulator. Stable is defined as no change in dose within 3 months of the start of Screening and for the duration of the study
* Has 6MWT distances of 100-500 m, and within 15% of each other on 2 consecutive tests done on different days at Screening
* Has pulmonary function tests (PFTs) within 6 months prior to the start of Screening with no evidence of significant parenchymal lung disease
* Has a ventilation-perfusion (V/Q) lung scan or pulmonary angiogram within 5 years prior to Screening and concomitant with or following diagnosis of PAH that shows no evidence of thromboembolic disease
* If on vasodilators (including calcium channel blockers), digoxin, spironolactone, or L-Arginine supplementation; the patient must be on a stable dose for at least 1 month prior to the start of Screening
Exclusion Criteria
* Previous participation in any clinical study with an investigational drug, biologic, or device within 2 months prior to the Screening visit
* Acutely decompensated heart failure within 1 month prior to start of Screening
* Systolic blood pressure \<90 mm Hg at Screening
* Evidence or history of left-sided heart disease and/or clinically significant cardiac disease
* Use or chronic administration (defined as \>30 days) of a prostacyclin or prostacyclin analogue within 3 months of Screening
* Any previous use of a prostacyclin or prostacyclin analogue that was stopped for safety or tolerability issues associated with pharmacology/mechanism of action
* Other severe acute or chronic medical or laboratory abnormality that may increase the risk associated with study participation or investigational product administration or may interfere with the interpretation of study results and, in the judgment of the investigator, would make the patient inappropriate for entry into this study
18 Years
75 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
United Therapeutics
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Derek Solum, PhD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
United Therapeutics
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
Los Angeles, California, United States
UC Davis Medical Center
Sacramento, California, United States
UCLA Medical Center
Torrance, California, United States
University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics
Iowa City, Iowa, United States
University of Maryland
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
Boston University Medical Center
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
University of Cincinnati
Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
Ohio State University Medical Center
Columbus, Ohio, United States
University of Pittsburg Medical Center
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
UT Southwestern
Dallas, Texas, United States
University of Texas, Houston Center for Clinical and Translational Sciences
Houston, Texas, United States
The Prince Charles Hospital
Chermside, , Australia
St Vincent's Hospital
Darlinghurst, , Australia
St Vincent's Hospital
Fitzroy, , Australia
Royal Hobart Hospital
Hobart, , Australia
Fiona Stanley Hospital
Murdoch, , Australia
"Многопрофилната болница за активно лечение "Национална кардиологична болница "" ЕАД
Sofia, , Bulgaria
Многопрофилна болница за активно лечение "Света Анна" София АД, Клиника по кардиология
Sofia, , Bulgaria
II. interní klinika - klinika kardiologie a angiologie, 1. lékařská fakulta, Univerzita Karlova v Praze a Všeobecná fakultní nemocnice v Praze
Prague, , Czechia
Gottsegen György Országos Kardiologiai Intézet, Felnőtt Kardiológia
Budapest, , Hungary
Semmelweis Egyetem Pulmonológiai Klinika
Budapest, , Hungary
Pécsi Tudományegyetem Klinikai Központ, Szívgyógyászati Klinika
Pécs, , Hungary
Uniwersytecki Szpital Kliniczny w Białymstoku
Bialystok, , Poland
Krakowski Szpital Specjalistyczny im. Jana Pawła II w Krakowie
Krakow, , Poland
Wojewódzki Szpital Specjalistyczny im. W. Biegańskiego w Łodzi
Lodz, , Poland
Institutul de Urgență pentru Boli Cardiovasculare, Secția Clinică Cardiologie III
Bucharest, , Romania
Institutul de Pneumoftiziologie "Marius Nasta", Secția Clinică Pneumoftiziologie IV
Bucharest, , Romania
Spitalul Clinic de Boli Infectioase si Pneumoftiziologie, Sectia Clinica Pneumologie II
Timișoara, , Romania
Klinički Centar Srbije (KCS), Klinika za kardiologiju
Belgrade, , Serbia
Kliničko-bolnički centar (KBC) Zemun,Klinika za internu medicinu,Sluzba kardiologije
Belgrade, , Serbia
Institut za plućne bolesti Vojvodine Sremska Kamenica (IPBVSK),
Kamenitz, , Serbia
Hospital Universitari General Vall d'Hebron, Servicio de Neumología
Barcelona, , Spain
Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Departamento de Pneumologia
Barcelona, , Spain
Hospital 12 de Octubre, Departamento de Cardiologia
Madrid, , Spain
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Torres F, Farber H, Ristic A, McLaughlin V, Adams J, Zhang J, Klassen P, Shanahan W, Grundy J, Hoffmann I, Cabell C, Escribano Subias P, Sood N, Keogh A, D'Souza G, Rubin L. Efficacy and safety of ralinepag, a novel oral IP agonist, in PAH patients on mono or dual background therapy: results from a phase 2 randomised, parallel group, placebo-controlled trial. Eur Respir J. 2019 Oct 10;54(4):1901030. doi: 10.1183/13993003.01030-2019. Print 2019 Oct.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol
Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
APD811-003
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.