Molecular Testing and Imaging in Improving Response in Patients With Stage I-III Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Receiving Chemotherapy MDACC Breast Moonshot Initiative

NCT ID: NCT02276443

Last Updated: 2025-08-01

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

798 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-11-09

Study Completion Date

2026-11-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This clinical trial assesses whether a newly designed algorithm which looks at the genomic signature of each patient's tumor to predict their sensitivity to standard of care treatment verses being placed on a personally designed treatment trial can improve the responses in patients with newly diagnosed triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Testing the primary tumor biopsy for certain proteins and monitoring the lymphocyte infiltration into the tumors may help doctors determine the sub-type of TNBC, and direct treatments that may work well. It is not yet known whether assigning treatment based on the patient's tumor classification will improve how well the tumor responds.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

PRIMARY OBJECTIVE:

I. To conduct a prospective single arm, non-randomized trial to determine the impact of implementation of a research platform that includes diagnostic imaging to assess response to the initial phase of neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with subtyping of TNBC in order to select the appropriate targeted therapy trial to complete neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients found to have chemo-insensitive disease by imaging.

SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:

I. Measured as defined by Standardized Definitions for Efficacy End Points (STEEP) criteria using the following prioritization: distant recurrence free interval (DRFI), recurrence free survival (RFS), distant relapse-free survival (DRFS), overall survival (OS), invasive disease free survival (IDFS), disease free survival including ductal carcinoma in situ (DFS-DCIS).

II. Evaluate the rates of enrollment into clinical trials for patients identified as having chemotherapy insensitive disease.

III. Evaluate the frequency of pathologic response rates (pCR, RCB I-III residual disease) in patients identified as chemotherapy sensitive versus insensitive.

IV. Determine the estimates of DRFI, RFS, DRFS, IDFS and DFS-DCIS at 3 years, and OS at 5 and 10 years in all patients.

X. Determine the pathologic response based on molecular characterization. XI. Determine the estimates of DRFI, RFS, DRFS, IDFS and DFS-DCIS at 3 years, and OS at 5 and 10 years.

XII. Subset analyses of pathologic response and 3-year DRFI, RFS, DRFS, IDFS, and DFS-DCIS.

XIII. Compare the results of pathologic node-negative status (sentinel and/or non-sentinel nodes) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy according to a genomic predictor of nodal response to NACT, in subsets defined by pre-treatment clinical nodal status.

EXPLORATORY OBJECTIVES:

I. Future re-analysis of residual samples using a customized genomic diagnostic platform (integrated "prospective-retrospective" biomarker analysis) to predict chemotherapy sensitivity.

II. Generation and subsequent molecular characterization of patient derived xenograph (PDX) models.

III. Clinical diagnostic development studies using residual samples (fresh and/or formalin-fixed) within the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA)-compliant Molecular Diagnostics Laboratory, and patient derived xenographs (PDX) to formally evaluate the clinical validity and utility of future clinical genomic diagnostic tests that would predict both response, recurrence, and survival from the treatments used in this clinical trial (correlative "retrospective-prospective" biomarker analyses).

IV. Correlative science studies to identify molecular therapeutic targets for treatment-insensitive TNBC using residual samples and PDX models.

V. Correlation of tumor features or changes as measured by diagnostic imaging to determine potential predictors of treatment response.

VI. Determine polymerase chain reaction (pCR) rates in a cohort of patients who undergo surgical resection after achieving complete radiological response after 4 cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC).

OUTLINE: Patients are assigned to 1 of 3 arms.

ARM A: Patients undergo baseline molecular and immunohistochemistry (IHC) evaluation of their tumor biopsy, and receive the results. Patients then receive standard anthracycline-based chemotherapy and undergo standard ultrasound at baseline, after 2 cycles, after 4 cycles of treatment, and after completion of treatment (before surgery). Patients and physicians are notified of the results of the molecular evaluation. Patients may then choose to continue with standard taxane +/- platinum-based chemotherapy or participate in an experimental clinical trial designed to match the molecular profile and triple-negative subtype. Patients with tumors predicted to be insensitive to chemotherapy are advised to participate in a clinical trial treating their tumor subtype.

ARM B: Patients undergo baseline molecular and IHC evaluation of their tumor biopsy, and receive the results. Patients then receive standard anthracycline-based chemotherapy and undergo standard ultrasound at baseline, after 2 cycles, and after 4 cycles of treatment. Patients and physicians are notified of the results of the molecular evaluation. Patients may then choose to continue with standard taxane +/- platinum-based chemotherapy or participate in an experimental clinical trial designed to match the molecular profile and triple-negative subtype. Patients with tumors predicted to be insensitive to chemotherapy are advised to participate in a clinical trial treating their tumor subtype.

ARM C: Patients undergo baseline molecular and IHC evaluation of their tumor biopsy, and receive the results. Patients then receive standard anthracycline-based chemotherapy with immunotherapy and undergo standard ultrasound at baseline, after 2 cycles, and after 4 cycles of treatment. Patients and physicians are notified of the results of the molecular evaluation. Patients may then choose to continue with standard taxane +/- platinum-based chemotherapy or participate in an experimental clinical trial designed to match the molecular profile and triple-negative subtype. Patients with tumors predicted to be insensitive to chemotherapy are advised to participate in a clinical trial treating their tumor subtype.

After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up for up to 5 years.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Invasive Breast Carcinoma Stage I Breast Cancer AJCC v7 Stage IA Breast Cancer AJCC v7 Stage IB Breast Cancer AJCC v7 Stage II Breast Cancer AJCC v6 and v7 Stage IIA Breast Cancer AJCC v6 and v7 Stage IIB Breast Cancer AJCC v6 and v7 Stage III Breast Cancer AJCC v7 Stage IIIA Breast Cancer AJCC v7 Stage IIIB Breast Cancer AJCC v7 Stage IIIC Breast Cancer AJCC v7 Triple-Negative Breast Carcinoma

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Arm A (predictive results given)

Patients undergo baseline molecular and IHC evaluation of their tumor biopsy, and receive the results. Patients then receive standard anthracycline-based chemotherapy and undergo standard ultrasound at baseline, after 2 cycles, after 4 cycles of treatment, and after completion of treatment (before surgery). Patients and physicians are notified of the results of the molecular evaluation. Patients may then choose to continue with standard taxane +/- platinum-based chemotherapy or participate in an experimental clinical trial designed to match the molecular profile and triple-negative subtype. Patients with tumors predicted to be insensitive to chemotherapy are advised to participate in a clinical trial treating their tumor subtype.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Chemotherapy

Intervention Type DRUG

Receive standard chemotherapy

Laboratory Biomarker Analysis

Intervention Type OTHER

Correlative studies

Lymph Node Biopsy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Undergo baseline lymph node evaluation

Ultrasonography

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Undergo standard ultrasound

Arm B (predictive results given)

Patients undergo baseline molecular and IHC evaluation of their tumor biopsy, and receive the results. Patients then receive standard anthracycline-based chemotherapy and undergo standard ultrasound at baseline, after 2 cycles, and after 4 cycles of treatment. Patients and physicians are notified of the results of the molecular evaluation. Patients may then choose to continue with standard taxane +/- platinum-based chemotherapy or participate in an experimental clinical trial designed to match the molecular profile and triple-negative subtype. Patients with tumors predicted to be insensitive to chemotherapy are advised to participate in a clinical trial treating their tumor subtype.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Chemotherapy

Intervention Type DRUG

Receive standard chemotherapy

Laboratory Biomarker Analysis

Intervention Type OTHER

Correlative studies

Lymph Node Biopsy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Undergo baseline lymph node evaluation

Ultrasonography

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Undergo standard ultrasound

Arm C (predictive results given)

Patients undergo baseline molecular and IHC evaluation of their tumor biopsy, and receive the results. Patients then receive standard anthracycline-based chemotherapy with immunotherapy and undergo standard ultrasound at baseline, after 2 cycles, and after 4 cycles of treatment. Patients and physicians are notified of the results of the molecular evaluation. Patients may then choose to continue with standard taxane +/- platinum-based chemotherapy or participate in an experimental clinical trial designed to match the molecular profile and triple-negative subtype. Patients with tumors predicted to be insensitive to chemotherapy are advised to participate in a clinical trial treating their tumor subtype

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Chemotherapy

Intervention Type DRUG

Receive standard chemotherapy

Immunotherapy

Intervention Type OTHER

Receive standard immunotherapy

Laboratory Biomarker Analysis

Intervention Type OTHER

Correlative studies

Lymph Node Biopsy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Undergo baseline lymph node evaluation

Ultrasonography

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Undergo standard ultrasound

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Chemotherapy

Receive standard chemotherapy

Intervention Type DRUG

Immunotherapy

Receive standard immunotherapy

Intervention Type OTHER

Laboratory Biomarker Analysis

Correlative studies

Intervention Type OTHER

Lymph Node Biopsy

Undergo baseline lymph node evaluation

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Ultrasonography

Undergo standard ultrasound

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Chemo Chemotherapy (NOS) Chemotherapy, Cancer, General Immunological Immunological Therapy Immunologically Directed Therapy Biopsy of Lymph Node 2-Dimensional Grayscale Ultrasound Imaging 2-Dimensional Ultrasound Imaging 2D-US Ultrasound Ultrasound Imaging Ultrasound Test Ultrasound, Medical US

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* The patient can undergo biopsy or surgery of a primary tumor site for suspected or proven invasive breast cancer of clinical stage I to III and are planned to receive neoadjuvant therapy with anthracycline/taxane based regimens (Arm A and Arm B) or chemotherapy/immunotherapy-based regimens (Arm C)
* The patient was proven to have TNBC, defined from standard pathologic assays as negative for ER and PR (\< 10% tumor staining) and negative for HER2 (immunohistochemistry \[IHC\] score \< 3, gene copy number not amplified)
* Patients must have left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) \>= 50% by multi gated acquisition scan (MUGA) or echocardiogram (ECHO) within 12 weeks prior to starting adriamycin
* Leukocytes \> 3,000/mcL
* Absolute neutrophil count \> 1,500/mcL
* Platelets \> 100,000/mcL
* Total bilirubin =\< 1.5 x upper limit of normal (ULN)
* Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) (serum glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase \[SGOT\])/alanine aminotransferase (ALT) (serum glutamate pyruvate transaminase \[SGPT\]) \< 2.5 x institutional upper limit of normal
* Creatinine within 1.5 X the upper limits of normal OR creatinine clearance \> 60 mL/min/1.73 m\^2 for patients with creatinine levels above institutional normal
* For Arms A and B, patients must be medically ineligible to receive immunotherapy in combination with anthracycline/taxane-based chemotherapy as part of standard care
* For Arm C, patients must be medically eligible to receive immunotherapy in combination with chemotherapy as part of standard of care

Exclusion Criteria

* The patient has diagnosis of stage IV disease or is found to have stage IV disease prior to initiation of chemotherapy
* Prior history of invasive cancer within 5 years of study entry or history of metastatic cancer; exceptions include non-metastatic, curatively treated basal and squamous cell carcinoma of the skin
* Prior excisional biopsy of the primary invasive breast cancer
* Patients with hematomas or biopsy site changes that limit response assessment of the primary tumor by diagnostic imaging
* Patients not eligible for chemotherapy with taxane and/or anthracycline based chemotherapy regimens
* Prior therapy with - chemotherapy and/or immunotherapy
* Grade II or higher neuropathy
* Patients with Zubrod performance status of \> 2
* Patients with history of serious cardiac events defined as:

* Patients with a history of New York Heart Association class 3 or 4 heart failure, or history of myocardial infarction, unstable angina or cerebrovascular accident (CVA) within 6 months of protocol registration
* Patients who have history of PR prolongation (grade 2 or higher) or atrioventricular (AV) block
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Cancer Institute (NCI)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

M.D. Anderson Cancer Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Clinton Yam

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

M.D. Anderson Cancer Center

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

MD Anderson in The Woodlands

Conroe, Texas, United States

Site Status

M D Anderson Cancer Center

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

MD Anderson West Houston

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

MD Anderson League City

League City, Texas, United States

Site Status

MD Anderson in Sugar Land

Sugar Land, Texas, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Wang X, Zhao L, Song X, Wu X, Krishnamurthy S, Semba T, Shao S, Knafl M, Coffer LW 2nd, Alexander A, Vines A, Bopparaju S, Woodward WA, Chu R, Zhang J, Yam C, Loo LWM, Nasrazadani A, Huong LP, Woodman SE, Futreal A; Rare Tumor Initiative Team; Tripathy D, Ueno NT. Genomic and transcriptomic analyses identify distinctive features of triple-negative inflammatory breast cancer. NPJ Precis Oncol. 2024 Nov 18;8(1):265. doi: 10.1038/s41698-024-00729-0.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 39558017 (View on PubMed)

Stowers CE, Wu C, Xu Z, Kumar S, Yam C, Son JB, Ma J, Tamir JI, Rauch GM, Yankeelov TE. Combining Biology-based and MRI Data-driven Modeling to Predict Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients with Triple-Negative Breast Cancer. Radiol Artif Intell. 2025 Jan;7(1):e240124. doi: 10.1148/ryai.240124.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 39503605 (View on PubMed)

Basho RK, Zhao L, White JB, Huo L, Bassett RL, Mittendorf EA, Thompson A, Litton JK, Ueno N, Arun B, Lim B, Valero V, Tripathy D, Zhang J, Adrada BE, Santiago L, Ravenberg E, Seth S, Yam C, Moulder SL, Damodaran S. Comprehensive Analysis Identifies Variability in PI3K Pathway Alterations in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Subtypes. JCO Precis Oncol. 2024 Mar;8:e2300124. doi: 10.1200/PO.23.00124.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 38484209 (View on PubMed)

Chen H, Ding Q, Khazai L, Zhao L, Damodaran S, Litton JK, Rauch GM, Yam C, Chang JT, Seth S, Lim B, Thompson AM, Mittendorf EA, Adrada B, Virani K, White JB, Ravenberg E, Song X, Candelaria R, Arun B, Ueno NT, Santiago L, Saleem S, Abouharb S, Murthy RK, Ibrahim N, Routbort MJ, Sahin A, Valero V, Symmans WF, Tripathy D, Wang WL, Moulder S, Huo L. PTEN in triple-negative breast carcinoma: protein expression and genomic alteration in pretreatment and posttreatment specimens. Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2023 Aug 2;15:17588359231189422. doi: 10.1177/17588359231189422. eCollection 2023.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 37547448 (View on PubMed)

Hwang KP, Elshafeey NA, Kotrotsou A, Chen H, Son JB, Boge M, Mohamed RM, Abdelhafez AH, Adrada BE, Panthi B, Sun J, Musall BC, Zhang S, Candelaria RP, White JB, Ravenberg EE, Tripathy D, Yam C, Litton JK, Huo L, Thompson AM, Wei P, Yang WT, Pagel MD, Ma J, Rauch GM. A Radiomics Model Based on Synthetic MRI Acquisition for Predicting Neoadjuvant Systemic Treatment Response in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer. Radiol Imaging Cancer. 2023 Jul;5(4):e230009. doi: 10.1148/rycan.230009.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 37505106 (View on PubMed)

Wu C, Jarrett AM, Zhou Z, Elshafeey N, Adrada BE, Candelaria RP, Mohamed RMM, Boge M, Huo L, White JB, Tripathy D, Valero V, Litton JK, Yam C, Son JB, Ma J, Rauch GM, Yankeelov TE. MRI-Based Digital Models Forecast Patient-Specific Treatment Responses to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer. Cancer Res. 2022 Sep 16;82(18):3394-3404. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-22-1329.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 35914239 (View on PubMed)

Yam C, Abuhadra N, Sun R, Adrada BE, Ding QQ, White JB, Ravenberg EE, Clayborn AR, Valero V, Tripathy D, Damodaran S, Arun BK, Litton JK, Ueno NT, Murthy RK, Lim B, Baez L, Li X, Buzdar AU, Hortobagyi GN, Thompson AM, Mittendorf EA, Rauch GM, Candelaria RP, Huo L, Moulder SL, Chang JT. Molecular Characterization and Prospective Evaluation of Pathologic Response and Outcomes with Neoadjuvant Therapy in Metaplastic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2022 Jul 1;28(13):2878-2889. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-21-3100.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 35507014 (View on PubMed)

Yam C, Yen EY, Chang JT, Bassett RL, Alatrash G, Garber H, Huo L, Yang F, Philips AV, Ding QQ, Lim B, Ueno NT, Kannan K, Sun X, Sun B, Parra Cuentas ER, Symmans WF, White JB, Ravenberg E, Seth S, Guerriero JL, Rauch GM, Damodaran S, Litton JK, Wargo JA, Hortobagyi GN, Futreal A, Wistuba II, Sun R, Moulder SL, Mittendorf EA. Immune Phenotype and Response to Neoadjuvant Therapy in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2021 Oct 1;27(19):5365-5375. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-21-0144.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 34253579 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

NCI-2015-00191

Identifier Type: REGISTRY

Identifier Source: secondary_id

2014-0185

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

P30CA016672

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

2014-0185

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.