Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
194 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2014-04-30
2016-04-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Peer Mentoring for Persons With Spinal Cord Injury (SCI)
NCT00205205
A Patient-centered Approach to Successful Community Transition After Catastrophic Injury
NCT02746978
Caring Connections: A Program to Alleviate Social Isolation and Loneliness in Individuals Living With Spinal Cord Injury
NCT05295108
Health Interventions for Survivors and Primary Support Persons of Spinal Cord Injury
NCT00148239
Enhancing Self-Efficacy for Caregivers of Family Members With Spinal Cord Injury
NCT02392052
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Each recruited volunteer mentor, along with Shepherd Center peer mentor employees, participated in the Christopher and Dana Reeve Foundation peer support mentor training program to help ensure quality interactions with Shepherd Center patients and understand/practice patient confidentiality awareness. This Foundation provides training on a national level by breaking up the country into eight regions - each with a regional coordinator and training program schedule. The faculty and staff of the University of New Mexico developed and maintain the training and certification program, including the mentor management system. The certification program is a "hybrid" program - a series of on-line modules followed by a one-day on-site session. On-line learning is great for conveying information. It saves time and allows everyone to get that information at their own pace. The one-day training session revisits topics covered in the on-line modules: effective peer mentoring, ethics, communication and resources. It includes breakout groups and group discussions. Benefits of partnering with the Foundation, including providing access to certified peer mentors for patients who live outside the Atlanta area are outlined in the attached document (ReevePeer Partnerships.pdf).
A special training session for Shepherd employees/volunteers involved:
1. Part 1: 3-hour on-line course (notification has been sent to potential mentors by CDRF)
2. Part 2: 6-hour face-to-face training meeting at Shepherd Center on March 10, 2014 These training sessions typically are run on a regional basis, so having the program here at Shepherd saved travel expenses and time for the volunteer participants. The PowerPoint used for the March 10 session is attached.
Subjects in the control group received traditional peer support provided by Shepherd Center currently:
1. Within 5-10 days of admission, the patient is introduced to the peer support team.
2. Patients are seen by peer mentors on a referral basis from therapists, nurses, counselors, or physicians or on request from the patient or family.
3. Patients are made aware of monthly peer support meetings, women's groups and caregiver support groups; participation in these groups is optional for patient and/or family.
4. Patients have access to the SCI Peer Support FaceBook page maintained by the Shepherd Peer Mentors
Subjects in the intervention group (and his/her family) received the enhanced One-on-One initiative:
1. Patient was assigned one primary certified peer mentor and 2-3 supplemental mentors to meet individual patient/family needs (if needed). The Peer Support Supervisor matched certified peer mentors with each patient based on characteristics such as age, date of injury, level of injury, cause of injury, marital status, work status before and after injury, interests, leisure activities, and adaptive equipment utilization. Secondary mentors were used to supplement individual patient/family needs. For example, if guidance is needed regarding airline travel, a peer mentor who has mastered airline travel was consulted if the primary peer mentor did not have this experience.
2. Each patient/family evaluated the interaction with his/her peer mentors. PCORI interviewers facilitated completion of this evaluation. Evaluations were reviewed within one week post completion to modify support provided if indicated and ensure that patient/family needs were met.
3. Patients participated in male and female discussion groups, community dinner, and caregiver dinner sponsored by the peer team. Each meeting includes opportunities for discussion in group settings.These meetings are included in the patients' schedules.
4. Peer mentors provide and organize social networking opportunities on FaceBook (Shepherd SCI peers page), CDRF, SCILife, SPINALpedia, facingdisabilities.com,etc.
On the Shepherd SCI Peers Facebook page, the peer mentor supervisor posts questions posed by patients or community members anonymously and feedback volunteered from any of the \>2000 Facebook friends.This is especially helpful for sensitive topics that people may not want to be associated with initiating the question.
Evaluation All study patients were interviewed during the 10th-15th day of their stay at Shepherd Center and completed the Self Efficacy scale. Patients were contacted post via telephone at 3, 30, 90 and 180 days post discharge. At each of these times, they were asked healthcare utilization and Self Efficacy questions.
R
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Intervention
Intervention group receiving one-to-one peer mentoring
one-to-one peer mentoring
Each patient received one-to-one peer mentoring each week during rehabilitation and for 90 days post discharge
Control
Control group receiving general peer support
general peer support
General (traditional) peer support includes introduction and provision of support services upon request
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
one-to-one peer mentoring
Each patient received one-to-one peer mentoring each week during rehabilitation and for 90 days post discharge
general peer support
General (traditional) peer support includes introduction and provision of support services upon request
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* • Discharged from Shepherd Center to non-community setting
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Shepherd Center, Atlanta GA
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Julie Gassaway
Direct Wellness Research
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Michael Jones, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
VP Clinical Research
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Gassaway J, Jones ML, Sweatman WM, Hong M, Anziano P, DeVault K. Effects of Peer Mentoring on Self-Efficacy and Hospital Readmission After Inpatient Rehabilitation of Individuals With Spinal Cord Injury: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2017 Aug;98(8):1526-1534.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2017.02.018. Epub 2017 Mar 23.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
581327-1
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.