Dead Space Closure With Quilting Suture Versus Conventional Closure With Drainage
NCT ID: NCT02263651
Last Updated: 2018-10-22
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
320 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2014-10-31
2018-10-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Investigating the Use of Drains and (Internal) Quilting Sutures on Seroma Formation Following Mastectomy
NCT02668263
Quilting Sutures After Mastectomy
NCT06415032
Effect of Quilting Sutures on Post-operative Drainage After Mastectomy and/or Axillary Lymph Node Dissection
NCT03902977
PREvention of Post-mastectomy LYMphoceles by PAdding
NCT02894021
Prospective Clinical Investigation Comparing Standard Wound Closure Technique With Drains (Control) to Standard Wound Closure Techniques With TissuGlu® and No Drains (Test) in Mastectomy
NCT02958449
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Randomization will be stratified by center and by type of surgery (mastectomy alone/ mastectomy with sentinel node biopsy / mastectomy with axillary lymph node dissection).
Two follow-up visits will be performed: at 21 days and 9 months after surgery, these appointments are conventional, thus our trial will not modify usual follow-up.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Closure with conventional technique with drainage
The skin flaps are not fixed subcutaneously but sutured at the edges, a closed suction drain is inserted under the flaps in the dead space created by the dissection at the pectoral area. The drain is stitched to the skin.
Conventional closure with drainage
The skin flaps are not fixed subcutaneously but sutured at the edges, a closed suction drain is inserted under the flaps in the dead space created by the dissection at the pectoral area. The drain is stitched to the skin.
The skin is closed in two layers with absorbable sutures, a deep layer of 2.0 or 3.0 vicryl sutures or equivalent, and a subcuticular closure with absorbable 3.0 or 4.0 Monocryl sutures or equivalent.
Quilting suture without drainage
In an attempt to obliterate the dead space, the skin flaps are sutured to the underlying pectoralis major with multiple parallel rows of 0/0 vicryl (or equivalent). Running sutures at periodic intervals (\<2cm) are placed from the skin flaps to the underlying muscle.
Quilting suture without drainage
In an attempt to obliterate the dead space, the skin flaps are sutured to the underlying pectoralis major with multiple parallel rows of 0/0 vicryl (or equivalent). Running sutures at periodic intervals (\<2cm) are placed from the skin flaps to the underlying muscle. Minor dimpling is considered acceptable and is expected to resolve. If severe dimpling is observed, stitches are removed and replaced.
Efficiency of quilting suture relies on a rigorous repartition of the sutures with a special attention taken to the obliteration of the largest potential dead spaces and the empty axillary apex.
The skin edges are sutured as stated before for the control group. Closed suction will not be used for draining the pectoral area.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Quilting suture without drainage
In an attempt to obliterate the dead space, the skin flaps are sutured to the underlying pectoralis major with multiple parallel rows of 0/0 vicryl (or equivalent). Running sutures at periodic intervals (\<2cm) are placed from the skin flaps to the underlying muscle. Minor dimpling is considered acceptable and is expected to resolve. If severe dimpling is observed, stitches are removed and replaced.
Efficiency of quilting suture relies on a rigorous repartition of the sutures with a special attention taken to the obliteration of the largest potential dead spaces and the empty axillary apex.
The skin edges are sutured as stated before for the control group. Closed suction will not be used for draining the pectoral area.
Conventional closure with drainage
The skin flaps are not fixed subcutaneously but sutured at the edges, a closed suction drain is inserted under the flaps in the dead space created by the dissection at the pectoral area. The drain is stitched to the skin.
The skin is closed in two layers with absorbable sutures, a deep layer of 2.0 or 3.0 vicryl sutures or equivalent, and a subcuticular closure with absorbable 3.0 or 4.0 Monocryl sutures or equivalent.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Women with operable breast cancer (invasive carcinoma and/or carcinoma in situ) for whom mastectomy is recommended or preferred by the patient either alone or in association with sentinel lymph node biopsy or standard level I/II axillary node dissection
* Women that give her informed written consent
* French social security affiliation
Exclusion Criteria
* Women with indication of bilateral mastectomy or immediate reconstruction.
* Degenerative neuromuscular disease with thoracic muscular damage
* Planned ambulatory surgery
18 Years
85 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University Hospital, Tours
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Lobna OULDAMER, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University Hospital, Tours
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Conception Hospital
Marseille, , France
Institut POALI-CALMETTES
Marseille, , France
Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest
Nantes, , France
CHU de Poitiers
Poitiers, , France
Alliance Clinic
Saint-Cyr-sur-Loire, , France
CHRU de Tours
Tours, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Ouldamer L, Bonastre J, Brunet-Houdard S, Body G, Giraudeau B, Caille A. Dead space closure with quilting suture versus conventional closure with drainage for the prevention of seroma after mastectomy for breast cancer (QUISERMAS): protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2016 Apr 4;6(4):e009903. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009903.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2014-A00901-46
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
140730B-12
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
PHRCK13 - LO / QUISERMAS
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.