Development of an Optimal Approach to Return of Results for Next-generation Sequencing for Prenatal Diagnosis

NCT ID: NCT02255825

Last Updated: 2019-06-06

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

WITHDRAWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-10-31

Study Completion Date

2019-06-04

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

To gain knowledge about how patients undergoing prenatal diagnosis for a fetal abnormality understand and react to Whole Genome Sequencing (WGS) testing, so that the investigators can develop more ethical and responsible approach to patient education, counseling, and return of results for patients.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Although whole exome sequencing (WES) was first used for identification of the genetic cause of a disease only in 2009 and whole genome sequencing (WGS) in 2010, and questions remain about their performance as clinical tests, they are already being offered to patients and doctors as a clinical test by several laboratories certified by the US government (14 labs for WES and 5 labs for WGS). The results from WES and WGS can be complex and confusing, even for doctors and scientists who work with this technology on a daily basis; for patients, the process of deciding whether to have WES or WGS testing, undergoing the testing, receiving the results, and trying to use the results for further decision-making could be quite stressful. Currently, this process occurs in an unstandardized fashion, with some patients receiving extensive education and counseling, and others receiving almost none. There is a critical need to identify patient needs and desires in this area, and to develop strategies to satisfy them. The primary goal of this project is to gain knowledge about how patients undergoing prenatal diagnosis for a fetal abnormality understand and react to WGS testing, so that we can develop a more ethical and responsible approach to patient education, counseling, and return of results for patients . In order to do this, we need to evaluate parents' understanding of the utility and limitations of the technology, parents' preferences regarding the types of results they want to receive, and the psychological impact of receiving results from this technology. We will enroll 30 families consisting of a woman carrying a fetus with a major abnormality identified by ultrasound, and the father of the fetus, who have opted for amniocentesis for standard prenatal diagnostic testing (karyotyping, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and/or microarray testing). Half of the families will serve as controls, who will only have standard prenatal diagnostic testing. For the other half of the families, WGS will be performed in addition to standard diagnostic testing. For all 30 cases, we will perform psychosocial evaluations (including assessments of the subjects' mood, understanding of the technology and preferences for return of results) at the time of enrollment, at the time of return of CLIA-certified genetic testing results (karyotype, FISH, microarray, and/or WGS), and after completion of the pregnancy. In this way, we will learn whether participants are receiving adequate education about next-generation sequencing to make informed choices, what the range of preferences are for return of results in a prenatal population (and whether this changes when new methods for prenatal diagnosis are employed), and whether the use of WGS imposes additional psychological stress compared to standard prenatal diagnostic tests. This study will be carried out in a stepwise and carefully monitored environment, with progress overseen by an Independent Data Monitoring Committee in order to maximize the knowledge gained while minimizing potential harms.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Major Fetal Anomaly

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Control Group

Amniocentesis will be performed, Whole Genome Sequencing will not be performed, and psychosocial assessment will be performed.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Amniocentesis

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Note: this is being performed on all subjects as a clinical (not research) procedure

Psychosocial assessment

Intervention Type OTHER

Use of EPDS and STAI for assessment of maternal and paternal mood

Intervention Group

Amniocentesis will be performed, Whole Genome Sequencing will be performed if the karyotype is normal, and psychosocial assessment will be performed.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Whole Genome Sequencing

Intervention Type GENETIC

Whole genome sequencing in a CLIA lab and return of results.

Amniocentesis

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Note: this is being performed on all subjects as a clinical (not research) procedure

Psychosocial assessment

Intervention Type OTHER

Use of EPDS and STAI for assessment of maternal and paternal mood

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Whole Genome Sequencing

Whole genome sequencing in a CLIA lab and return of results.

Intervention Type GENETIC

Amniocentesis

Note: this is being performed on all subjects as a clinical (not research) procedure

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Psychosocial assessment

Use of EPDS and STAI for assessment of maternal and paternal mood

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Subject(s) 18 years or older (both mom and father of baby (FOB)
* Subject is undergoing prenatal testing for a major fetal anomaly

Exclusion Criteria

* Mothers or fathers of the affected fetus are under the age of 18 years
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of California, San Diego

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Louise Laurent, MD/PhD

MD/PhD

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

UCSD Health Sciences, Fetal Care and Genetics

San Diego, California, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

140456

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Perinatal Precision Medicine
NCT03211039 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA
Multiple Gestation Study
NCT02278536 COMPLETED