Sedation Strategy and Cognitive Outcome After Critical Illness in Early Childhood
NCT ID: NCT02225041
Last Updated: 2019-06-18
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
360 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2014-08-31
2018-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Hypotheses:
1. Greater exposure to benzodiazepines and/or ketamine will be associated with lower IQ even when controlling for severity of illness, hospital course, and baseline factors. In addition, benzodiazepines and/or ketamine will negatively affect other aspects of neurocognitive function.
2. Younger children exposed to benzodiazepines and/or ketamine will have worse neurocognitive outcomes than older children with similar sedative exposure and severity of illness.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Childhood Anesthesia and Cognitive Function
NCT01359215
A Study to Prevent Infantile Spasms Relapse
NCT06819670
The Potential of a Low Glutamate Diet as a Treatment for Pediatric Epilepsy
NCT04545346
Continued Anticonvulsants After Resolution of Neonatal Seizures: a Patient-centered Comparative Effectiveness Study
NCT02789176
Prevention of N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) Antagonist-induced Psychosis in Kids
NCT00205712
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
An opportunity to increase the understanding of the long-term cognitive effects of sedation during critical illness in children has been provided by the cluster randomized, controlled trial of a sedation protocol, Randomized Evaluation of Sedation Titration for Respiratory Failure (RESTORE), U01 HL086622, PI Curley, 31 sites, n=2,816. This trial determined whether the trial's sedation protocol used at intervention sites decreased the duration of mechanical ventilation and sedative exposure among children with acute respiratory failure due to a primary pulmonary process. Control sites continued usual sedation practice. We collected detailed data on doses and durations of sedative medications, in-hospital course, and post-discharge quality of life.
The purpose of RESTORE-cognition is to determine the relationships between sedative exposure during pediatric critical illness and long-term neurocognitive outcomes. We will assess multiple domains of neurocognitive function 2.5-5 years post-discharge in 500 RESTORE subjects with normal baseline cognitive function aged 2 weeks to 8 years at pediatric intensive care unit admission. In addition, we will study 310 matched, healthy siblings of RESTORE subjects to provide data on an unexposed group with similar baseline biological characteristics and environment. Our goal is to increase our understanding of the relationships between sedative exposure, critical illness, and long-term neurocognitive outcomes in infants and young children.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_CONTROL
CROSS_SECTIONAL
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Age ≤8 years and PCPC=1 at RESTORE PICU admission
* PCPC ≤3 at RESTORE hospital discharge Sibling control subjects
* Age 4 to 17 years at time of testing
* PCPC=1
* Same biological parents as primary subject
* Lives with the primary subject
Exclusion Criteria
* Hospital readmission that includes MV and sedation
* History of cardiac arrest, traumatic brain injury (TBI) with loss of consciousness, genetic disorder, premature birth \<32 weeks gestational age, or birth weight \<2500 g Sibling control subjects
* Adopted or step siblings
* History of MV and sedation, receipt of general anesthesia, cardiac arrest, TBI with loss of consciousness, genetic disorder, premature birth \<32 weeks gestational age, or birth weight \<2500 gm.
30 Months
13 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Institutes of Health (NIH)
NIH
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)
NIH
University of Pennsylvania
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Martha AQ Curley, RN, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Pennsylvania
R. Scott Watson, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Seattle Childrens Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Children's Hospital of Alabama
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
University Medical Center, The University of Arizona
Tucson, Arizona, United States
Children's Hospital and Research Center at Oakland
Oakland, California, United States
Children's Hospital of Orange County
Orange, California, United States
Lucile Salter Packard Children's Hospital at Stanford
Palo Alto, California, United States
University of California Davis Medical Center
Sacramento, California, United States
Children's Hospital at University of California San Francisco Medical Center
San Francisco, California, United States
Connecticut Children's Medical Center
Hartford, Connecticut, United States
Yale-New Haven Children's Hospital
New Haven, Connecticut, United States
Nemours/Alfred I. duPont Hospital for Children
Wilmington, Delaware, United States
Holtz Children's Hospital
Miami, Florida, United States
Florida Hospital for Children
Orlando, Florida, United States
Children's Memorial Hospital, Chicago
Chicago, Illinois, United States
Advocate Hope Children's Hospital
Oak Lawn, Illinois, United States
University of Maryland Hospital for Children
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
Johns Hopkins Children's Center
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
University of Massachusetts Memorial Children's Medical Center
Worcester, Massachusetts, United States
C. S. Mott Children's Hospital of the University of Michigan
Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
Children's Mercy Hospital, Kansas City
Kansas City, Missouri, United States
St. Louis Children's Hospital
St Louis, Missouri, United States
University of Nebraska Medical Center
Omaha, Nebraska, United States
Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center
Lebanon, New Hampshire, United States
Cohen Children's Medical Center of New York
New Hyde Park, New York, United States
The Children's Hospital at Montefiore
The Bronx, New York, United States
Duke Children's Hospital and Health Center
Durham, North Carolina, United States
Doernbecher Children's Hospital
Portland, Oregon, United States
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
Monroe Carell, Jr. Children's Hospital at Vanderbilt
Nashville, Tennessee, United States
Medical City Children's Hospital
Dallas, Texas, United States
Children's Medical Center Dallas
Dallas, Texas, United States
Primary Children's Medical Center
Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Curley MAQ, Watson RS, Cassidy AM, Burns C, Delinger RL, Angus DC, Asaro LA, Wypij D, Beers SR; RESTORE-cognition Study Investigators. Design and rationale of the "Sedation strategy and cognitive outcome after critical illness in early childhood" study. Contemp Clin Trials. 2018 Sep;72:8-15. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2018.07.004. Epub 2018 Jul 11.
Other Identifiers
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.