iPad as a Distraction Tool During Facial Laceration Repair

NCT ID: NCT02217436

Last Updated: 2019-07-23

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

80 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-04-30

Study Completion Date

2015-07-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Children aged 2-12 presenting to the Rady Children's Hospital San Diego (RCHSD) emergency department with facial lacerations requiring suture repair will be eligible to participate in the study. Participating children will be randomized to standard care versus standard care plus iPad use during the procedure. Children's anxiety levels assessed using a validated scale will be measured from video recordings made of the procedure. Parent and provider satisfaction surveys will be completed following the procedure. The primary study aim is to determine how iPad use affects children's anxiety levels during facial laceration repair. The secondary study aim is to determine how iPad use affects parent and provider satisfaction regarding a child's facial laceration repair. Hypothesis is that iPad use decreases children's anxiety levels during facial laceration repair and increases parent and provider satisfaction regarding a child's facial laceration repair.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Anxiety Laceration Repair Children

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

iPad

iPad with age-appropriate applications, videos, and music

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

iPad

Intervention Type DEVICE

iPad with age-appropriate applications, videos, and music

Standard Care

Intervention Type OTHER

All study participants will receive standard care, which consists of procedural explanation and preparation by providers, verbal encouragement and comforting by providers and parents, and topical anesthetic (LET) followed by injectable lidocaine administration (whether one or both of these anesthetics will be used will be determined by the provider prior to randomization).

Standard Care

All study participants will receive standard care, which consists of procedural explanation and preparation by providers, verbal encouragement and comforting by providers and parents, and topical anesthetic (LET) followed by injectable lidocaine administration (whether one or both of these anesthetics will be used will be determined by the provider prior to randomization).

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Standard Care

Intervention Type OTHER

All study participants will receive standard care, which consists of procedural explanation and preparation by providers, verbal encouragement and comforting by providers and parents, and topical anesthetic (LET) followed by injectable lidocaine administration (whether one or both of these anesthetics will be used will be determined by the provider prior to randomization).

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

iPad

iPad with age-appropriate applications, videos, and music

Intervention Type DEVICE

Standard Care

All study participants will receive standard care, which consists of procedural explanation and preparation by providers, verbal encouragement and comforting by providers and parents, and topical anesthetic (LET) followed by injectable lidocaine administration (whether one or both of these anesthetics will be used will be determined by the provider prior to randomization).

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Patients: Male and female children aged 2-12 of all ethnic backgrounds and socioeconomic levels presenting to the emergency department for laceration repair. Children sustaining single, uncomplicated facial lacerations, which can be repaired with basic suture techniques, are eligible for the study. Lacerations repaired using LET cream, lidocaine injection, and LET cream and lidocaine injection are all eligible for the study.
2. Parents of enrolled patients.
3. Providers of enrolled patients: Residents, fellows, attendings, and nurse practitioners serving as the primary provider performing the laceration repair.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Patients: Lacerations to parts of the body other than the face. Children with developmental disabilities. Children with laceration repair requiring sedation. Children with complex lacerations requiring subspecialty repair.
2. Parents and/or providers of children not eligible or enrolled in the study.
3. Providers: Medical students performing the laceration repair.
Minimum Eligible Age

2 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

12 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of California, San Diego

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Amy Williams

Co-Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Bema Bonsu, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of California, San Diego and Rady Children's Hospital San Diego

Amy Williams, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of California, San Diego and Rady Children's Hospital San Diego

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Rady Children's Hospital San Diego

San Diego, California, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Crellin D, Sullivan TP, Babl FE, O'Sullivan R, Hutchinson A. Analysis of the validation of existing behavioral pain and distress scales for use in the procedural setting. Paediatr Anaesth. 2007 Aug;17(8):720-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2007.02218.x.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17596217 (View on PubMed)

Luhmann JD, Kennedy RM, Porter FL, Miller JP, Jaffe DM. A randomized clinical trial of continuous-flow nitrous oxide and midazolam for sedation of young children during laceration repair. Ann Emerg Med. 2001 Jan;37(1):20-7. doi: 10.1067/mem.2001.112003.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 11145766 (View on PubMed)

McQueen A, Cress C, Tothy A. Using a tablet computer during pediatric procedures: a case series and review of the "apps". Pediatr Emerg Care. 2012 Jul;28(7):712-4. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e31825d24eb.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22766593 (View on PubMed)

Sinha M, Christopher NC, Fenn R, Reeves L. Evaluation of nonpharmacologic methods of pain and anxiety management for laceration repair in the pediatric emergency department. Pediatrics. 2006 Apr;117(4):1162-8. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-1100.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16585311 (View on PubMed)

Jay SM, Elliott C. Behavioral observation scales for measuring children's distress: the effects of increased methodological rigor. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1984 Dec;52(6):1106-7. doi: 10.1037//0022-006x.52.6.1106. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 6520283 (View on PubMed)

Bryl AW, Bonsu B, Johnson AL, Pommert KBJ, Hollenbach KA, Kanegaye JT. Tablet Computer as a Distraction Tool During Facial Laceration Repair: A Randomized Trial. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2021 Aug 1;37(8):e425-e430. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000001626.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 30422942 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

iPadWilliams

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Efficacy of Quetiapine for Pediatric Delirium
NCT02056171 TERMINATED PHASE1/PHASE2
Quetiapine Treatment for Pediatric Delirium
NCT03572257 WITHDRAWN PHASE2/PHASE3