The Effect of Feedback Regarding Illness Behavior on Patient Satisfaction in Hand Surgery

NCT ID: NCT02209246

Last Updated: 2014-08-05

Basic Information

• Recruitment Status: COMPLETED
• Clinical Phase: NA
• Total Enrollment: 128 participants
• Study Classification: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Start Date: 2013-07-31

Brief Summary

The investigators of this study would like to see whether providing feedback to patients regarding their illness behavior/coping strategies, using online questionnaires, improves patient-physician communication in orthopaedic surgery. The investigators aim to enroll 128 patients.

Detailed Description

Psychological and sociological factors are important in the human illness experience, but biomedical factors are the focus of most office visits, particularly in hand surgery. Both patients and surgeons can feel uncomfortable discussing emotions, stress, and coping strategies. Detmar et al. randomized patients in an oncology practice to receive feedback on a HRQL assessment or not during office visits. They observed that feedback on the HRQL assessment contributed to physicians' awareness of healthy issues and patient-physician communication. There was a difference in perceived emotional support, but not in overall satisfaction with the visit[1]. A retrospective study observed in patients with local prostate cancer, that pre-therapy HRQL assessment is associated with a better sexual function, sexual bother and bowel function according to post-therapy HRQL scores[2].

The investigators propose a two arm unblended, randomized (1:1) controlled trial to assess the effect of providing feedback to patients regarding illness behavior/coping strategies (using Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Computer Adaptive Testing (CAT) instruments) on patient satisfaction and patient-physician communication in orthopaedic surgery.

If the results of the study suggest that feedback of results from the questionnaires increases patients' satisfaction, such an intervention may be used in the future to benefit future patients.

Aim:

The aim of this study is to assess the effect of feedback regarding illness behavior measured with Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Instrument System - Computerized Adaptive Testing (PROMIS- CAT) on patient satisfaction.

Primary Null Hypothesis:

There is no difference in satisfaction between patients who receive feedback about their illness behavior, measured with PROMIS-CAT, compared to patients who do not.

Secondary Null Hypotheses:

There is no difference in patient-physician communication about patient's illness behavior between patients who receive feedback about their illness behavior, measured with PROMISCAT, compared to patients who do not.

There are no predictors for patient satisfaction.

Conditions

Hand Surgery

Study Design

• Allocation Method: RANDOMIZED
• Primary Study Purpose: HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH

Study Groups

Intervention

The intervention group will be comprised of patients who will complete the PROMIS- CAT for pain interference, pain behavior and physical function prior to the encounter with the physician and then will complete the MISS-21 after the encounter.

Group Type: EXPERIMENTAL

PROMIS CAT Pain Interference

Intervention Type: OTHER

PROMIS CAT Pain Behavior

Intervention Type: OTHER

PROMIS CAT Physical Function

Intervention Type: OTHER

MISS-21

Intervention Type: OTHER

Control

The control group will complete the PROMIS- CAT for pain interference, pain behavior and physical function after the encounter and after completing a satisfaction questionnaire (MISS-21).

Group Type: EXPERIMENTAL

PROMIS CAT Pain Interference

Intervention Type: OTHER

PROMIS CAT Pain Behavior

Intervention Type: OTHER

PROMIS CAT Physical Function

Intervention Type: OTHER

MISS-21

Intervention Type: OTHER

Interventions

PROMIS CAT Pain Interference

Intervention Type: OTHER

PROMIS CAT Pain Behavior

Intervention Type: OTHER

PROMIS CAT Physical Function

Intervention Type: OTHER

MISS-21

Intervention Type: OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

• All new patients visiting the Orthopaedic Hand and Upper Extremity Service
• English fluency and literacy
• Ability to provide informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

• age < 18
• Inability to complete enrollment forms due to any mental status or language problems (e.g. dementia, head injury, overall illness).

• Minimum Eligible Age: 18 Years
• Eligible Sex: ALL
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No

Sponsors

Massachusetts General Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role: lead

Responsible Party

David C. Ring, MD

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

David Ring, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Massachusetts General Hospital

Locations

Massachusetts General Hospital

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Countries

United States

References

Detmar SB, Muller MJ, Schornagel JH, Wever LD, Aaronson NK. Health-related quality-of-life assessments and patient-physician communication: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2002 Dec 18;288(23):3027-34. doi: 10.1001/jama.288.23.3027.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 12479768 (View on PubMed)

Chamie K, Sadetsky N, Litwin MS. Physician assessment of pretreatment functional status: a process-outcomes link. J Urol. 2011 Apr;185(4):1229-33. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2010.11.087. Epub 2011 Feb 22.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 21334026 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

2013P001425

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id