Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
NA
44 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2015-01-01
2017-08-23
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Benchmarking Outcomes in Pancreatic Surgery - WhippleBenchmarks.Org
NCT04053998
Economisation of Whipple Resection Using an Ultrasonic Dissection Device
NCT01321450
Economisation of Whipple Resection Using Electrosurgical Sealing Device
NCT00850291
A Study Comparing Restrictive and Liberal Fluid Therapy During Pancreatecoduodenectomy Surgery
NCT07072897
A Prospective Cohort Study on Ligation of Pancreatic Stump After Distal Pancreatectomy
NCT06814249
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Thunderbeat™ was provided FDA clearance in March 2012 for use in open, laparoscopic, and endoscopic surgery, or in any procedure in which cutting, vessel ligation (sealing and cutting), coagulation, grasping and dissection is performed.
The Thunderbeat™ device provides the first integration of both bipolar and ultrasonic energies delivered simultaneously from a single multi-functional instrument. This integration provides the surgeon the ability to rapidly cut tissue with ultrasonic energy and to create reliable vessel seals with bipolar energy without having to change devices. The current is provided by a special generator and contains a very high capacity with a low voltage. The body's proteins, such as collagen and elastin, are converted so a permanently sealed zone results. As the tissue between the branches is sealed, lateral thermic tissue damages can be limited to a minimum. Several authors have described a tendency of reduced intraoperative blood loss with bipolar energy devices. Other trials show reduced operating time when a bipolar device is utilized in several surgical procedures, such as thyroid, hepatic, urologic, hemorrhoidectomy and gynecology surgery.
Correct dissection in the operating field is very important to avert secondary bleeding or other complications, which might cause re-operation or elevate the patients' morbidity and mortality.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Control Group
In the control group, scissors, ligatures, clips and sutures will be used for dissection and hemostasis as necessary.
Standard of care scissors, ligatures, clips, and sutures
Thunderbeat™
-In the Thunderbeat™ group, dissection and hemostasis of vessels will be performed using the Thunderbeat™ device (Olympus, Japan).
Thunderbeat
Thunderbeat uses ultrasonic and high frequency bipolar energy simultaneously to seal and cut tissue compared to placebo comparator.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Thunderbeat
Thunderbeat uses ultrasonic and high frequency bipolar energy simultaneously to seal and cut tissue compared to placebo comparator.
Standard of care scissors, ligatures, clips, and sutures
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* At least 22 years of age.
* Karnofsky performance status greater than or equal to 80%.
* Able to understand and willing to sign a written informed consent document.
Exclusion Criteria
* Surgeon's opinion at the time of dissection that the subject's well being (e.g. bleeding or other independent acute health problems) would be compromised.
22 Years
75 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Washington University School of Medicine
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
William Hawkins, M.D.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Washington University School of Medicine
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Washington University School of Medicine
St Louis, Missouri, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center at Barnes-Jewish Hospital and Washington University School of Medicine
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
201311146
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.