Enhancing the Efficacy of Smoking Quit Line in the Military (AFIII Renewal)
NCT ID: NCT02201810
Last Updated: 2022-05-26
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
614 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2015-05-31
2020-11-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Evaluating a Telephone-Based Smoking Cessation Program Among People in the Military (The AFIII Study)
NCT00632411
Preventing Relapse Following Involuntary Smoking Abstinence
NCT01374724
Evaluation of a Brief Tobacco Intervention in the US Military
NCT03196102
Implementing Guidelines for Smoking Cessation: A Randomized Trial of Evidence-Based Quality Improvement
NCT00012987
Improving the Delivery of Smoking Cessation Guidelines in Hospitalized Veterans
NCT00816036
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
An opportunity exists to reengage these smokers who relapse or fail to quit by the end of QL treatment. Civilian QLs use one of two treatments, Recycling (repeat the smoking cessation counseling) or Rate Reduction (cut down over time), as the primary methods for treatment reengagement. Unfortunately, these methods of reengaging the relapsed/failed to quit smoker have not been systematically evaluated. As such, we propose to randomize participants who relapse or fail to quit by the end of the intervention to either (1) repeating the proactive QL (Recycle); (2) smoking reduction with the goal of eventual cessation (Rate Reduction); or (3) the choice of Recycle or Rate Reduction (Choice). Efficacy will be established by assessing both point prevalence and continuous abstinence at a 12 month follow-up.
All participants (approximately 1900) are consented to follow-up treatment reengagement since we do not know a priori who will quit and who will not quit/relapse. The investigators anticipate, based on the investigators' QL study that about 30% will quit and remain quit based on the eight-week proactive QL and about 70% will either not quit or relapse (n≈1300). Those that are smoking at the three-month follow-up are stratified (based on whether they quit and relapsed vs. not quitting at all in the Proactive QL based upon self-report) and randomized to the three treatment reengagement strategies (Recycle, Rate Reduction, or Choice), each one lasting 8 weeks. Then, at one year follow-up, the investigators will assess both point prevalence and continuous abstinence. Since we are intervening on those that initially failed to quit or relapsed, continuous abstinence will be defined from the point of the last treatment reengagement intervention (one year from that point).
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
2nd level intervention: Rate Reduction
Rate reduction intervention
Rate reduction intervention
Proactive QL
2nd level intervention: Recycling
Recycling Group
Recycling Group
Proactive QL
2nd level intervention: Choice
Choice Group
Choice Group
Proactive QL
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Rate reduction intervention
Recycling Group
Choice Group
Proactive QL
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Participants must be at least 18 years old
* Smoked five or more cigarettes a day for at least one year
* Live in the 48 contiguous states, Alaska or Hawaii
* Participants must have the ability to understand consent procedures, and have access to a telephone for participation
* Seriously thinking of quitting smoking cigarettes in the next 30 days
Exclusion Criteria
* Women who are pregnant, breastfeeding or planning to become pregnant during the next 12 months
* Persons diagnosed with an unstable heart condition will be excluded as NRT is contraindicated in these groups
18 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Tennessee
OTHER
University of Virginia
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Melissa Little, PhD, MPH
Associate Professor, Department of Public Health Sciences
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Robert Klesges, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
UTHSC
Wayne Talcott, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
UTHSC
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Wilford Hall Ambulatory Surgical Center
Lackland Air Force Base, Texas, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Little MA, Ebbert JO, Bursac Z, Talcott GW, Talley L, LeRoy KM, Womack CR, Hryshko-Mullen AS, Klesges RC. Enhancing the efficacy of a smoking quit line in the military: Study rationale, design and methods of the Freedom quit line. Contemp Clin Trials. 2017 Aug;59:51-56. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2017.04.011. Epub 2017 May 4. No abstract available.
Cassidy DG, Wang XQ, Mallawaarachchi I, Wiseman KP, Ebbert JO, Blue Star JA, Aycock CA, Estevez Burns R, Jones JR, Krunnfusz AE, Halbert JP, Roy NM, Ellis JM, Williams JB, Klesges RC, Talcott GW. Tobacco quitline performance: Comparing the impacts of early cessation and proactive re-engagement on callers' smoking status at follow-up at 12 months. Tob Induc Dis. 2023 Feb 15;21:24. doi: 10.18332/tid/159125. eCollection 2023.
Wiseman KP, Aycock CA, Mallawaarachchi I, Wang XQ, Cassidy DG, Patience MA, Little MA, Talcott GW, Klesges RC. Predictors of Re-Engagement after Relapse in a Tobacco Quit Line Intervention: Secondary Analysis from a Randomized Clinical Trial. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 10;20(2):1229. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20021229.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
FWH20140076H
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.