Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
43 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2014-07-31
2015-05-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Among the challenges of caring for adolescents is the reality that the formative relational influences in adolescents' decision-making are both complex and unique due to adolescent patients' social networks and relational roles. Delineating adolescents' definitions of being a good patient, a good child, a good sibling, and a good friend may enable the care team to better understand the formative decisional influences relevant to adolescents with cancer. Expanding knowledge about the decision making constructs relevant to adolescents with cancer and recognizing the role of these social constructs in medical interactions has the potential for development of a comprehensive care model that methodically evaluates the self-assessed decision making influences and needs of adolescents at various stages in oncology care.
This qualitative construct-defining study represents an initial step in the development of enhanced interventions for improved psychosocial support in this vulnerable population.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
The Decision To Enroll In Therapeutic Clinical Trials In A Pediatric Cancer Clinical Network
NCT05454618
Memantine for Prevention of Cognitive Late Effects in Pediatric Patients Receiving Cranial Radiation Therapy for Localized Brain Tumors
NCT03194906
Protocol For Collecting Data On Patients With Childhood Cancer
NCT00684580
Learning Impairments Among Survivors of Childhood Cancer
NCT00576472
Treatment for Patients With Stage III or IV Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma
NCT00187122
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
* Describe the ways relationships and social interactions may factor into adolescent study participants' approach to decisions;
* By reports from adolescents with cancer, identify behaviors from members of the study participants' social network that would be helpful to adolescents in fulfilling their preferred role in medical decision-making and achieving the desired level of participation in medical decision-making;
* Identify adolescent participants' preferred role in medical decision making.
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:
* Develop definitions of being a "good" patient, child, sibling, and friend from adolescent participant reports (will also welcome the study participant to self-declare any additional relational constructs they may wish to report);
* Describe how the adolescent study participant believes his or her "good" patient, child, sibling, and friend definition may have changed over time;
* Describe the self-assessed positive and negative aspects of trying to achieve the meanings of the "good" patient, child, sibling, and friend constructs from adolescent participant reports;
* Describe the actions of members of the study participant's social network which may help the study participant reach his/her definition of being a "good" patient, child, sibling, and friend.
Participants will participate in a one-time voice-recorded, face-to-face interview consisting of open-ended questions. Completion of the interview is expected to take less than one hour.
The qualitative interview consists of thirty open-ended questions for participants with no siblings and thirty-eight open-ended questions for participants who have siblings. Questions will be audio-recorded, face-to-face semi-structured in-depth interview format. Health information will also be collected from medical records.
Expected accrual is 100 participants, 50 at each participating site. Accrual will be halted when the study reaches qualitative theme saturation. For this study, saturation will occur when three consecutive interviews fail to raise a new theme.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Study Participants
All enrolled participants will take part in a face-to-face interview.
Interview
This study involves teen participants taking part in one private interview with the study team. Interviews last less than one hour and are scheduled at the participant's convenience. Interviews will be audio/digital recorded. Participants may answer any or all of the questions.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Interview
This study involves teen participants taking part in one private interview with the study team. Interviews last less than one hour and are scheduled at the participant's convenience. Interviews will be audio/digital recorded. Participants may answer any or all of the questions.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Participants must have primary care team approval to participate.
* Participants must be English-speaking.
* Participants must carry an oncologic diagnosis.
* Participants must be within four months of initial oncologic diagnosis or within four months of relapse/recurrent disease.
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients who, in the opinion of their physician, are not capable mentally or verbally of participating in the interview, will be excluded from the study.
12 Years
19 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
St. Jude Children's Research Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Meaghann Weaver, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
St. Jude Children's Research Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Children's National Health System
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States
St. Jude Children's Research Hospital
Memphis, Tennessee, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
St. Jude Children's Research Hospital
Clinical Trials Open at St. Jude
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
GPS14
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.