Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE2
296 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2000-03-02
2021-11-05
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Chemotherapy With Low-Dose Radiation for Pediatric Hodgkin Lymphoma
NCT00352027
Pediatric Hodgkin Lymphoma Treatment Trial With Low Cumulative Doses of Chemotherapy Agents and Reduced Radiation.
NCT03500133
Treatment for Patients With Stage III or IV Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma
NCT00187122
Combination Chemotherapy and Radiation Therapy in Treating Young Patients With Newly Diagnosed Hodgkin Lymphoma
NCT01026220
Chemotherapy With or Without Additional Chemotherapy and/or Radiation Therapy in Treating Children With Newly Diagnosed Hodgkin's Disease
NCT00025259
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Primary Objectives:
1. To evaluate the efficacy of 4 cycles of VAMP chemotherapy alone in patients with favorable risk Hodgkin's disease who achieve a complete response after 2 cycles of VAMP chemotherapy.
2. To evaluate the efficacy of 4 cycles VAMP chemotherapy plus low dose RT in patients with favorable risk Hodgkin's disease who achieve a partial response after 2 cycles of VAMP chemotherapy.
3. To evaluate the efficacy of 2 alternating cycles of VAMP/COP chemotherapy (total 4 cycles of chemotherapy) plus low-dose, involved-field RT in children with intermediate risk Hodgkin's disease.
4. To evaluate the efficacy of 12 weeks of Stanford V chemotherapy plus low-dose, involved-field RT in children with unfavorable risk Hodgkin's disease.
Secondary Objectives:
1. To evaluate patient quality of life during and after treatment from the patient and parent perspective.
2. To compare patient and parental ratings of treatment-related symptoms and patient physical, psychological, social and cognitive functioning before the first treatment (T1 - baseline); after Cycle 2 or after 8 weeks of Stanford V (T2 - Evaluate Response); after cycle 4 or after 12 weeks of Stanford V and before or on the first day of radiation (as applicable) (T3); at the conclusion of radiation or within a few days following the end of radiation (as applicable) (T4); and at 3 to 6 months after completion of therapy follow-up evaluation (T5).
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Unfavorable Risk, Group 2
Unfavorable risk, group 2 arm in patients with Hodgkin's disease (n=146)
12 Week Stanford V Chemotherapy
12 weeks of Stanford V chemotherapy plus low-dose, involved-field RT in children
Favorable Risk
Favorable Risk arm in patients with Hodgkin's Disease (n=91).
4 cycles of VAMP chemotherapy
4 cycles of VAMP chemotherapy alone in patients who achieve a complete response after 2 cycles of VAMP chemotherapy. For patients that do not achieve a complete response after 2 cycles of VAMP, they will receive low low-dose involved field radiotherapy at the end of all chemotherapy.
Intermediate Risk
Intermediate Arm in patients with Hodgkins's disease (n=46).
2 alternating cycles of VAMP/COP chemotherapy
2 alternating cycles of VAMP/COP chemotherapy (total 4 cycles of chemotherapy) plus low-dose, involved-field RT.
Unfavorable Risk, Group 1
Unfavorable risk group 1 closed early due to excessive number of adverse events (n=13).
3 alternating cycles of VAMP/COP chemotherapy
3 alternating cycles of VAMP/COP chemotherapy (total 6 cycles of chemotherapy) plus low-dose, involved-field RT
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
12 Week Stanford V Chemotherapy
12 weeks of Stanford V chemotherapy plus low-dose, involved-field RT in children
4 cycles of VAMP chemotherapy
4 cycles of VAMP chemotherapy alone in patients who achieve a complete response after 2 cycles of VAMP chemotherapy. For patients that do not achieve a complete response after 2 cycles of VAMP, they will receive low low-dose involved field radiotherapy at the end of all chemotherapy.
2 alternating cycles of VAMP/COP chemotherapy
2 alternating cycles of VAMP/COP chemotherapy (total 4 cycles of chemotherapy) plus low-dose, involved-field RT.
3 alternating cycles of VAMP/COP chemotherapy
3 alternating cycles of VAMP/COP chemotherapy (total 6 cycles of chemotherapy) plus low-dose, involved-field RT
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients must be 21 years of age or younger
* Ann Arbor stages IIB-IV
* No prior treatment.
* No pregnant or lactating women.
* Signed informed consent
* If re-evaluation of a patient's disease shows favorable risk features or intermediate risk features, the patient will be removed from the HOD99 study and consented to the respective HOD08 or HOD05 study.
Inclusion: treatment of favorable risk features:
* Ann Arbor IA or IIA with:
1. Non-bulky mediastinal disease (\<33% mediastinal to thoracic ratio on chest x ray)
2. Ann Arbor stage IA or IIA with any of the following features: (1) "E" lesions (s), (2) 3 or more nodal sites involved, (3) Bulky mediastinal adenopathy (mediastinal mass to thoracic cavity ratio 33% or greater by chest radiograph)
Inclusion: unfavorable risk features:
* Stage must be classified as one of the following:
1. Ann Arbor stage IIB, IIIB, or any IV
21 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
St. Jude Children's Research Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Jamie Flerlage, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
St. Jude Children's Research Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Stanford University
Palo Alto, California, United States
Maine Children's Cancer Program
Portland, Maine, United States
Dana Farber Cancer Institute
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Massachusetts General Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
St. Jude Children's Research Hospital
Memphis, Tennessee, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Metzger ML, Weinstein HJ, Hudson MM, Billett AL, Larsen EC, Friedmann A, Howard SC, Donaldson SS, Krasin MJ, Kun LE, Marcus KJ, Yock TI, Tarbell N, Billups CA, Wu J, Link MP. Association between radiotherapy vs no radiotherapy based on early response to VAMP chemotherapy and survival among children with favorable-risk Hodgkin lymphoma. JAMA. 2012 Jun 27;307(24):2609-16. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.5847.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
St. Jude Children's Research Hospital
Clinical Trials Open at St. Jude
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
NCI-2011-03721
Identifier Type: REGISTRY
Identifier Source: secondary_id
HOD99
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.