Therapy for Pediatric Hodgkin Lymphoma

NCT ID: NCT00145600

Last Updated: 2022-10-20

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

296 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2000-03-02

Study Completion Date

2021-11-05

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

With the success of current chemotherapy for Hodgkin's disease, the goal of this protocol is to maintain the currently successful cure rate and reduce treatment related side effects and long term toxicity. The main purpose of this study is to estimate the event free survival of patients treated with risk-adapted therapy compared to historical controls.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This study will evaluate the following objectives:

Primary Objectives:

1. To evaluate the efficacy of 4 cycles of VAMP chemotherapy alone in patients with favorable risk Hodgkin's disease who achieve a complete response after 2 cycles of VAMP chemotherapy.
2. To evaluate the efficacy of 4 cycles VAMP chemotherapy plus low dose RT in patients with favorable risk Hodgkin's disease who achieve a partial response after 2 cycles of VAMP chemotherapy.
3. To evaluate the efficacy of 2 alternating cycles of VAMP/COP chemotherapy (total 4 cycles of chemotherapy) plus low-dose, involved-field RT in children with intermediate risk Hodgkin's disease.
4. To evaluate the efficacy of 12 weeks of Stanford V chemotherapy plus low-dose, involved-field RT in children with unfavorable risk Hodgkin's disease.

Secondary Objectives:

1. To evaluate patient quality of life during and after treatment from the patient and parent perspective.
2. To compare patient and parental ratings of treatment-related symptoms and patient physical, psychological, social and cognitive functioning before the first treatment (T1 - baseline); after Cycle 2 or after 8 weeks of Stanford V (T2 - Evaluate Response); after cycle 4 or after 12 weeks of Stanford V and before or on the first day of radiation (as applicable) (T3); at the conclusion of radiation or within a few days following the end of radiation (as applicable) (T4); and at 3 to 6 months after completion of therapy follow-up evaluation (T5).

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Hodgkin Lymphoma

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Unfavorable Risk, Group 2

Unfavorable risk, group 2 arm in patients with Hodgkin's disease (n=146)

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

12 Week Stanford V Chemotherapy

Intervention Type DRUG

12 weeks of Stanford V chemotherapy plus low-dose, involved-field RT in children

Favorable Risk

Favorable Risk arm in patients with Hodgkin's Disease (n=91).

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

4 cycles of VAMP chemotherapy

Intervention Type DRUG

4 cycles of VAMP chemotherapy alone in patients who achieve a complete response after 2 cycles of VAMP chemotherapy. For patients that do not achieve a complete response after 2 cycles of VAMP, they will receive low low-dose involved field radiotherapy at the end of all chemotherapy.

Intermediate Risk

Intermediate Arm in patients with Hodgkins's disease (n=46).

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

2 alternating cycles of VAMP/COP chemotherapy

Intervention Type DRUG

2 alternating cycles of VAMP/COP chemotherapy (total 4 cycles of chemotherapy) plus low-dose, involved-field RT.

Unfavorable Risk, Group 1

Unfavorable risk group 1 closed early due to excessive number of adverse events (n=13).

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

3 alternating cycles of VAMP/COP chemotherapy

Intervention Type DRUG

3 alternating cycles of VAMP/COP chemotherapy (total 6 cycles of chemotherapy) plus low-dose, involved-field RT

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

12 Week Stanford V Chemotherapy

12 weeks of Stanford V chemotherapy plus low-dose, involved-field RT in children

Intervention Type DRUG

4 cycles of VAMP chemotherapy

4 cycles of VAMP chemotherapy alone in patients who achieve a complete response after 2 cycles of VAMP chemotherapy. For patients that do not achieve a complete response after 2 cycles of VAMP, they will receive low low-dose involved field radiotherapy at the end of all chemotherapy.

Intervention Type DRUG

2 alternating cycles of VAMP/COP chemotherapy

2 alternating cycles of VAMP/COP chemotherapy (total 4 cycles of chemotherapy) plus low-dose, involved-field RT.

Intervention Type DRUG

3 alternating cycles of VAMP/COP chemotherapy

3 alternating cycles of VAMP/COP chemotherapy (total 6 cycles of chemotherapy) plus low-dose, involved-field RT

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Eligible patients must have histologically confirmed previously untreated Hodgkin's disease (Patients receiving limited emergent RT or steroid therapy because of cardiopulmonary decompensation or spinal cord compression will be eligible for protocol enrollment).
* Patients must be 21 years of age or younger
* Ann Arbor stages IIB-IV
* No prior treatment.
* No pregnant or lactating women.
* Signed informed consent
* If re-evaluation of a patient's disease shows favorable risk features or intermediate risk features, the patient will be removed from the HOD99 study and consented to the respective HOD08 or HOD05 study.

Inclusion: treatment of favorable risk features:

* Ann Arbor IA or IIA with:

1. Non-bulky mediastinal disease (\<33% mediastinal to thoracic ratio on chest x ray)
2. Ann Arbor stage IA or IIA with any of the following features: (1) "E" lesions (s), (2) 3 or more nodal sites involved, (3) Bulky mediastinal adenopathy (mediastinal mass to thoracic cavity ratio 33% or greater by chest radiograph)

Inclusion: unfavorable risk features:
* Stage must be classified as one of the following:

1. Ann Arbor stage IIB, IIIB, or any IV
Maximum Eligible Age

21 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

St. Jude Children's Research Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Jamie Flerlage, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

St. Jude Children's Research Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Stanford University

Palo Alto, California, United States

Site Status

Maine Children's Cancer Program

Portland, Maine, United States

Site Status

Dana Farber Cancer Institute

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Massachusetts General Hospital

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

St. Jude Children's Research Hospital

Memphis, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Metzger ML, Weinstein HJ, Hudson MM, Billett AL, Larsen EC, Friedmann A, Howard SC, Donaldson SS, Krasin MJ, Kun LE, Marcus KJ, Yock TI, Tarbell N, Billups CA, Wu J, Link MP. Association between radiotherapy vs no radiotherapy based on early response to VAMP chemotherapy and survival among children with favorable-risk Hodgkin lymphoma. JAMA. 2012 Jun 27;307(24):2609-16. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.5847.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 22735430 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

http://www.stjude.org

St. Jude Children's Research Hospital

http://www.stjude.org/protocols

Clinical Trials Open at St. Jude

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

NCI-2011-03721

Identifier Type: REGISTRY

Identifier Source: secondary_id

HOD99

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.