Staged Bilateral Carpal Tunnel Release: Which Side Hurts More?
NCT ID: NCT02198521
Last Updated: 2017-02-03
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
WITHDRAWN
OBSERVATIONAL
2014-07-31
2016-09-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Secondary null hypotheses
* There is no correlation in overall pain intensity after open CTR surgery and distal sensory latency, distal motor latency, electromyography (EMG), demographics, occupation, avocation, relevant comorbidities, dominance, left vs. right, Pain Self-Efficacy, Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Upper Extremity or PROMIS depression when both surgeries are performed within 6 months.
* There is no difference in satisfaction with treatment at the time of suture removal after the first and second open CTR surgery when both are performed within 6 months..
IRB: 2009-p-001-019 ClinicalTrials.gov: Not mandatory, (b/o observational) Authors: Drijkoningen, Braun, Ring Journal: To be discussed Design: Prospective cohort study Background Many hand surgeons note that patients undergoing staged bilateral open carpal tunnel release often experience more pain with the second side. The investigator felt this was an easily testable hypothesis worthy of study.
Subjects
Eligibility:
Inclusion:
* Age 18 or older
* Idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome
* No prior surgery for carpal tunnel syndrome
Exclude:
* Pregnant women
* Not fluent in English
Response Variables:
* 11-point ordinal measure of overall pain intensity during and after surgery measured at the time of suture removal.
* 11-point ordinal measure of satisfaction with treatment
* PROMIS upper extremity
Explanatory Variables:
* Distal Sensory Latency (DSL)
* Distal Motor Latency (DML)
* EMG changes
* Demographics: age, sex, race, occupation, avocation
* Time limit between two surgeries \< 6 months
* Relevant comorbidities: Trapeziometacarpal (TMC) arthrosis, ulnar neuropathy, trigger finger
* Involved hand (Dominance, Side)
* First side vs. second side surgery
* PROMIS Pain Interference Computer Adaptive Testing (CAT)
* Pain Self Efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ-2)
* PROMIS Depression
Methods The investigator and study staff will invite all adult patients (age 18 and older) presenting to the Orthopaedic Hand and Upper Extremity Service Department at Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) with bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome planning staged bilateral carpal tunnel release.
Analysis Power analysis An a priori power analysis for matched pairs was performed. To detect the difference between two dependent means an effect size of 0.5 at alpha of 0.05 and 80% power, a total sample size of 34 patients is needed.As the investigator expects to have patients who will be lost to follow-up the investigators will count 10% extra, a total of 38 patients will be needed.
Univariate analysis: Variables will be presented with frequencies and percentages for categorical variables and as mean with standard deviation or median with interquartile range for respectively normal or non-normal distributed continuous variables. Normality of continuous distributed variables will be tested a paired T-Test.
Bivariate and multivariable analysis will be performed and subsequently all variables with a probability \< 0.10 in bivariate analysis will be inserted in a backward, stepwise, multivariable linear regression analysis to assess their ability to explain variation in outcome. The 11 point Likert Pain scale score is considered significant when there is a difference of more than 1.4 points (2.8 SD\*0.5 effect size)on a scale from 1-10.\[9\]
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Bilateral vs Unilateral CTR
NCT01961011
Comparison of Local Only Anesthesia Versus Sedation in Patients Undergoing Bilateral Carpal Tunnel Release
NCT03495466
Dual Task During Resistance Training in CTR
NCT05592184
The Use of Ultrasound to Quantify Muscle Overlying the Carpal Tunnel
NCT02683343
Testing of a Tool to Elicit Patient Preferences for CTS
NCT03532373
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Bilateral Carpal Tunnel Syndrome (CTS)
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome
* No prior surgery for carpal tunnel syndrome
Exclusion Criteria
* Not fluent in English
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Massachusetts General Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
David C. Ring, MD
MD/PhD
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Massachusetts General Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2009P001019 AME 339
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.