Comparison of MEOPA + Paracetamol Versus Morphine Treatment in Acute Coronary Syndrome Analgesia.
NCT ID: NCT02198378
Last Updated: 2018-02-05
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
680 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2014-11-30
2017-01-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Intravenous Acetaminophen and Morphine Versus Intravenous Morphine Alone for Acute Pain in the Emergency Department
NCT04148495
International Prospective Study on Morphine-induced Adverse Drug Reactions in Emergency Departments.
NCT01654055
Efficacy of Paracetamol in Addition to Morphine to Improve Analgesia in the Emergency Department
NCT03843281
Effectiveness of New Analgesic Strategy Compared to the Usal Antalgic Strategy
NCT00874172
Intravenous Paracetamol or Morphine for the Treatment of Acute Flank Pain
NCT01318187
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
This alternative treatment would avoid the use of morphine, whose potentially damaging consequences on myocardial function have been suggested by experimental studies and by an observational study. The physician of the mobile emergency team (SMUR) verifies the inclusion and non- inclusion criteria for the study. The patient must present STEMI defined in accordance with the recommendations and chest pain of intensity ≥ 4 on the NRS. The specific treatment for STEMI will be given before inclusion in the study, with the exception of analgesic treatment. In particular, inclusion in the study must not delay the initiation of strategies of recanalization and reperfusion.
The SMUR physician in charge of the patient will administer the treatment defined by randomization.
After 30 minutes, the patient will be managed in accordance with the recommendations and will be hospitalized, generally in a cardiology intensive care unit. At one month, the clinical research technician will record the patient's vital status and collect the patient's hospital records.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Morphine
Morphine group: administration of morphine will start with a 0.05 mg/kg bolus followed by reinjection of 2 mg every 5 minutes until effective analgesia is obtained, defined as NRS ≤ 3.
Morphine
Bolus of 2 mg intravenously if EN = 4 or 5 and 3 mg bolus if EN\> 6 followed by reinjection of 2mg every 5 minutes until effective analgesia.
MEOPA and paracetamol
The patient will be equipped with a facemask delivering MEOPA.The gas flow received by the patient is adapted to his/her ventilation.
During the same time, an intravenous injection of 1 g paracetamol will be administered.
MEOPA and paracetamol
The patient will be equipped with a facemask after he/she has been informed. The facemask is adapted to the patient. The patient breathes normally in the mask which is held in place by a member of the SMUR team who has received previous training in use of MEOPA. The gas flow received by the patient is adapted to his/her ventilation.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
MEOPA and paracetamol
The patient will be equipped with a facemask after he/she has been informed. The facemask is adapted to the patient. The patient breathes normally in the mask which is held in place by a member of the SMUR team who has received previous training in use of MEOPA. The gas flow received by the patient is adapted to his/her ventilation.
Morphine
Bolus of 2 mg intravenously if EN = 4 or 5 and 3 mg bolus if EN\> 6 followed by reinjection of 2mg every 5 minutes until effective analgesia.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* Heart failure: Killip class III and IV
* Known allergy to morphine or nitrous oxide
* Patient who has already received morphine or MEOPA before the arrival of the hospital team during the 4 hours preceding the pre-hospital intervention
* Contraindications to nitrous oxide
* Patient unable to assess pain intensity on the numerical rating scale
* Patient under legal guardianship
* Pregnancy
* Patient transported by air ambulance
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University Hospital, Toulouse
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Sandrine Charpentier, PH,MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University Hospital, Toulouse
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Centre Hospitalier d'Agen
Agen, , France
Centre Hospitalier Jean Minjoz
Besançon, , France
CHU Avicenne
Bobigny, , France
Hôpital Pellegrin
Bordeaux, , France
Centre Hospitalier Bourg-en-Bresse
Bourg-en-Bresse, , France
Centre Hospitalier de Chambéry
Chambéry, , France
Centre Hospitalier Louis Pasteur
Chartres, , France
Centre Hospitalier Chateauroux
Châteauroux, , France
CHU d'Estaing
Clermont-Ferrand, , France
Centre Hospitalier Beaujon
Clichy, , France
Centre Hospitalier Alpes Léman
Contamine-sur-Arve, , France
Centre Hospitalier Sud Francilien
Corbeil-Essonnes, , France
Centre Hospitalier Dijon
Dijon, , France
Centre Hospitalier du Val d'Ariège
Foix, , France
Centre Hospitalier Raymond Poincaré
Garches, , France
Centre Hospitalier de Grenoble
Grenoble, , France
Centre Hospitalier Départemental La Roche/Yon
La Roche-sur-Yon, , France
CHRU Lille
Lille, , France
CHU Dupuytren
Limoges, , France
Centre Hospitalier Edouard Herriot
Lyon, , France
Centre Hospitalier de la Timone
Marseille, , France
Centre Hospitalier Marc Jacquet
Melun, , France
CHR Bon Secours
Metz, , France
CHRU Montpellier
Montpellier, , France
CHU Nancy
Nancy, , France
CHU Nantes
Nantes, , France
Centre Hospitalier de Nice
Nice, , France
Centre Hospitalier Necker
Paris, , France
Centre Hospitalier Pitié-Salpétrière
Paris, , France
Groupe hospitamier Lariboisière-Fernand Widal-St-Louis
Paris, , France
CHU Poitiers
Poitiers, , France
Centre Hospitalier René Dubos
Pontoise, , France
Centre Hospitalier Annecy-Gennevois
Pringy, , France
Centre Hospitalier Comminges Pyrénées
Saint-Gaudens, , France
Centre Hospitalier Poulon la Seyne-sur-mer
Toulon, , France
CHU Toulouse
Toulouse, , France
CHRU Tours
Tours, , France
Centre Hospitalier de Valence
Valence, , France
Centre Hospitalier Lucien Hussel
Vienne, , France
CHU Félix Guyon
Saint-Denis, , Reunion
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Danchin N, Puymirat E, Aissaoui N, Adavane S, Durand E. [Epidemiology of acute coronary syndromes in France and in Europe]. Ann Cardiol Angeiol (Paris). 2010 Dec;59 Suppl 2:S37-41. doi: 10.1016/S0003-3928(10)70008-1. French.
Myocardial infarction redefined--a consensus document of The Joint European Society of Cardiology/American College of Cardiology Committee for the redefinition of myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J. 2000 Sep;21(18):1502-13. doi: 10.1053/euhj.2000.2305.
Task Force for Diagnosis and Treatment of Non-ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes of European Society of Cardiology; Bassand JP, Hamm CW, Ardissino D, Boersma E, Budaj A, Fernandez-Aviles F, Fox KA, Hasdai D, Ohman EM, Wallentin L, Wijns W. Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J. 2007 Jul;28(13):1598-660. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehm161. Epub 2007 Jun 14. No abstract available.
Van de Werf F, Bax J, Betriu A, Blomstrom-Lundqvist C, Crea F, Falk V, Filippatos G, Fox K, Huber K, Kastrati A, Rosengren A, Steg PG, Tubaro M, Verheugt F, Weidinger F, Weis M; ESC Committee for Practice Guidelines (CPG). Management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with persistent ST-segment elevation: the Task Force on the Management of ST-Segment Elevation Acute Myocardial Infarction of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J. 2008 Dec;29(23):2909-45. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehn416. Epub 2008 Nov 12. No abstract available.
Canadian Cardiovascular Society; American Academy of Family Physicians; American College of Cardiology; American Heart Association; Antman EM, Hand M, Armstrong PW, Bates ER, Green LA, Halasyamani LK, Hochman JS, Krumholz HM, Lamas GA, Mullany CJ, Pearle DL, Sloan MA, Smith SC Jr, Anbe DT, Kushner FG, Ornato JP, Pearle DL, Sloan MA, Jacobs AK, Adams CD, Anderson JL, Buller CE, Creager MA, Ettinger SM, Halperin JL, Hunt SA, Lytle BW, Nishimura R, Page RL, Riegel B, Tarkington LG, Yancy CW. 2007 focused update of the ACC/AHA 2004 guidelines for the management of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008 Jan 15;51(2):210-47. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.10.001. No abstract available.
Charpentier S, Galinski M, Bounes V, Ricard-Hibon A, El-Khoury C, Elbaz M, Ageron FX, Manzo-Silberman S, Soulat L, Lapostolle F, Gerard A, Bregeaud D, Bongard V, Bonnefoy-Cudraz E; SCADOL II investigators. Nitrous oxide/oxygen plus acetaminophen versus morphine in ST elevation myocardial infarction: open-label, cluster-randomized, non-inferiority study. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2020 May 12;28(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s13049-020-00731-y.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
13705001
Identifier Type: OTHER_GRANT
Identifier Source: secondary_id
RC31/13/7050
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.