Effectiveness of New Analgesic Strategy Compared to the Usal Antalgic Strategy

NCT ID: NCT00874172

Last Updated: 2012-12-18

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

176 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2009-10-31

Study Completion Date

2012-11-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Quality of life of adult patients with sickle cell disease is deeply impaired by severe adverse medical events that inadvertently occur throughout their time life. Indeed, patients not presenting a life threatening condition often present to the emergency department with sickle cell disease crisis related pain. Currently, the effectiveness of specific analgesic strategies for treating sickle cell disease crisis related pain are mostly based on acetaminophen and opioid derivates combination along with oxygen delivery. Those strategies are effective but may last up to half an hour to obtain pain relief. This delay mostly depends on the availability of venous access and on individual patient response to treatment. Nitrous oxide is a volatile efficient analgesic therapy that has been repeatedly shown to allow rapid analgesia in the emergency department setting.

The investigators hypothesise that a new analgesic strategy (rapid optimized analgesic strategy) including nitrous oxide and nefopam would be as safe and more rapidly effective than current analgesic strategy.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Purpose of the study:

The main objective is to evaluate the effectiveness of an optimized combination of analgesic therapies for treating uncomplicated sickle cell disease crisis at initial visit to the emergency room of the Henri Mondor hospital.

Secondary objectives:

* Total amount of morphine required during the first 4 hours in the hospital emergency.
* Overall amount of morphine administered on the duration of patient stay in hospital Henri Mondor.
* Side effects of analgesic strategies
* Adverse medical events
* Length of hospital stay.
* 7-day and 1-month follow-up and collection of following data:

1. Total number of sickle cell disease crises
2. Number of subsequent readmission and/or visit to an ED
3. Quality of life (EuroQol EQ-5D, and SF-36)
4. Patient satisfaction: pain treatment satisfaction scale. Study design: prospective monocentric open-label randomized controlled trial Number of patients: 200 Follow up per patient: 1 month, Study enrolment period: 25 months.

Contraindications to nefopam administration: hypersensitivity to nefopam, benign prostatic hypertrophy and glaucoma, or history of seizures.

* contraindication to morphine administration hypersensitivity to morphine, decompensate respiratory failure, acute head trauma, uncontrolled epilepsy, severe hepatocellular failure, intracranial hypertension, use of buprenorphine or nalbuphine Contraindications to MEOPA administration, intra-cranial hypertension, non cooperative patient (sleepiness; encephalopathy, refusal to participate), pneumothorax, emphysema, pneumoperitoneum, digestive occlusion, pneumomediastinum, air embolism, diving accident , facial trauma, patients who recent administration of an ophthalmic gas (SF6, C3F8, C2F6) \< 3 months).
* contraindication to the use of oxygen: no-absolute contraindication no health insurance, adults under tutelage

Main criterion:

Proportion of patients relieved (pain intensity by simple numerical scale \<4) to 30 minutes of their arrival in the emergency department.

Secondary criteria:

* amount of morphine administrated within the first 4 hours of presentation to the emergency department
* overall amount of morphine administrated during hospital stay
* adverse event related with study treatment
* adverse medical events during hospitalization
* length of stay.
* 7-day and 1-month follow-up to collect the following data:

1. Total number of sickle cell disease crises
2. Number of subsequent readmission and/or visit to an ED
3. Quality of life (EuroQol EQ-5D, and SF-36)
4. Patient satisfaction: pain treatment satisfaction scale.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Sickle Cell Anemia

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Anemia Sickle Cell Analgesic Pain Emergency treatment Quality of life

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

2

Combination of acetaminophen, morphine

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

current analgesic strategy

Intervention Type DRUG

paracetamol 1 g per os nasal oxygen therapy

1 amp of morphine 10 mg / 10 cc of glucose 5 %, by repeated bolus administration

1

Combination of acetaminophen, nitrous oxide, nefopam, morphine

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Rapid optimized analgesic strategy

Intervention Type DRUG

Oral treatment :

1 gr Acetaminophen 20 mg of nefopam delivered on a lump sugar Nitrous oxide inhalation with initial output of 9 L/min subsequently Intravenous morphine bolus of 3 mg Nitrous oxide interruption after 5 minutes of the initial morphine bolus

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Rapid optimized analgesic strategy

Oral treatment :

1 gr Acetaminophen 20 mg of nefopam delivered on a lump sugar Nitrous oxide inhalation with initial output of 9 L/min subsequently Intravenous morphine bolus of 3 mg Nitrous oxide interruption after 5 minutes of the initial morphine bolus

Intervention Type DRUG

current analgesic strategy

paracetamol 1 g per os nasal oxygen therapy

1 amp of morphine 10 mg / 10 cc of glucose 5 %, by repeated bolus administration

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* male adult patient with sickle cell anemia,
* age ≥ 18 years,
* main complaint : sickle cell crisis pain,
* initial numeric pain intensity scale at presentation \> 4,
* admission to the ED during working hours (amendment n°2-15/02/2010:from 8h to 20h), from Monday to Friday

Exclusion Criteria

* female adult patient
* complicated sickle cell crisis or admission requirement to an ICU
* recent hospitalisation (\< 10 days) for the same complaint
* previous inclusion in the study
* contraindication to anyone of the study drugs
* no medical insurance
* incompetent adult
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

MALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Aline SANTIN, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Henri Mondor Hospital, Emergency Department

Créteil, , France

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

P070605-OST07010

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id