Effectiveness of New Analgesic Strategy Compared to the Usal Antalgic Strategy
NCT ID: NCT00874172
Last Updated: 2012-12-18
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
176 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2009-10-31
2012-11-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The investigators hypothesise that a new analgesic strategy (rapid optimized analgesic strategy) including nitrous oxide and nefopam would be as safe and more rapidly effective than current analgesic strategy.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The main objective is to evaluate the effectiveness of an optimized combination of analgesic therapies for treating uncomplicated sickle cell disease crisis at initial visit to the emergency room of the Henri Mondor hospital.
Secondary objectives:
* Total amount of morphine required during the first 4 hours in the hospital emergency.
* Overall amount of morphine administered on the duration of patient stay in hospital Henri Mondor.
* Side effects of analgesic strategies
* Adverse medical events
* Length of hospital stay.
* 7-day and 1-month follow-up and collection of following data:
1. Total number of sickle cell disease crises
2. Number of subsequent readmission and/or visit to an ED
3. Quality of life (EuroQol EQ-5D, and SF-36)
4. Patient satisfaction: pain treatment satisfaction scale. Study design: prospective monocentric open-label randomized controlled trial Number of patients: 200 Follow up per patient: 1 month, Study enrolment period: 25 months.
Contraindications to nefopam administration: hypersensitivity to nefopam, benign prostatic hypertrophy and glaucoma, or history of seizures.
* contraindication to morphine administration hypersensitivity to morphine, decompensate respiratory failure, acute head trauma, uncontrolled epilepsy, severe hepatocellular failure, intracranial hypertension, use of buprenorphine or nalbuphine Contraindications to MEOPA administration, intra-cranial hypertension, non cooperative patient (sleepiness; encephalopathy, refusal to participate), pneumothorax, emphysema, pneumoperitoneum, digestive occlusion, pneumomediastinum, air embolism, diving accident , facial trauma, patients who recent administration of an ophthalmic gas (SF6, C3F8, C2F6) \< 3 months).
* contraindication to the use of oxygen: no-absolute contraindication no health insurance, adults under tutelage
Main criterion:
Proportion of patients relieved (pain intensity by simple numerical scale \<4) to 30 minutes of their arrival in the emergency department.
Secondary criteria:
* amount of morphine administrated within the first 4 hours of presentation to the emergency department
* overall amount of morphine administrated during hospital stay
* adverse event related with study treatment
* adverse medical events during hospitalization
* length of stay.
* 7-day and 1-month follow-up to collect the following data:
1. Total number of sickle cell disease crises
2. Number of subsequent readmission and/or visit to an ED
3. Quality of life (EuroQol EQ-5D, and SF-36)
4. Patient satisfaction: pain treatment satisfaction scale.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
2
Combination of acetaminophen, morphine
current analgesic strategy
paracetamol 1 g per os nasal oxygen therapy
1 amp of morphine 10 mg / 10 cc of glucose 5 %, by repeated bolus administration
1
Combination of acetaminophen, nitrous oxide, nefopam, morphine
Rapid optimized analgesic strategy
Oral treatment :
1 gr Acetaminophen 20 mg of nefopam delivered on a lump sugar Nitrous oxide inhalation with initial output of 9 L/min subsequently Intravenous morphine bolus of 3 mg Nitrous oxide interruption after 5 minutes of the initial morphine bolus
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Rapid optimized analgesic strategy
Oral treatment :
1 gr Acetaminophen 20 mg of nefopam delivered on a lump sugar Nitrous oxide inhalation with initial output of 9 L/min subsequently Intravenous morphine bolus of 3 mg Nitrous oxide interruption after 5 minutes of the initial morphine bolus
current analgesic strategy
paracetamol 1 g per os nasal oxygen therapy
1 amp of morphine 10 mg / 10 cc of glucose 5 %, by repeated bolus administration
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* age ≥ 18 years,
* main complaint : sickle cell crisis pain,
* initial numeric pain intensity scale at presentation \> 4,
* admission to the ED during working hours (amendment n°2-15/02/2010:from 8h to 20h), from Monday to Friday
Exclusion Criteria
* complicated sickle cell crisis or admission requirement to an ICU
* recent hospitalisation (\< 10 days) for the same complaint
* previous inclusion in the study
* contraindication to anyone of the study drugs
* no medical insurance
* incompetent adult
18 Years
MALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Aline SANTIN, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Henri Mondor Hospital, Emergency Department
Créteil, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
P070605-OST07010
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id