A Comparison of Efficacy of Intravenous Esomeprazole and Ranitidine Treatment of Dyspeptic Pain
NCT ID: NCT02197143
Last Updated: 2014-07-22
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
286 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2013-03-31
2014-07-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
* The objective of the study was to assess whether intravenous esomeprazol has superior dyspeptic pain reduction compared with ranitidine or hydrotalcid in emergency department (ED) adults
* The investigators second aim was to compare recurrent dyspeptic pain within 24 hours after discharge and cost of treatments in the treatment of dyspepsia.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparison of Pantoprazole and Ranitidine in Dyspepsia
NCT01737840
Symptomatic Relief of Acute Dyspeptic Pain in Emergency Department With Pantoprazole
NCT01281501
Gastric pH in Critically Ill Patients
NCT00590928
Compare Efficacy of Gastric Acid Suppression by Oral and Intravenous Administration of Esomeprazole in Patients With Peptic Ulcer
NCT00471029
AGN 201904 Versus Esomeprazole in the Prevention of Aspirin-induced Stomach or Upper Intestinal Damage in Healthy Volunteers
NCT00325715
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
* A randomized clinical trial was conducted in the ED of Pamukkale University Medical Faculty Hospital
* Study personnel (emergency physicians and nurses) were trained before the study.
* When intravenous drugs (esomeprazol, ranitidine or plasebo) was being recommended, an eligibility checklist was completed by the attending physician.
* If there were no exclusion criteria, written informed consent was obtained and baseline information, including initial dispeptic pain severity ratings with VAS were recorded.
* The need for identification and enrollment of participants by staff with conflicting work pressures resulted in recruitment of a convenience sample of patients.
* All patients eligible for the study were randomized to one of three groups:
* First Group: 40 mg Esomeprozol with 5 cc syringe in 150 ml normal saline given as a slow intravenous infusion over 15 minutes and p.o. 10ml Hidrotalcid
* Second Group: 50mg Ranitidin with 5 cc syringe in 150 ml normal saline given as a slow intravenous infusion over 15 minutes and p.o. 10ml Hidrotalcid
* Third Group: 150 ml only normal saline given as a slow intravenous infusion over 15 minutes and p.o. 10ml Hidrotalcid
* Drug packs prepared in 5 ml syringes were numbered by an independent nurse, who not involved in the study.
* Drug packs were prepared according to the computer-generated random number sequence to assign treatment allocations
* The allocation list was kept by the emergency nurse. Patients received the esomeprazol, the ranitidin or the placebo medication schemes according to their random allocations.
* After enrollment and recording of baseline information, the next numbered study drug pack was obtained, and administered as a infusion over 15 minutes.
* Randomization was achieved by using computer software to generate random numbers. During the intervention, participants were monitored by an oxygen saturation (SpO2) monitor, an automatic sphygmomanometer (blood pressure), and a rhythm monitor (heart rate and rhythms)
* One researcher blinded to patient allocation observed the whole procedure and recorded the dyspeptic pain scores.
* Patients in both groups received three types of medication in a similar manner (for example, 150 ml normal saline given as a slow intravenous infusion over 15 minutes), thus ensuring double blinding.
* Dyspeptic pain scores were recorded at 0, 15, 30, 45 and 60 min on a VAS of 1 to 10
* Rescue medication \[hidrotalcid 10ml (Talcid, Bayer, Istanbul, Turkey)\] was given intravenously to patients if dyspeptic pain VAS scores ≥ 5 in thirty minutes after study drug administration.
* All other medications required during the study also were recorded.
* During the study, pulse rate, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, respiration rate and oxygen saturation (SpO2) were recorded at baseline (0 min), 15, 30, and 60 min.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
FACTORIAL
TREATMENT
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Esomeprazole
40 mg Esomeprazole in 150 ml normal saline given as a slow intravenous infusion over 15 minutes and p.o. 10ml Hydrotalcid
esomeprazole
40 mg esomeprazole in 150 ml normal saline given as a slow intravenous infusion over 15 minutes and p.o. 10ml Hydrotalcid
hydrotalcid
150 ml only normal saline given as a slow intravenous infusion over 15 minutes and p.o. 10ml Hydrotalcid
Ranitidine
50mg Ranitidine in 150 ml normal saline given as a slow intravenous infusion over 15 minutes and p.o. 10ml Hydrotalcid
esomeprazole
40 mg esomeprazole in 150 ml normal saline given as a slow intravenous infusion over 15 minutes and p.o. 10ml Hydrotalcid
Ranitidine
50mg Ranitidine in 150 ml normal saline given as a slow intravenous infusion over 15 minutes and p.o. 10ml Hydrotalcid
placebo
150 ml only normal saline given as a slow intravenous infusion over 15 minutes and p.o. 10ml Hydrotalcid
Ranitidine
50mg Ranitidine in 150 ml normal saline given as a slow intravenous infusion over 15 minutes and p.o. 10ml Hydrotalcid
hydrotalcid
150 ml only normal saline given as a slow intravenous infusion over 15 minutes and p.o. 10ml Hydrotalcid
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
esomeprazole
40 mg esomeprazole in 150 ml normal saline given as a slow intravenous infusion over 15 minutes and p.o. 10ml Hydrotalcid
Ranitidine
50mg Ranitidine in 150 ml normal saline given as a slow intravenous infusion over 15 minutes and p.o. 10ml Hydrotalcid
hydrotalcid
150 ml only normal saline given as a slow intravenous infusion over 15 minutes and p.o. 10ml Hydrotalcid
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* had dyspspsia \[VAS (visual analog scale) score \>5\] during their ED episode of care for which the attending physician recommended medication.
Exclusion Criteria
* known cases of malignancy or terminal illness;
* known cases of major medical problems (eg, any evidence of active structural or functional abnormality of the hearts, chronic renal failure)
* allergy or previous adverse reaction to study drugs studied
* received agents to inhibit the secretion of acid (PPIs or histamine-2 receptor antagonists), nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs,
* who consumed alcohol within 4 hours before the ED visit
* diarrhea more than 2 times within the past 24 hours;
* being suspected to have other ED diagnoses (eg, gut obstruction, biliary colic, pancreatitis, hepatitis, or localized hepatobiliary infections);
* being pregnant or breast-feeding; and
* inability to comprehend the VAS evaluation.
* and patients who refused to participate study.
18 Years
60 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Pamukkale University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
hayri elicabuk
md
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
hayri elicabuk, md
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
pamukkale universty
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Pamukkale Universty
Denizli, Denizli, Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
120841
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
MDhayri84
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.