A Randomized Trial Comparing the Lokomat® With a Gait-related Physiotherapy Program in Children With Cerebral Palsy

NCT ID: NCT02196298

Last Updated: 2017-01-31

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

32 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2012-10-31

Study Completion Date

2017-01-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The Lokomat is a robotic treadmill gait trainer that is used to help people who have neurologic conditions walk better. Early research with children with cerebral palsy (CP) shows that it may help to improve walking skills. The purpose of this two-group randomized study is to compare Lokomat training to regular physiotherapy (PT) as far as impact on walking abilities and related function. The primary (alternate) hypothesis is that children will improve more with Lokomat training in terms of gross motor skills and walking endurance.

The investigators are enrolling 40 ambulatory children who are ages 5 to 12 years, have CP and are in Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) Level II (n=20) or III (n=20). In this crossover randomized clinical trial (RCT), whether PT or Lokomat intervention is done first is decided by an independent randomization process that occurs after the first baseline assessment. In the Lokomat phase, children receive 8 to 10 weeks of twice weekly therapy for a maximum of 16 sessions. Each session is 35 minutes plus the time needed for set-up. The 35 minute PT program is also given twice weekly for 8 to 10 weeks for a maximum of 16 sessions, and focuses on a menu-based strength, co-ordination, fitness, walking and balance activities. There is a 6 week break between the Lokomat and PT interventions.

Each child has four study assessments during their \~6 months in the study. The first assessment is done before starting the Lokomat or physiotherapy phase. The second happens after the first intervention has finished. The child then has a 6-week break period. The third assessment is done at the end of this break, and the fourth occurs after the second intervention. The PT assessor who does these assessments will not be the same as the PT who gives the intervention. The assessor is blinded to the child's intervention phase and previous assessment results. The primary outcome measures are the Gross Motor Function Measure and 6 minute walk test. Secondary measures evaluate gait, functional abilities, participation, health related quality of life and individualized goals.

The randomized aspect of the study lets us look at outcome differences between children for Lokomat and PT within their first intervention phase (n=20/group). The cross-over phase evaluates within-child outcomes across the two phases. A qualitative component is concurrently underway to examine child/parent experiences and their views of Lokomat outcomes.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

No further information

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Cerebral Palsy

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Lokomat

16 sessions in total, 30 minutes each plus set-up time followed by 5 minutes of overground walking. Provided by study PT twice weekly for a period of 8 weeks to maximum of 10 weeks.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Lokomat

Intervention Type DEVICE

16 sessions in total, 30 minutes each plus set-up time followed by 5 minutes of overground walking. Provided by study PT twice weekly for a period of 8 weeks to maximum of 10 weeks.

Physiotherapy

16 sessions, 35 minutes. Provided by study PT twice weekly for a period of 8 weeks to maximum of 10 weeks.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Physiotherapy

Intervention Type OTHER

16 sessions, 35 minutes. Provided by study PT twice weekly for a period of 8 weeks to maximum of 10 weeks.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Lokomat

16 sessions in total, 30 minutes each plus set-up time followed by 5 minutes of overground walking. Provided by study PT twice weekly for a period of 8 weeks to maximum of 10 weeks.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Physiotherapy

16 sessions, 35 minutes. Provided by study PT twice weekly for a period of 8 weeks to maximum of 10 weeks.

Intervention Type OTHER

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Lokomat®Pro Pediatric Orthoses

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* age 5 to12 years inclusive
* assessed as GMFCS Levels II or III
* able to follow testing instructions, and participate in a minimum of 30 minutes of active PT
* able to reliably signal pain, fear and discomfort
* have passive range of motion (ROM) of hips and knees within minimum range requirement for Lokomat (hip and knee flexion contracture \< 10 degrees, and knee valgus \< 40 degrees)
* client of Child Development Program at Holland Bloorview
* able to commit to attendance of twice weekly for eight weeks (to support the primary efficacy analysis).

Exclusion Criteria

* a fixed knee contracture \> 10 degrees, knee valgus \>40 degrees such that robotic leg orthosis will not be adaptable to lower limbs
* hip instability/subluxation \> 45%
* orthopaedic surgery within the last 9 months (muscle) or 12 months (bone)
* Botulinum toxin-A (BTX-A) injections to lower limb in the last 4 months
* inability to discontinue BTX-A for period of 6 months (during trial) due to concerns about ROM or pain
* severe spasticity may be a contraindication
* any weightbearing restrictions
* seizure disorder that is not controlled by medication (if on medication, must not have had a seizure in the last 12 months)
* open skin lesions or vascular disorder of lower extremities
* not able to co-operate or be positioned adequately within the Lokomat as shown during the two Lokomat fitting/acclimatisation sessions
* not prepared or unable to discontinue a regular therapy intervention during the course of the trial
* involved in another intervention study
Minimum Eligible Age

5 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

12 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

CIBC Children's Foundation

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Virginia Wright

Senior Scientist

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Virginia Wright, PT, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabiltation Hospital

Darcy Fehlings, MD, MSc

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabiltation Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabiltation Hospital

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Canada

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Hilderley AJ, Fehlings D, Lee GW, Wright FV. Comparison of a robotic-assisted gait training program with a program of functional gait training for children with cerebral palsy: design and methods of a two group randomized controlled cross-over trial. Springerplus. 2016 Oct 28;5(1):1886. doi: 10.1186/s40064-016-3535-0. eCollection 2016.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27843743 (View on PubMed)

Phelan SK, Gibson BE, Wright FV. What is it like to walk with the help of a robot? Children's perspectives on robotic gait training technology. Disabil Rehabil. 2015;37(24):2272-81. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2015.1019648. Epub 2015 Apr 9.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25856202 (View on PubMed)

Beveridge B, Feltracco D, Struyf J, Strauss E, Dang S, Phelan S, Wright FV, Gibson BE. "You gotta try it all": Parents' Experiences with Robotic Gait Training for their Children with Cerebral Palsy. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2015;35(4):327-41. doi: 10.3109/01942638.2014.990547. Epub 2014 Dec 20.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25529412 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

http://www.hollandbloorview.ca

Website of facility where trial is occurring. Investigators' lab sites are also on that website

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

12-293

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.