The Measurement-based Care in Patients With Depressive Disorder: A Randomized Controlled Trial

NCT ID: NCT02191124

Last Updated: 2014-07-16

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

164 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2011-06-30

Study Completion Date

2013-05-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

In recent years, measurement-based care (MBC) has been gaining more attention in the treatment of depression because it allows psychiatrists to individualize treatment decisions for each patient based on the change of psychopathology and tolerance toward antidepressants. Several studies, such as the Sequenced Treatment Alternatives to Relieve Depression (STAR\*D) trial using MBC, found that MBC-informed sequential algorithms can be successfully integrated into clinical practice and improve patients' outcomes However, despite a strong theoretical rationale for MBC and data supporting the ability to implement MBC in clinical practice settings, there is currently no randomized controlled trial in MDD patients comparing MBC with usual/standard care. The investigators compare MBC with clinician's treatment decisions, standardizing care to two commonly prescribed antidepressants.

Therefore, the aim of this study is to determine the effects of MBC in patients with MDD compared to standard treatment (ST). The research hypothesis is that compared to ST, the estimated time to response and to remission would be significantly shorter in the MBC group without increased dropout rates and side effect burden.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Objective: To compare the effectiveness and feasibility of the measurement-based care (MBC) in the treatment of depression with clinician's treatment decisions, standardizing treatment (ST, clinicians' choice decisions) to two commonly prescribed antidepressants.

Methods: Selecting the patients in psychiatric hospitals and general hospitals with depression, with multi-center randomized controlled study design. Refer to STAR-D "measurement-based care" mode, to establish the whole measurement-based evaluation system. Eligible patients will be randomly assigned to 24 weeks of MBC or ST, restricting treatment to paroxetine (20-60mg/day) or mirtazapine (15-45mg/day) in both groups. the ST group will maximize simulate of the actual clinical situation, and the patients of the MBC group are required to complete the prospective Life-chart Methodology (LCM-p), 16-item Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology Self-Report (QIDS-SR16) and other related symptoms and side effects of self-assessment, the doctor will make a comprehensive assessment according to the results of self-assessment, adjust treatment according to research programs. This is 1-year follow-up study; the independent members will have a blinded assessment in the baseline visit and each point of view. Depressive symptoms are measured using the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAMD) and QIDS-SR.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Major Depressive Disorder

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

FACTORIAL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

measurement-based care

MBC allows psychiatrists to individualize treatment decisions for each patient based on the change of psychopathology and tolerance toward antidepressants. Treatment decisions were made by treating psychiatrists according to ratings of self-report scales obtained at each treatment visit. Paroxetine was started at 20mg/day and then raised to 30mg/day by week 4, 40mg/day by week 6, 50mg/day by week 8 and 60mg/day by week 10. Mirtazapine was started at 15mg/day and raised to 30mg/day by week 1 and 45mg/day by week 4. Dose adjustments were dependent on how long a patient had received a particular dose, symptom changes and side effects.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Paroxetine

Intervention Type DRUG

Patients in both groups (MBC or ST) receive open-label paroxetine (20-60mg/day) within the therapeutic dose range recommended by the Guidelines for the Prevention and Treatment of Major Depression in China.

Mirtazapine

Intervention Type DRUG

Patients in both groups (MBC or ST) receive open-label mirtazapine (15-45mg/day) within the therapeutic dose range recommended by the Guidelines for the Prevention and Treatment of Major Depression in China

Standard treatment

Patients in the ST group are treated by their psychiatrists according to their clinical needs as judged at each outpatient visit, receiving either open-label paroxetine (20-60mg/day) or mirtazapine (15-45mg/day) within the therapeutic dose range.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Paroxetine

Intervention Type DRUG

Patients in both groups (MBC or ST) receive open-label paroxetine (20-60mg/day) within the therapeutic dose range recommended by the Guidelines for the Prevention and Treatment of Major Depression in China.

Mirtazapine

Intervention Type DRUG

Patients in both groups (MBC or ST) receive open-label mirtazapine (15-45mg/day) within the therapeutic dose range recommended by the Guidelines for the Prevention and Treatment of Major Depression in China

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Paroxetine

Patients in both groups (MBC or ST) receive open-label paroxetine (20-60mg/day) within the therapeutic dose range recommended by the Guidelines for the Prevention and Treatment of Major Depression in China.

Intervention Type DRUG

Mirtazapine

Patients in both groups (MBC or ST) receive open-label mirtazapine (15-45mg/day) within the therapeutic dose range recommended by the Guidelines for the Prevention and Treatment of Major Depression in China

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Seroxat Remeron

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. age 18-65 years;
2. outpatients;
3. diagnosis of non-psychotic MDD established by treating psychiatrists and confirmed by a checklist based on DSM-IV criteria at study entry ;
4. total score of HAMD-17≥17;
5. ability to communicate and provide written consent.

Exclusion Criteria

1. current or past history of drug and alcohol dependence, bipolar, psychotic, obsessive-compulsive, or eating disorders;
2. history of lack of response or intolerance to any of the two protocol antidepressants (paroxetine or mirtazapine);
3. being pregnant or breast-feeding;
4. suicide attempts in the current depressive episode or major medical conditions contraindicating the use of the protocol antidepressants.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Capital Medical University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Gang Wang

vice-director of Affective Disorder Center, Beijing Anding Hospital

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Gang Wang, MD;PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Beijing Anding Hospital, Capital Medical University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Beijing Anding Hospital

Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2009-1051

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Precision Care for Major Depressive Disorder
NCT06580041 ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION PHASE4