A Study to Compare the Safety and Efficacy of Romosozumab (AMG 785) Versus Placebo in Men With Osteoporosis

NCT ID: NCT02186171

Last Updated: 2019-05-28

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

245 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-06-16

Study Completion Date

2016-04-20

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The study is designed to evaluate if treatment with romosozumab once a month for 12 months compared with placebo is effective in increasing bone mineral density (BMD) at the lumbar spine. Additionally, the study will assess the effect of treatment with romosozumab for 12 months compared with placebo on BMD at the femoral neck and total hip.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Osteoporosis in Men

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Romosozumab

Participants received 210 mg romosozumab administered by subcutaneous injection once a month for 12 months.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Romosozumab

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Administered by subcutaneous injection once a month.

Placebo

Participants received placebo subcutaneous injections once a month for 12 months.

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

Administered by subcutaneous injection once a month.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Romosozumab

Administered by subcutaneous injection once a month.

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Placebo

Administered by subcutaneous injection once a month.

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

AMG 785 EVENITY™

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Must be ambulatory male subjects ≥ 55 years to ≤ 90 years of age
* Must have a BMD T score ≤ -2.50 at the spine or hip, or BMD T score ≤ -1.50 at the spine or hip and a history of fragility nonvertebral fracture or vertebral fracture.

Exclusion Criteria

* A BMD T score ≤ -3.50 at the hip,
* History of hip fracture
* Severe metabolic bone diseases
* Significant laboratory abnormalities
* Recent treatment with agents affecting bone metabolism
Minimum Eligible Age

55 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

90 Years

Eligible Sex

MALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Amgen

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

MD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Amgen

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Research Site

Lakewood, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Bethesda, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Genk, , Belgium

Site Status

Research Site

Ghent, , Belgium

Site Status

Research Site

Leuven, , Belgium

Site Status

Research Site

Liège, , Belgium

Site Status

Research Site

Medellín, Antioquia, Colombia

Site Status

Research Site

Bogota, Cundinamarca, Colombia

Site Status

Research Site

Ostrava-Trebovice, , Czechia

Site Status

Research Site

Pilsen, , Czechia

Site Status

Research Site

Praha 11 - Chodov, , Czechia

Site Status

Research Site

Aalborg, , Denmark

Site Status

Research Site

Ballerup Municipality, , Denmark

Site Status

Research Site

Mizunami-shi, Gifu, Japan

Site Status

Research Site

Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan

Site Status

Research Site

Bungoono-shi, Oita Prefecture, Japan

Site Status

Research Site

Takatsuki-shi, Osaka, Japan

Site Status

Research Site

Hachioji-shi, Tokyo, Japan

Site Status

Research Site

Shinagawa-ku, Tokyo, Japan

Site Status

Research Site

Toshima-ku, Tokyo, Japan

Site Status

Research Site

Mexicali, Baja California Norte, Mexico

Site Status

Research Site

Monterrey, Nuevo León, Mexico

Site Status

Research Site

Culiacán, Sinaloa, Mexico

Site Status

Research Site

Lodz, , Poland

Site Status

Research Site

Świdnik, , Poland

Site Status

Research Site

Warsaw, , Poland

Site Status

Research Site

Wroclaw, , Poland

Site Status

Research Site

Moscow, , Russia

Site Status

Research Site

Saint Petersburg, , Russia

Site Status

Research Site

Yaroslavl, , Russia

Site Status

Research Site

Bern, , Switzerland

Site Status

Research Site

Zurich, , Switzerland

Site Status

Research Site

Zurich, , Switzerland

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Belgium Colombia Czechia Denmark Japan Mexico Poland Russia Switzerland

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Lewiecki EM, Blicharski T, Goemaere S, Lippuner K, Meisner PD, Miller PD, Miyauchi A, Maddox J, Chen L, Horlait S. A Phase III Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of Romosozumab in Men With Osteoporosis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2018 Sep 1;103(9):3183-3193. doi: 10.1210/jc.2017-02163.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29931216 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

http://www.amgentrials.com

AmgenTrials clinical trials website

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2013-005551-32

Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

20110174

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Romosozumab Use to Build Skeletal Integrity
NCT05058976 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING PHASE4
The Optimised Use of Romozosumab Study
NCT06059222 RECRUITING PHASE4