Trial Outcomes & Findings for A Clinical Trial to Study the Impact of a Nutritional Beverage on Tests of Memory in Healthy Preschool Age Children (NCT NCT02177942)
NCT ID: NCT02177942
Last Updated: 2019-04-01
Results Overview
Short term memory was measured using word order and number recall sub tests of Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children (KABC).In Number Recall, child was asked to repeat series of number in same sequence after making sure that child is paying attention.A score of 0 and 1 given for incorrect and correct response respectively. In Word Order,qualified site staff said series of words and child then pointed pictures of those words in same sequence.Later items (object cards with pictures) included an interference task in which child named colors after hearing the word. Each subtest score was the total of item scores, ranging from 0-31 for word order and 0-22 for number recall. The two subtest scores were standardized for each subject and visit (Z score), and short term memory was calculated as the average of the two standardized values where higher scores reflect better short term memory.
COMPLETED
NA
528 participants
Baseline and 6 months
2019-04-01
Participant Flow
Participants were recruited at one center in India.
A total of 656 participants were screened out of which 528 were randomized to study treatments. 363 participants completed the study. Of the 165 randomized participants not completing the study, 152 withdrew consent, 10 participants violated the protocol, 2 participants were lost to follow up and 1 withdrew due to adverse event.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Test
30 grams of cereal beverage powder with protein and added micronutrients was made up to 100 mililiters (mL) drink using luke warm water. Participants were administered two doses of the drink (100 mL each) everyday.
|
Control
30 grams of cereal beverage powder with low protein and no added micronutrients was made up to 100 mL using luke warm water. Participants were administered two doses of the drink (100 mL each) everyday.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
262
|
266
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
185
|
178
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
77
|
88
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Test
30 grams of cereal beverage powder with protein and added micronutrients was made up to 100 mililiters (mL) drink using luke warm water. Participants were administered two doses of the drink (100 mL each) everyday.
|
Control
30 grams of cereal beverage powder with low protein and no added micronutrients was made up to 100 mL using luke warm water. Participants were administered two doses of the drink (100 mL each) everyday.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Adverse Event
|
1
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
1
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Protocol Violation
|
4
|
6
|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
71
|
81
|
Baseline Characteristics
A Clinical Trial to Study the Impact of a Nutritional Beverage on Tests of Memory in Healthy Preschool Age Children
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Test
n=185 Participants
30 grams of cereal beverage powder with protein and added micronutrients was made up to 100 mL drink using luke warm water. Participants were administered two doses of the drink (100 mL each) everyday.
|
Control
n=178 Participants
30 grams of cereal beverage powder with low protein and no added micronutrients was made up to 100 mL using luke warm water. Participants were administered two doses of the drink (100 mL each) everyday.
|
Total
n=363 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
4.21 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.607 • n=5 Participants
|
4.24 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.646 • n=7 Participants
|
4.22 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.626 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
83 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
66 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
149 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
102 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
112 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
214 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and 6 monthsPopulation: ITT population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one study treatment during the study and provided at least one post-baseline assessment of efficacy which was same as end of study (at 6 months). This analysis was conducted on ITT population.
Short term memory was measured using word order and number recall sub tests of Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children (KABC).In Number Recall, child was asked to repeat series of number in same sequence after making sure that child is paying attention.A score of 0 and 1 given for incorrect and correct response respectively. In Word Order,qualified site staff said series of words and child then pointed pictures of those words in same sequence.Later items (object cards with pictures) included an interference task in which child named colors after hearing the word. Each subtest score was the total of item scores, ranging from 0-31 for word order and 0-22 for number recall. The two subtest scores were standardized for each subject and visit (Z score), and short term memory was calculated as the average of the two standardized values where higher scores reflect better short term memory.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Test
n=185 Participants
30 grams of cereal beverage powder with protein and added micronutrients was made up to 100 mL drink using luke warm water. Participants were administered two doses of the drink (100 mL each) everyday.
|
Control
n=178 Participants
30 grams of cereal beverage powder with low protein and no added micronutrients was made up to 100 mL drink using luke warm water. Participants were administered two doses of the drink (100 mL each) everyday.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Short Term Memory at 6 Months
|
-0.04 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.926
|
-0.01 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.856
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and 6 monthsPopulation: ITT population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one study treatment during the study and provided at least one post-baseline assessment of efficacy which was same as end of study (at 6 months). This analysis was conducted on ITT population.
Weight was measured (single measurement) in standard clothing on weighing scale to the nearest 0.1kilograms(kg).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Test
n=185 Participants
30 grams of cereal beverage powder with protein and added micronutrients was made up to 100 mL drink using luke warm water. Participants were administered two doses of the drink (100 mL each) everyday.
|
Control
n=178 Participants
30 grams of cereal beverage powder with low protein and no added micronutrients was made up to 100 mL drink using luke warm water. Participants were administered two doses of the drink (100 mL each) everyday.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Weight at 6 Months
|
0.15 kg
Standard Deviation 0.436
|
0.14 kg
Standard Deviation 0.454
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and 6 monthsPopulation: ITT population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one study treatment during the study and provided at least one post-baseline assessment of efficacy which was same as end of study (at 6 months). This analysis was conducted on ITT population.
Height was measured (single measurement) using a portable stadio-meter, with the participant standing bare-foot, to the nearest 0.1centimeters (cm).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Test
n=185 Participants
30 grams of cereal beverage powder with protein and added micronutrients was made up to 100 mL drink using luke warm water. Participants were administered two doses of the drink (100 mL each) everyday.
|
Control
n=178 Participants
30 grams of cereal beverage powder with low protein and no added micronutrients was made up to 100 mL drink using luke warm water. Participants were administered two doses of the drink (100 mL each) everyday.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Height at 6 Months
|
0.23 cm
Standard Deviation 0.442
|
0.20 cm
Standard Deviation 0.368
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and 6 monthsPopulation: ITT population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one study treatment during the study and provided at least one post-baseline assessment of efficacy which was same as end of study (at 6 months). This analysis was conducted on ITT population.
BMI for was obtained using the World Health Organization Anthroplus software version 1.0.2.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Test
n=185 Participants
30 grams of cereal beverage powder with protein and added micronutrients was made up to 100 mL drink using luke warm water. Participants were administered two doses of the drink (100 mL each) everyday.
|
Control
n=178 Participants
30 grams of cereal beverage powder with low protein and no added micronutrients was made up to 100 mL drink using luke warm water. Participants were administered two doses of the drink (100 mL each) everyday.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Body Mass Index (BMI) at 6 Months
|
0.00 kg/m^2
Standard Deviation 0.584
|
0.02 kg/m^2
Standard Deviation 0.634
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and 6 monthsPopulation: ITT population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one study treatment during the study and provided at least one post-baseline assessment of efficacy which was same as end of study (at 6 months). This analysis was conducted on ITT population.
The TSF was measured in the midline of the posterior aspect of the arm, over the triceps muscle, at a level midway between the lateral projection of the acromion process of the scapula and the inferior margin of the olecranon process of the ulna. The right elbow is flexed at 90°and the midpoint between the acromion and the olecranon process is located and marked at the lateral side of the arm. The skinfold was then measured with the arm hanging loosely while standing. The triceps skinfold was picked up with the left thumb and index finger approximately 1cm proximal to the marked level and the tips calipers were applied to the skin-fold at the marked level. The triceps measurement was done (three measurements) using Holtain calipers to the nearest 0.2 millimeters (mm) and the average value was recorded.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Test
n=185 Participants
30 grams of cereal beverage powder with protein and added micronutrients was made up to 100 mL drink using luke warm water. Participants were administered two doses of the drink (100 mL each) everyday.
|
Control
n=178 Participants
30 grams of cereal beverage powder with low protein and no added micronutrients was made up to 100 mL drink using luke warm water. Participants were administered two doses of the drink (100 mL each) everyday.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Triceps Skin Fold (TSF) at 6 Months
|
-0.33 mm
Standard Deviation 1.810
|
-0.33 mm
Standard Deviation 2.062
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and 6 monthsPopulation: ITT population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one study treatment during the study and provided at least one post-baseline assessment of efficacy which was same as end of study (at 6 months). This analysis was conducted on ITT population.
The MUAC (single measurement) was measured midway between the acromion and the olecranon process, while the participant stands with the elbow flexed at 90. The circumference was measured with a fiber glass tape to the nearest 0.1 cm on the right hand.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Test
n=185 Participants
30 grams of cereal beverage powder with protein and added micronutrients was made up to 100 mL drink using luke warm water. Participants were administered two doses of the drink (100 mL each) everyday.
|
Control
n=178 Participants
30 grams of cereal beverage powder with low protein and no added micronutrients was made up to 100 mL drink using luke warm water. Participants were administered two doses of the drink (100 mL each) everyday.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Mid Upper Arm Circumference (MUAC) at 6 Months
|
0.55 cm
Standard Deviation 1.131
|
0.57 cm
Standard Deviation 1.016
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and 6 monthsPopulation: ITT population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one study treatment during the study and provided at least one post-baseline assessment of efficacy which was same as end of study (at 6 months). This analysis was conducted on ITT population.
Using the MUAC measurement and TSF measurement, the arm muscle AMA and AFA were calculated i.e. AMA (cm2) = (MUAC-(π\*TSF))2/4 π and AFA (cm2) = (MUAC2/4π) - AMA
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Test
n=185 Participants
30 grams of cereal beverage powder with protein and added micronutrients was made up to 100 mL drink using luke warm water. Participants were administered two doses of the drink (100 mL each) everyday.
|
Control
n=178 Participants
30 grams of cereal beverage powder with low protein and no added micronutrients was made up to 100 mL drink using luke warm water. Participants were administered two doses of the drink (100 mL each) everyday.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Arm Muscle Area (AMA) and Arm Fat Area (AFA) at 6 Months
Change from Baseline at 6 months (AMA)
|
1.34 Centimeter square Cm^2
Standard Deviation 2.770
|
1.39 Centimeter square Cm^2
Standard Deviation 2.509
|
|
Change From Baseline in Arm Muscle Area (AMA) and Arm Fat Area (AFA) at 6 Months
Change from Baseline at 6 months (AFA)
|
-0.01 Centimeter square Cm^2
Standard Deviation 1.146
|
0.00 Centimeter square Cm^2
Standard Deviation 1.330
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline upto 6 monthsPopulation: ITT population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one study treatment during the study and provided at least one post-baseline assessment of efficacy which was same as end of study (at 6 months). This analysis was conducted on ITT population.
Number of ill days due to cold, cough and/or associated fever were recorded. The mean number of ill days due was analyzed at 6 months using Analysis of Variance (ANOVA).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Test
n=185 Participants
30 grams of cereal beverage powder with protein and added micronutrients was made up to 100 mL drink using luke warm water. Participants were administered two doses of the drink (100 mL each) everyday.
|
Control
n=178 Participants
30 grams of cereal beverage powder with low protein and no added micronutrients was made up to 100 mL drink using luke warm water. Participants were administered two doses of the drink (100 mL each) everyday.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Ill Days at 6 Months
|
5.94 Number of days
Standard Deviation 3.130
|
7.45 Number of days
Standard Deviation 8.976
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and 6 monthsPopulation: ITT population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one study treatment during the study and provided at least one post-baseline assessment of efficacy which was same as end of study (at 6 months). This analysis was conducted on ITT population.
Test measured visual construction ability, understanding of spatial relationships and problem solving abilities. The child arranged flat shapes of various sizes and colors (items) to match a model or picture as instructed by the qualified staff. For items 1 to 2 (score 2 for success on first trial and 1 on second trial); items 3 to 10 (Score 1 for success and 0 for failure on first trial). The test continued till 3 consecutive scores of 0. The Raw score was the total of item score. Score range 0-29. Higher scores reflect better short term memory
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Test
n=185 Participants
30 grams of cereal beverage powder with protein and added micronutrients was made up to 100 mL drink using luke warm water. Participants were administered two doses of the drink (100 mL each) everyday.
|
Control
n=178 Participants
30 grams of cereal beverage powder with low protein and no added micronutrients was made up to 100 mL drink using luke warm water. Participants were administered two doses of the drink (100 mL each) everyday.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Problem Solving at 6 Months
|
2.86 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.924
|
3.03 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.813
|
Adverse Events
Test
Control
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Test
n=259 participants at risk
30 grams of cereal beverage powder with protein and added micronutrients was made up to 100 mL drink using luke warm water. Participants were administered two doses of the drink (100 mL each) everyday.
|
Control
n=265 participants at risk
30 grams of cereal beverage powder with low protein and no added micronutrients was made up to 100 mL using luke warm water. Participants were administered two doses of the drink (100 mL each) everyday.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Nervous system disorders
CONVULSION
|
0.00%
0/259
Safety population, defined as all participants who were randomized and administered at least one study treatment during the study. The population of analysis was safety population (N=524).
|
0.38%
1/265 • Number of events 1
Safety population, defined as all participants who were randomized and administered at least one study treatment during the study. The population of analysis was safety population (N=524).
|
|
Nervous system disorders
STATUS EPILAPTICUS
|
0.00%
0/259
Safety population, defined as all participants who were randomized and administered at least one study treatment during the study. The population of analysis was safety population (N=524).
|
0.38%
1/265 • Number of events 1
Safety population, defined as all participants who were randomized and administered at least one study treatment during the study. The population of analysis was safety population (N=524).
|
|
Infections and infestations
ACUTE GASTRO ENTERITIS
|
0.00%
0/259
Safety population, defined as all participants who were randomized and administered at least one study treatment during the study. The population of analysis was safety population (N=524).
|
0.38%
1/265 • Number of events 1
Safety population, defined as all participants who were randomized and administered at least one study treatment during the study. The population of analysis was safety population (N=524).
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Test
n=259 participants at risk
30 grams of cereal beverage powder with protein and added micronutrients was made up to 100 mL drink using luke warm water. Participants were administered two doses of the drink (100 mL each) everyday.
|
Control
n=265 participants at risk
30 grams of cereal beverage powder with low protein and no added micronutrients was made up to 100 mL using luke warm water. Participants were administered two doses of the drink (100 mL each) everyday.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Infections and infestations
NASOPHARYNGITIS
|
3.5%
9/259 • Number of events 9
Safety population, defined as all participants who were randomized and administered at least one study treatment during the study. The population of analysis was safety population (N=524).
|
3.8%
10/265 • Number of events 10
Safety population, defined as all participants who were randomized and administered at least one study treatment during the study. The population of analysis was safety population (N=524).
|
|
Infections and infestations
UPPER RESPIRATORY TRACT INFECTION
|
2.7%
7/259 • Number of events 7
Safety population, defined as all participants who were randomized and administered at least one study treatment during the study. The population of analysis was safety population (N=524).
|
3.8%
10/265 • Number of events 10
Safety population, defined as all participants who were randomized and administered at least one study treatment during the study. The population of analysis was safety population (N=524).
|
|
Infections and infestations
PYODERMA
|
0.39%
1/259 • Number of events 1
Safety population, defined as all participants who were randomized and administered at least one study treatment during the study. The population of analysis was safety population (N=524).
|
0.00%
0/265
Safety population, defined as all participants who were randomized and administered at least one study treatment during the study. The population of analysis was safety population (N=524).
|
|
Infections and infestations
VARICELLA
|
0.39%
1/259 • Number of events 1
Safety population, defined as all participants who were randomized and administered at least one study treatment during the study. The population of analysis was safety population (N=524).
|
0.38%
1/265 • Number of events 1
Safety population, defined as all participants who were randomized and administered at least one study treatment during the study. The population of analysis was safety population (N=524).
|
|
Infections and infestations
GASTROENTERITIS
|
0.00%
0/259
Safety population, defined as all participants who were randomized and administered at least one study treatment during the study. The population of analysis was safety population (N=524).
|
1.1%
3/265 • Number of events 3
Safety population, defined as all participants who were randomized and administered at least one study treatment during the study. The population of analysis was safety population (N=524).
|
|
Infections and infestations
IMPETIGO
|
0.00%
0/259
Safety population, defined as all participants who were randomized and administered at least one study treatment during the study. The population of analysis was safety population (N=524).
|
0.38%
1/265 • Number of events 1
Safety population, defined as all participants who were randomized and administered at least one study treatment during the study. The population of analysis was safety population (N=524).
|
|
Infections and infestations
TYPHOID FEVER
|
0.00%
0/259
Safety population, defined as all participants who were randomized and administered at least one study treatment during the study. The population of analysis was safety population (N=524).
|
0.38%
1/265 • Number of events 1
Safety population, defined as all participants who were randomized and administered at least one study treatment during the study. The population of analysis was safety population (N=524).
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
VOMITING
|
2.3%
6/259 • Number of events 6
Safety population, defined as all participants who were randomized and administered at least one study treatment during the study. The population of analysis was safety population (N=524).
|
2.3%
6/265 • Number of events 6
Safety population, defined as all participants who were randomized and administered at least one study treatment during the study. The population of analysis was safety population (N=524).
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
DIARRHOEA
|
1.2%
3/259 • Number of events 3
Safety population, defined as all participants who were randomized and administered at least one study treatment during the study. The population of analysis was safety population (N=524).
|
1.1%
3/265 • Number of events 3
Safety population, defined as all participants who were randomized and administered at least one study treatment during the study. The population of analysis was safety population (N=524).
|
|
Infections and infestations
NAUSEA
|
0.00%
0/259
Safety population, defined as all participants who were randomized and administered at least one study treatment during the study. The population of analysis was safety population (N=524).
|
0.38%
1/265 • Number of events 1
Safety population, defined as all participants who were randomized and administered at least one study treatment during the study. The population of analysis was safety population (N=524).
|
|
General disorders
PYREXIA
|
1.2%
3/259 • Number of events 3
Safety population, defined as all participants who were randomized and administered at least one study treatment during the study. The population of analysis was safety population (N=524).
|
3.0%
8/265 • Number of events 8
Safety population, defined as all participants who were randomized and administered at least one study treatment during the study. The population of analysis was safety population (N=524).
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
COUGH
|
1.2%
3/259 • Number of events 3
Safety population, defined as all participants who were randomized and administered at least one study treatment during the study. The population of analysis was safety population (N=524).
|
0.75%
2/265 • Number of events 2
Safety population, defined as all participants who were randomized and administered at least one study treatment during the study. The population of analysis was safety population (N=524).
|
Additional Information
GSK Response Center
GlaxoSmithKline
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee GSK agreements may vary with individual investigators, but will not prohibit any investigator from publishing. GSK supports the publication of results from all centers of a multi-center trial but requests that reports based on single-site data not precede the primary publication of the entire clinical trial.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER