Injection With OnabotulinumtoxinA (Botox) for the Treatment of Chronic Pelvic Pain
NCT ID: NCT02173405
Last Updated: 2022-05-10
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE1
10 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2014-08-01
2016-09-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Botulinum Toxin Type A Versus Saline Trigger Point Injections for Myofascial Pelvic Pain
NCT01905137
Botulinum Toxin for Pelvic Pain in Women With Endometriosis
NCT01553201
Electromyographic Study for the Help and Guidance of BoNTA Administration in the Treatment of Chronic Pelvic Floor Pain
NCT03715777
Onabotulinumtoxin A Versus Kenalog for Chronic Pelvic Pain
NCT02369068
BTA vs Baclofen for Pelvic Myofascial Pain Syndrome
NCT05617118
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
STUDY RATIONALE: In MPP syndrome, prolonged muscle contraction, spasm, and inappropriately high muscle tone are thought to diminish blood supply and increase oxygen demand of the muscles of the pelvic floor. Ischemic muscle may secrete pain-producing substances, which further sensitize muscle nociceptors, alter receptor field properties, and convert wide-band mechanoreceptors to nociceptors. OnabotulinumtoxinA can directly block cholinergic neuromuscular transmission and interrupt the cascade of events that lead to hyperalgesia and allodynia. onabotulinumtoxinA plays a direct role by blocking the alpha- and gamma-motor neurons, thereby preventing the abnormal pattern of muscle contraction (eg, spasm, dystonia) that activates muscle nociceptors and sensitizes the muscle pain system through mediators.The investigators division has been utilizing pelvic floor injections of onabotulinumtoxinA as an off-label treatment for MPP in conjunction with pelvic floor physical therapy for more than 6 years. In patients with severe MPP, who often unable to tolerate any vaginal exam, or those receiving no further reduction in pelvic pain with extensive physical therapy, the investigators have been utilizing the injection of 100 U of onabotulinumtoxinA into pelvic floor trigger points with significant success. Anecdotally, treated patients report a 30-40% reduction in their pain complaints 7-10 days post-treatment which lasts for approximately 3 months. Even when the pain recurs, it is not as severe as it was pre-treatment and patients take the opportunity of the window of reduced pain to maximize further progress with pelvic floor physical therapy. Two to four weeks after pelvic floor injection, patients with severe MPP reported statistically significant changes in VAS scores before and after onabotulinumtoxinA treatment with a median reduction in VAS of -3.9 (CI for changed score -2.2, -5.6, p\<0.001). Eighty percent of patients reported significant subjective improvement in their pelvic pain lasting more than 4 weeks and anecdotally lasting up to 3 to 4 months in duration. Adverse events were reported by 22% of patients and were mild, limited to: pelvic heaviness, increased pain, urinary irritation, and nausea/vomiting. However, despite these encouraging results, there is no definitive evidence that onabotulinumtoxinA is an effective treatment modality in patients with severe MPP. In their evidence-based review of the literature regarding the treatment of refractory pain with onabotulinumtoxinA, Jabbari and Machado found only level C evidence (possibly effective, may be used at discretion of clinician) when investigated the role of onabotulinumtoxinAs in the treatment of MPP. Moreover, less is known regarding the potential side effects of onabotulinumtoxinA injected into the pelvic floor muscles. Therefore, stronger randomized controlled studies are necessary to investigate the efficacy and possible side effects of pelvic floor injections of onabotulinumtoxinA in the treatment of MPP syndrome and this is actually our research proposal. It is our hope that our study will significantly change current clinical treatment protocols for MPP syndrome.
STUDY DESIGN: This is a phase I study in which participants will be randomized 1:1 (onabotulinumtoxinA:placebo), double-blinded, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Potential participants are women seeking treatment for MPP as diagnosed by the participating clinical investigators based on the following criteria: MPP is defined by at least 4 to 5 palpable trigger points on transvaginal and/or transrectal examination of the pelvic floor, which reproduces the pain for which they are seeking medical care. A trigger point is defined as an extremely tender focus of muscle causing pain radiating to other areas specific for each trigger point. A trigger point is termed 'active' if pain occurs spontaneously, and 'latent' if palpation and pressure are required to elicit pain, which may replicate symptoms or radiate to surrounding lower extremity, pelvic and abdominal sites. This study will have two arms:\* Treatment group: 20 patients randomly assigned to receive 100 U onabotulinumtoxinA reconstituted in 20 ml saline sequentially injected bilaterally into the pubococcygeus, iliococcygeus, coccygeus, obturator internus, and piriformis muscles. \* Placebo group: 20 patients randomly assigned to receive 20 ml of saline bilaterally into the same pelvic floor muscles. All injections will be performed using a pudendal injection tray in the clinical treatment area after obtaining consent. The patients will be randomized using a computer-generated randomization sequences in balanced blocks of four. Both the patients and physicians will be blinded to the first injection assignment. All participants with inadequate symptom control (VAS score 7 or more) at 1 months after the injection will have their treatment unblinded. Those who received placebo (saline) will be offered injection with open label onabotlulinumA. Those who previously received onabotlulinumA will not be eligible for reinjection. All patients will be followed for 6 months after the initial injection or for 6 months following the second injection. All patients who opt for a second injection will once again begin the outlined injection follow-up visit schedule.
STUDY PROCEDURES:
Screening - A detailed medical and surgical history, demographic information and review of medications will be taken from all patients suspected of having MPP. Then, a physical exam and a pelvic floor examination for myofascial trigger points will be performed. It will include an assessment of VAS at the bilateral pubococcygeus, iliococcygeus, coccygeus, obturator internus, and piriformis muscles. All VAS scores will be recorded. Post residual Void (PVR) will be recorded. Patients will have an assessment of their post residual void (PVR) and the volume will be recorded. Patients who meet inclusion criteria will be offered study participation. Patients who agree to participate will be formally consented and complete all pertinent questionnaires: \* Short Form 12 (SF-12) for quality of life assessment \* Patient Global Impression Index (PGI-I) for degree of bother from pelvic pain \* Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI) and Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (PFIQ - short form 7) to assess the bladder and bowel functions \* Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) for sexual function assessment. Currently no validated questionnaire for symptoms of MPP exists.
Procedure - A pudendal block type needle is gently advanced along the outstretched fingers. Holding the needle in a near horizontal plane, the pelvic floor muscles are injected in a systematic fashion starting on the levator ani and then marching backward all the way down back to the piriformis muscle including the obturator internus muscle. The following muscles are sequentially injected with 2 cc of diluted onabotulinumtoxinA: pubococcygeus (this muscle is felt as a sling around the vagina, just proximal to the hymenal ring), iliococcygeus (palpated superiorly and laterally to pubococcygeus muscle), obturator internus (on the sidewalls of the pelvis just superior to the arcus tendineus levator ani), coccygeus (half distance between the ischial spine and sacrum), and piriformis (these muscles are palpated filling the posterolateral pelvic walls and are injected lateral to the sacrum). Careful attention is made to withdraw prior to injection to ensure no intravascular injection of the diluted onabotulinumtoxinA. Once the injection had been performed on one side of the pelvis, pressure is held for good hemostasis. The same procedure is then performed on the other side. Peri-procedural adverse events are recorded.
Post Procedure Instructions - Post treatment, all patients will be monitored for 15 minutes. Standardized post-injection instructions are given to the participant verbally and in written form. Patients will be contacted by telephone within 24-48 hours after the procedure for safety assessment. The first follow-up evaluation will be scheduled 1 month after pelvic floor injection.
Follow-Up Visits 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 \& Visit 8 (Visit 8, only if Patient Received 2nd Injection) - Follow-up clinic evaluations will occur 1, 2, 3, 4 and 6 months after injection, respectively. A history will be taken and a physical examination that includes PVR assessment will be performed at each follow-up visit. VAS scores of pelvic floor muscles will be recorded. PGI-I, PFDI, PFIQ, and FSFI forms will be collected at each follow-up visit. Adverse events will be carefully monitored and recorded.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
TREATMENT
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Treatment Group
20 patients randomly assigned to receive 100 U onabotulinumtoxinA reconstituted in 20 ml saline sequentially injected bilaterally into the pubococcygeus, iliococcygeus, coccygeus, obturator internus, and piriformis muscles.
OnabotulinumtoxinA
comparison of OnabotulinumtoxinA with placebo
Placebo group
20 patients randomly assigned to receive 20 ml of saline bilaterally into the same pelvic floor muscles.
Placebo
comparison of placebo with investigational drug OnabotulinumtoxinA
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
OnabotulinumtoxinA
comparison of OnabotulinumtoxinA with placebo
Placebo
comparison of placebo with investigational drug OnabotulinumtoxinA
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. MPP for at least 6 months with pain ranked \> 7/10 by VAS
3. Able to make medical decisions for herself
4. Ability to speak and understand English
5. Ability to follow study instructions and likely to complete all required visits 6 .Must give written informed consent before enrolment in this study
Exclusion Criteria
2. Pelvic floor physical therapy (PFPT) within the last 1 months
3. Pelvic surgery within the last 1 year
4. PVR greater than 150 ml
5. Presence of interstitial cystitis/ painful bladder syndrome (IC/PBS) by the current The National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK) criteria 37.
6. Evidence of pelvic pathology or other active diagnoses of acute or chronic pain syndromes including endometriosis, chronic cystitis, acute urinary tract infection, vaginitis, pelvic inflammatory disease, etc.
7. Breastfeeding, pregnant or contemplating pregnancy in the next 1 year or not on a current reliable form of birth control
8. Patients with known neurological diseases involving impaired neurotransmission, including myasthenia gravis and Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease
9. Patients who are on ambulatory anticoagulant therapy, including aspirin, who are unable to discontinue this treatment for 24 hours prior to the bladder injection
10. Women taking aminoglycosides at the time of injection (i.e. Cipro)
12\. Uncontrolled clinically significant medical condition other than the condition under investigation 13. Known allergy or sensitivity to any of the components in the study medication 14. Concurrent or past (within 1 months) participation in another investigational drug or device study 15. Any condition or situation that, in the investigators opinion, may put the patients at significant risk, confound the study results, or interfere significantly with the patients participation in the study
18 Years
65 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Allergan
INDUSTRY
University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Sangetta Mahajan MD
Assistant Professor & Head Division of Female Pelvic Medicine/Reconstructive Surgery/Obstetrics/Gynecology/Urology and Director of joint fellowship in Female Pelvic Medicine andReconstructive Surgery in the Departments of Obstetrics/Gynecology/Urology
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Sangetta Mahajan, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University Case Medical Center
Cleveland, Ohio, United States
University Hospitals Landerbrook Health Center, Urology
Mayfield Heights, Ohio, United States
University Hospitals Westlake Health Center, Urology
Westlake, Ohio, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
IIT #578
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
UHCMC IRB 04-13-45
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.