A Feasibility Study to Assess the Use of Gadolinium in Computed Tomography

NCT ID: NCT02163005

Last Updated: 2021-05-04

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

WITHDRAWN

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-12-31

Study Completion Date

2018-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Patients with an allergy to iodine based intravenous contrast cannot undergo a CT scan with contrast, unless they are premedicated. Premedication can result in a delay in diagnosis, that can be significant with acute conditions such as Pulmonary embolism.

The investigators are evaluating the use of Gadolinium as an alternative contrast agent in CT. Gadolinium has been used extensively in MRI exams but the dose that is used is not sufficient to provide good enhancement on CT. Dual Energy CT is a new technology that has better sensitivity to lower doses of intravenous contrast and the investigators aim to study its effectiveness in improving the enhancement with Gadolinium. The investigators will compare enhancement of Iodine with enhancement of Gadolinium during Dual Energy CT, to assess the possibility that Gadolinium could be used as an alternative for patients who are suspected of having Pulmonary embolism. They will recruit up to 50 patients who are having a routine Chest CT during treatment for a malignancy and administer Gadolinium contrast and Iodine contrast during a chest CT exam. The enhancement with the two agents can be compared.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Although safe in most patients, iodine may be associated with lifethreatening adverse events, particularly in high-risk patient. This application is of particular clinical significance in patients with conditions like pulmonary embolism which could be fatal. CT pulmonary angiogram (CTPA) with sensitivity of 83-100% and specificity of 89-97% is currently the gold standard for diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. However, in patients who have allergy to iodinated contrast agent, CTPA cannot be performed. Gadolinium based contrast agent can serve as a viable alternative in such patients and can be used for Gadolinium enhanced MR pulmonary angiography (MRPA) and CTPA. Gadolinium enhanced MRPA however has inherent limitations in evaluating pulmonary embolism as evident from multicentre prospective study (PIOPED III) which reported technically inadequate exams in as many as 25% of patients (range 11% to 52%). The MRPA sensitivity was also low in the range of 78%. Moreover, unlike CT, low spatial and temporal resolution of MR hampers precise evaluation of lung parenchyma. Previously investigators have evaluated gadolinium enhanced CTPA on a single energy CT (SECT) at different tube potential (80 - 120 kV) and reported encouraging results. However, these patients received higher volume of gadolinium contrast (mean 53 ml, range 30-64 ml) and in spite, the scans performed at 120 kV demonstrated overall suboptimal pulmonary artery enhancement. These limitations can be potentially over come with dual-energy CT which simultaneously acquires low and high energy data. From this data, monochromatic images can be reconstructed at any desired energy from 40 keV to 140 keV.

The investigators aim to recruit up to 50 patients who will guide in determining gadolinium contrast volume, injection rate and image delay required to maximize pulmonary arterial enhancement.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Contrast Media Allergy

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Gadolinium enhancement

Gadolinium enhancement will be performed using intravenous Dotarem\[recommended dose of 0.2 mL/kg (0.1 mmol Gd/kg )\]

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Gadolinium

Intervention Type DRUG

-agent will be administered intravenously and a CT scan will be performed to evaluate contrast enhancement characteristics of the agent to assess its feasibility as an alternative to Iodine based contrast agents.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Gadolinium

-agent will be administered intravenously and a CT scan will be performed to evaluate contrast enhancement characteristics of the agent to assess its feasibility as an alternative to Iodine based contrast agents.

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Dotarem

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* patients required to undergo a clinically indicated CT examination

Exclusion Criteria

* subject less than 56 yrs of age
* pregnant women
* Non English speaking
* Abnormal Renal function
* Allergy to Gadolinium
Minimum Eligible Age

56 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Massachusetts General Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Amita Sharma, MD

Radiologist

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Amita Sharma, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Massachusetts General Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Massachusetts General Hospital

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2012P002535a

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

CT DOSE Collaboratory
NCT03000751 COMPLETED NA
Pediatrics Mobile CT
NCT07166926 RECRUITING NA
Safety Study of CZ10 in Healthy Volunteers
NCT06708767 NOT_YET_RECRUITING PHASE1