Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
PHASE2
1 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2016-02-29
2019-06-11
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Biofeedback Therapy Versus Botox Injection in Treatment of Dyssynergic Defecation.
NCT06724250
Botox for the Treatment of Overactive Bladder Secondary to Benign Prostatic Obstruction
NCT01220726
Infracoccygeal Botox for Dyssynergia
NCT04879524
Effect and Tolerance of Botulinum A Toxin Rectal Injections on Fecal Incontinence
NCT02414425
Refractory Overactive Bladder: Sacral NEuromodulation v. BoTulinum Toxin Assessment (ROSETTA)
NCT01502956
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Biofeedback therapy and medical management are the standards of care for ODS. Typically patients are first managed with dietary modifications (fiber supplementation, increased fluids) and medication (laxatives, enemas). If constipation is not improved, they will undergo biofeedback, which lasts from 3-8 sessions on average. Biofeedback acts on the cause of ODS and it has good short-term success, but around 50%-70% of treated patients re-experience constipation after one year. The main drawbacks of biofeedback for ODS are the facts that it is expensive, time-consuming, available in few select-centers and its success depends very much on the provider. Biofeedback is delivered in multiple 1-hour clinic sessions, so many patients don't finish all recommended sessions and their constipation may recur faster.
Botox also acts on the cause of ODS and was shown to improve constipation within 1-3 weeks after the injection. Botox is delivered as a one-time injection in the puborectalis muscle and external anal sphincter (the muscle right around the anus). The injection can be performed in the clinic under local anesthesia, and the patient goes home afterwards. Currently, Botox is used for treatment of patients who fail biofeedback and medical management, to avoid the options of last resort (resection of the colon with stoma). To this day, no adequately designed study has confirmed that Botox is indeed superior to placebo (normal saline) for the treatment of ODS. The results from this study will provide valuable data on the ability of Botox to improve symptoms of constipation and the duration of its effect. This project has the potential to increase the availability of effective treatments for ODS.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Botulinum Toxin-A
Patients will receive Botulinum Toxin-A (Botox) injected in the puborectalis muscle and external anal sphincter. We will use 100 units of Botox, a dose with a good safety profile that has been proven to work in previous studies performed in adults.
Botulinum Toxin-A
100 Units diluted in a 5 cc syringe at a concentration of 20U/mL
Normal saline
Patients will receive normal saline (placebo) injected in the puborectalis muscle and external anal sphincter.
Normal Saline
Dispensed in a 5 cc syringe
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Botulinum Toxin-A
100 Units diluted in a 5 cc syringe at a concentration of 20U/mL
Normal Saline
Dispensed in a 5 cc syringe
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Competent to give informed consent
* Meet the Rome III diagnostic criteria for functional constipation
* Inability to relax the puborectalis muscle at electromyography
* Altomare Obstructed Defecation Syndrome score of 15 points or above
* Failure of treatment with 2 conservative measures which may be as follows:
* 1 laxative (osmotic or stimulant) for 2 weeks
* 1 fiber supplement for one month
* And/or trial of biofeedback for at least 4 sessions
Exclusion Criteria
* Known hypersensitivity to any of the components of the toxin
* Medication regimen includes narcotics
* Previous radiation therapy to the anal canal and rectum
* Prior proctectomy
* Presence of unhealed and symptomatic anal fissure
* Presence of anal pain
* Presence of fecal incontinence
* Presence of full thickness rectal prolapse
* Presence of internal sphincter myopathy
* Inflammatory bowel disease or proctitis
* Pregnancy or breast-feeding
* Subject is currently enrolled/ just finished participating in a clinical trial in which the intervention/ its carry-over effect may interact with the intervention in this trial
18 Years
90 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Massachusetts General Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Liliana Bordeianou
Assistant Professor of Surgery, Division of General and Gastrointestinal Surgery
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Liliana Bordeianou, M.D.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Massachusetts General Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Massachusetts General Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Shaheen NJ, Hansen RA, Morgan DR, Gangarosa LM, Ringel Y, Thiny MT, Russo MW, Sandler RS. The burden of gastrointestinal and liver diseases, 2006. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006 Sep;101(9):2128-38. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00723.x. Epub 2006 Jul 18.
Suares NC, Ford AC. Prevalence of, and risk factors for, chronic idiopathic constipation in the community: systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2011 Sep;106(9):1582-91; quiz 1581, 1592. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2011.164. Epub 2011 May 24.
American Gastroenterological Association; Bharucha AE, Dorn SD, Lembo A, Pressman A. American Gastroenterological Association medical position statement on constipation. Gastroenterology. 2013 Jan;144(1):211-7. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2012.10.029. No abstract available.
Maria G, Cadeddu F, Brandara F, Marniga G, Brisinda G. Experience with type A botulinum toxin for treatment of outlet-type constipation. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006 Nov;101(11):2570-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00791.x. Epub 2006 Oct 4.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Document Type: Informed Consent Form
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
MGH2014-P-000406
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.