Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold in Patients With Myocardial Infarction

NCT ID: NCT02151929

Last Updated: 2014-06-02

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

100 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2013-05-31

Study Completion Date

2014-04-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Evaluation of the feasibility and safety of Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold (BVS) in patient treated with primary PCI (pPCI).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Background. Drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation may offer benefits in terms of repeat revascularization in patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). The everolimus eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS) has shown efficacy and safety in stable patient but not in acute coronary syndromes. The study tested the feasibility and safety of BVS in patient treated with primary PCI (pPCI) Methods. Consecutive STEMI patients admitted within 12 hours of symptom onset and undergoing primary angioplasty and stent implantation at a tertiary center with 24-hour primary PCI capability will be randomly assigned to everolimus eluting stent (EES) or BVS. Primary endpoints are procedural and clinical success. The MACE (cardiac death, non fatal myocardial infarction, target lesion revascularization (TLR)) and definite or probable ST will be evaluated at six months.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

ST Elevation Acute Myocardial Infarction

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold

Implantation of of an everolimus eluting bioresorbable scaffold in patients with STEMI treated with primary PCI

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Bioresorbable vascular scaffold

Intervention Type DEVICE

stenting of an acute thrombotic lesion in patient within STEMI

Everolimus Eluting stent

Implantation of of an everolimus eluting stent in patients with STEMI treated with primary PCI

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Everolimus eluting stent

Intervention Type DEVICE

stenting of an acute thrombotic lesion in patient within STEMI

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Bioresorbable vascular scaffold

stenting of an acute thrombotic lesion in patient within STEMI

Intervention Type DEVICE

Everolimus eluting stent

stenting of an acute thrombotic lesion in patient within STEMI

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

BVS, ABSORB (Abbot Vascular) Xience Prime (Abbott Vascular)

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. chest pain for more than 30 minutes;
2. ST-segment elevation of 1 mm or more in 2 or more contiguous electrocardiograph leads or with presumably new left bundle-branch block

Exclusion Criteria

1. Active internal bleeding or a history of bleeding diathesis within the previous 30 days;
2. Contraindication to dual antiplatelet therapy for 12 months;
3. Known allergy to everolimus;
4. A history of stroke within 30 days or any history of hemorrhagic stroke;
5. History, symptoms, or findings suggestive of aortic dissection;
6. High-likelihood of death within BVS resorbtion time;
7. Cardiogenic shock;
8. Infarct artery reference diameter, \<2.0 mm or \>3.7 mm (i.e. not suitable for currently available BVS sizes);
9. Pregnancy;
10. Participation in other trials
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

85 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

San Giuseppe Moscati Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Emilio Di Lorenzo MD PhD

Dott. Emilio Di Lorenzo

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Emilio Di Lorenzo, MD PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Division of Cardiology AO Moscati Avellino ITALY

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Division of Cardiology Ao Moscati

Avellino, , Italy

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Italy

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Di Lorenzo E, Carbone G, Sauro L, Casafina A, Capasso M, Sauro R. Bare-metal stents versus drug-eluting stents for primary angioplasty: long-term outcome. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2011 Oct;13(5):459-64. doi: 10.1007/s11886-011-0207-0.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21792636 (View on PubMed)

De Luca G, Dirksen MT, Spaulding C, Kelbaek H, Schalij M, Thuesen L, van der Hoeven B, Vink MA, Kaiser C, Musto C, Chechi T, Spaziani G, Diaz de la Llera LS, Pasceri V, Di Lorenzo E, Violini R, Cortese G, Suryapranata H, Stone GW; Drug-Eluting Stent in Primary Angioplasty (DESERT) Cooperation. Drug-eluting vs bare-metal stents in primary angioplasty: a pooled patient-level meta-analysis of randomized trials. Arch Intern Med. 2012 Apr 23;172(8):611-21; discussion 621-2. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2012.758.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22529227 (View on PubMed)

Di Lorenzo E, Sauro R, Varricchio A, Capasso M, Lanzillo T, Manganelli F, Mariello C, Siano F, Pagliuca MR, Stanco G, Rosato G, De Luca G. Benefits of drug-eluting stents as compared to bare metal stent in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: four year results of the PaclitAxel or Sirolimus-Eluting stent vs bare metal stent in primary angiOplasty (PASEO) randomized trial. Am Heart J. 2009 Oct;158(4):e43-50. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2009.03.016.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19781402 (View on PubMed)

Di Lorenzo E, De Luca G, Sauro R, Varricchio A, Capasso M, Lanzillo T, Manganelli F, Mariello C, Siano F, Pagliuca MR, Stanco G, Rosato G. The PASEO (PaclitAxel or Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Versus Bare Metal Stent in Primary Angioplasty) Randomized Trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2009 Jun;2(6):515-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2009.03.012.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19539255 (View on PubMed)

Ormiston JA, Serruys PW, Regar E, Dudek D, Thuesen L, Webster MW, Onuma Y, Garcia-Garcia HM, McGreevy R, Veldhof S. A bioabsorbable everolimus-eluting coronary stent system for patients with single de-novo coronary artery lesions (ABSORB): a prospective open-label trial. Lancet. 2008 Mar 15;371(9616):899-907. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60415-8.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18342684 (View on PubMed)

Serruys PW, Onuma Y, Ormiston JA, de Bruyne B, Regar E, Dudek D, Thuesen L, Smits PC, Chevalier B, McClean D, Koolen J, Windecker S, Whitbourn R, Meredith I, Dorange C, Veldhof S, Miquel-Hebert K, Rapoza R, Garcia-Garcia HM. Evaluation of the second generation of a bioresorbable everolimus drug-eluting vascular scaffold for treatment of de novo coronary artery stenosis: six-month clinical and imaging outcomes. Circulation. 2010 Nov 30;122(22):2301-12. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.970772. Epub 2010 Nov 15.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21098436 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

AOM_BVS1

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Complete Lesion Versus Culprit Lesion Revascularization
NCT01180218 TEMPORARILY_NOT_AVAILABLE