Efficacy and Safety of Mitiglinide vs Acarbose in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
NCT ID: NCT02143765
Last Updated: 2016-07-14
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
248 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2014-05-31
2015-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
This was a 12-week, open, randomized study for comparing Mitiglinide versus Acarbose. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Mitiglinide vs Acarbose in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Effect of Combination of Mitiglinide and Metformin on Glycemic Control in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
NCT01037842
Comparison of Metformin and Repaglinide Monotherapy in the Treatment of New Onset Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in China
NCT02040246
Dose Comparisons of Leucine-Metformin Combinations on Blood Glucose Levels In Type 2 Diabetic Patients
NCT02151461
Diabetes Study With Rosiglitazone Monotherapy Versus Metformin Or Glyburide/Glibenclamide
NCT00279045
Mitiglinide in Combination With Metformin vs. Metformin Alone in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
NCT00519142
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Mitiglinide
Mitiglinide 10 mg three times a day, orally, for 12 weeks
Mitiglinide
three times a day, orally, for 12 weeks
Acarbose
Acarbose 50 mg three times a day, orally, for 12 weeks
Acarbose
three times a day, orally, for 12 weeks
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Mitiglinide
three times a day, orally, for 12 weeks
Acarbose
three times a day, orally, for 12 weeks
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Subjects with type-2 diabetes mellitus diagnosed according to 1999 WHO criteria within 5 years
3. Subjects who had not received insulin secretagogues, insulin sensitizers, incretin mimetics or alpha-glucosidase inhibitors
4. Subjects whose fasting blood glucose \[FBG\] between7.0 and10.0 mmol/L and HbA1c ratio is between 7.0% and 10.0%
Note: Incretin mimetics contain glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist (including GLP-1 analogues) and dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Subjects with renal disfunction whose plasma creatinine concentration are more than 1.1 ULN or positive urine protein
3. Subjects with severe heart disease, liver diseases, kidney disease and other serious organic disease
4. Subjects who have chronic intestinal diseases associated with marked disorders of digestion or absorption and may deteriorate as a result of increased gas formation in the intestine (like Gastrocardiac Syndrome, severe hernia, intestinal obstruction, intestinal ulcer and intestinal surgery)
5. Subjects with endocrine system diseases such as hyperthyroidism and cushing's syndrome etc.
6. Subject is contraindicated or hypersensitivity to both experimental drugs or comparator drugs
7. Subjects who participated in other clinical studies as subjects within 3 months before this study
8. Female subjects who have been pregnant , lactating or without contraception in childbearing potential
9. Subjects judged unfit for this study by investigators
18 Years
70 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Zhongda Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Zilin Sun
Chief of Department of Endocrinology, Zhongda Hospital, Institute of Diabetes
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
The First People's Hospital of Changzhou
Changzhou, Jiangsu, China
The Second People's Hospital of Huai'an
Huai'an, Jiangsu, China
Department of Endocrinology, Zhongda Hospital, Institute of Diabetes, Southeast University
Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
Xuzhou Central Hospital
Xuzhou, Jiangsu, China
Yancheng City No.1 People's Hospital
Yancheng, Jiangsu, China
Zhenjiang First People's Hospital
Zhenjiang, Jiangsu, China
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
LV Xiaofeng. Clinical study on efficacy and safety of mitiglinide on type 2 diabetes mellitus. Chinese Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 2009, 14(2):175-179.
Zhu Q, Tong Y, Wu T, Li J, Tong N. Comparison of the hypoglycemic effect of acarbose monotherapy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus consuming an Eastern or Western diet: a systematic meta-analysis. Clin Ther. 2013 Jun;35(6):880-99. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2013.03.020. Epub 2013 Apr 18.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
ZhongdaH-Match
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.