Epidural Analgesia for Pancreatitis (Epipan Study)

NCT ID: NCT02126332

Last Updated: 2020-05-01

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

148 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-06-06

Study Completion Date

2019-02-26

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Acute pancreatitis (AP) is a common disease whose incidence in the US reaches 35 per 100,000 population annually. Its main causes in adults are gallstone migration into the common bile duct and alcohol abuse. Approximately 80% of patients with AP will develop a mild disease for which the management is mainly conservative. However 20% will develop a severe form, which is known to be associated with the development of local complications, such as pancreatic and peripancreatic necrosis, pseudocysts, and systemic complications, such as adult respiratory distress syndrome or renal failure. In the severe form of AP the mortality rate can reach 17% mainly due to multiple organ failure and pancreatic necrosis. In particular, pancreatic necrosis is associated with a death rate of up to 40%.

Epidural anesthesia (EA) is widely used to induce analgesia in the perioperative period and has also been used to decrease pain in patients with AP. In addition, experimental studies have shown a specific beneficial effect of EA in AP, attributed to an anti-inflammatory effect of local anesthetics administered in the epidural space combined with a sympathetic nerve blockade, which redistributes splanchnic blood flow to non-perfused pancreatic regions.

To date, EA has not been adequately tested in intensive care unit (ICU) patients with severe AP, with regards to clinical outcome. The objective of our study is therefore to test the effect of EA on lung dysfunction during severe AP, as we hypothesize that EA could limit lung failure requiring invasive mechanical ventilation (MV) or the duration of invasive MV

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

BACKGROUND:

Mild acute pancreatitis has a low mortality rate, but patients with severe acute pancreatitis (AP) are more likely to have complications and a much higher death rate. Severe pancreatic injury occurs in 20% of the patients, and 15% to 25% of these patients will not survive. The amplifying effects of inflammatory and oxidative impairment often lead to SAP-induced complications, which are often regarded as hallmarks of severe AP and herald a noted poor outcome. Since respiratory failure is the main cause of death in patients with severe AP, more work is needed for us to prevent and treat AP-associated lung dysfunction Despite recent substantial improvements in the multidisciplinary management of AP (with special emphasis on fluid therapy, intensive care management, prevention of infectious complications, nutritional support, biliary tract management or necrotizing pancreatitis management), the prognosis of severe AP remains poor in patients who develop acute respiratory failure requiring intubation and invasive respiratory support.

Animal studies suggest that epidural analgesia (EA) may decrease the severity of AP. EA is associated with sympathetic nerve blockade, which redistributes splanchnic blood flow to non-perfused pancreatic regions, and it may improve the pancreatic hypoperfusion induced by AP. EA also decreases the severity of metabolic acidosis and tissue injury, thus preventing the progression from an edematous disease to a necrotizing AP.

To date, EA has not been adequately tested in patients with severe AP as compared to conventional management, and with special emphasis on its putative beneficial ventilatory effects.

DESIGN NARRATIVE:

The purpose of this multicenter, prospective, randomized, controlled, trial is to test the effects of thoracic EA on pulmonary outcome in patients with severe AP.

After inclusion, ICU patients with severe AP will be randomized into 2 groups: a " conventional group " in which available guidelines on analgesia are applied, and an " EA " group in which patients receive thoracic EA for at least 3 days. Beyond the analgesic strategy, recent consensual guidelines on the management of severe AP are applied.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Severe Acute Pancreatitis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Conventional group

2 groups: a " conventional group " in which available guidelines on analgesia are applied, and an " EA " group in which patients receive thoracic EA for at least 3 days.

Group Type OTHER

acetaminophen, nefopam, tramadol, opidoids

Intervention Type OTHER

Conventional analgesia will include enteral and/or parental administration of usual analgesics, ranging from step 1 to step 3 drugs according to WHO classification (including acetaminophen, nefopam, tramadol, opidoids). The route, dose and frequency of analgesics administrations will be based on participating ICUs protocols.

EA group (Epidural anesthesia )

2 groups: a " conventional group " in which available guidelines on analgesia are applied, and an " EA " group in which patients receive thoracic EA for at least 3 days.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

ropivacaine and sufentanil

Intervention Type OTHER

Thoracic epidural analgesia will be performed using ropivacaine (2 mg/ml), sufentanil (0.5 microg/ml) administered through a patient-controlled deviced (PCEA : patient-controlled epidural analgesia). PCEA parameters will be fixed as follows : continuous administration of 5 to 15 ml/h and bolus of 3 to 10 ml every 10 minutes. Iterative epidural administration of clonidine (1 mckg/kg) will be allowed to achieve analgesia goals.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

ropivacaine and sufentanil

Thoracic epidural analgesia will be performed using ropivacaine (2 mg/ml), sufentanil (0.5 microg/ml) administered through a patient-controlled deviced (PCEA : patient-controlled epidural analgesia). PCEA parameters will be fixed as follows : continuous administration of 5 to 15 ml/h and bolus of 3 to 10 ml every 10 minutes. Iterative epidural administration of clonidine (1 mckg/kg) will be allowed to achieve analgesia goals.

Intervention Type OTHER

acetaminophen, nefopam, tramadol, opidoids

Conventional analgesia will include enteral and/or parental administration of usual analgesics, ranging from step 1 to step 3 drugs according to WHO classification (including acetaminophen, nefopam, tramadol, opidoids). The route, dose and frequency of analgesics administrations will be based on participating ICUs protocols.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients admitted to the ICU for acute pancreatitis

Exclusion Criteria

* Absolute contra-indication for thoracic epidural catheter placement (Prothrombin time \< 60%, Platelet count \< 75G/l, curative anticoagulant therapy interrupted for less than 8 hours, local infection, active central nervous system infection, history of back surgery associated with a dural space procedure, suspected or confirmed intracranial hypertension, refractory circulatory shock)
* Refractory circulatory shock despite appropriate resuscitation
* Known allergy to ropivacain, sufentanil or clonidine
* Age under 18
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Matthieu JABAUDON

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

CHU de Clermont-Ferrand

Clermont-Ferrand, , France

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Jabaudon M, Genevrier A, Jaber S, Windisch O, Bulyez S, Laterre PF, Escudier E, Sossou A, Guerci P, Bertrand PM, Danin PE, Bonnassieux M, Buhler L, Heidegger CP, Chabanne R, Godet T, Roszyk L, Sapin V, Futier E, Pereira B, Constantin JM; EPIPAN study group. Thoracic epidural analgesia in intensive care unit patients with acute pancreatitis: the EPIPAN multicenter randomized controlled trial. Crit Care. 2023 May 31;27(1):213. doi: 10.1186/s13054-023-04502-w.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 37259157 (View on PubMed)

Bulyez S, Pereira B, Caumon E, Imhoff E, Roszyk L, Bernard L, Buhler L, Heidegger C, Jaber S, Lefrant JY, Chabanne R, Bertrand PM, Laterre PF, Guerci P, Danin PE, Escudier E, Sossou A, Morand D, Sapin V, Constantin JM, Jabaudon M; EPIPAN Study Group; AzuRea network. Epidural analgesia in critically ill patients with acute pancreatitis: the multicentre randomised controlled EPIPAN study protocol. BMJ Open. 2017 May 29;7(5):e015280. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015280.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 28554928 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2013-004652-37

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: secondary_id

CHU-0188

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Pain AND Opioids After Surgery
NCT05877157 RECRUITING