Multi-Center Comparison of Dual Lumen Versus Single Lumen Ureteroscopes
NCT ID: NCT02123082
Last Updated: 2025-03-13
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
156 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2014-07-02
2021-04-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The purpose of this research is to compare the efficacy and safety of the ureteroscopes that have only one channel for instrument insertion with the newer ureteroscope that has two channels for utilization during stone treatment.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
The Role of Ureteral Stenting Following Uncomplicated Ureteroscopy for Ureteral and Renal Stones: A Randomized, Controlled Trial
NCT03130907
Tip-flexible Semi-rigid Ureterorenoscope Versus Flexible Ureteroscopy in Renal Calculi
NCT02426931
Prospective Comparison Between Different Laser Settings for Ureteral \ Kidney Stones Treatment During Ureteroscopy
NCT02279927
Comparing Treatment of Urolithiasis Between Disposable and Reusable Ureteroscope
NCT03040466
Single-use Digital Flexible Ureteroscope vs Nondisposable Fiber Optic vs Digital Ureteroscope
NCT03220516
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
This study will be prospective, multi-institutional randomized controlled trial comparing single lumen and dual lumen ureteroscopes. Specifically, a new double-lumen ureteroscope will be compared in a multicenter trial with the currently existing single-lumen ureteroscopes in patients undergoing ureteroscopy for stones in the kidney and ureter.
Patient Recruitment and Randomization
All patients presenting to the Department of Urology at University of California, Irvine, University of Toronto and North Shore-LIJ Health System requiring a flexible ureteroscopy for treatment of their kidney or ureteral stone disease will be approached for enrolment in the study, assuming the inclusion and exclusion criteria detailed below are met. After discussion of the study with potential participants, interested parties will be given a copy of the consent form. The investigator will review and explain the consent form with the potential subject. All information about the study will be provided. Ample time will be given for individuals to ask questions regarding participation and to have questions answered prior to signing the consent form. If so desired, those interested will be given a copy of the consent form to take home so that they may have the opportunity to discuss participation further with family and/or advisors. If an individual chooses to enroll, the consent form will be signed before procedure begins. Once an individual joins the study and informed consent is obtained, the subject will receive a signed copy of the consent form. Individuals may chose not be enrolled in the study or may withdraw from the study at any time without repercussions to subsequent care.
Patients agreeing to participate in the study will be randomized on the day of surgery. Stratified block randomization will be utilized to balance the number of patients with different stone sizes (\>1cm, \<1cm), kidney, proximal and distal ureteral stones between the two groups.
Device description
The Wolf Cobra Richard (Wolf Endoscopy, Vernon Hills, IL), a dual-lumen flexible ureteroscope is currently the only existing device with two working channels utilized in the operating room. Wolf Cobra has a shaft size of 9.9F. Each of the Cobra's two channels is 3.3 F in size (smaller compared with regular ureteroscopes 3.6F) but give a larger total cross-sectional area when two combined together. Atraumatic 6 Fr. distal tip dilates to a 9.9 Fr. sheath for ease of entry.
A dual-channel ureteroscope may provide several advantages. Having additional working channel enables better irrigation than a single-channel ureteroscope. It is achieved by continuous inflow and outflow, which might significantly, improve intraoperative visualization and maintains a clear field of view by efficient cleaning of blood, debris, and stone, even when utilizing multiple instruments simultaneously. Usually, multiple passes with different instruments requires the surgeon to reposition the ureteroscope in order to change the instruments which can potentially reduce efficiency and increase the length of operative time. The second working channel will allow the surgeon to use multiple instruments simultaneously while maintaining the flow and efficiently treat the stone or other pathology (Figure 1). This feature may offer technical advantages
Outcomes
Preoperatively, all patients will undergo a diagnostic imaging (CT, KUB, US) to identify the stone burden and location. Follow up imaging will be standardized across all participating institutions and will include CT or KUB imaging after the procedure to identify residual stones.
The primary outcome of the study will be the procedure time (minutes). This will be measured from the start of the endoscopic access to the end of the procedure including complete fragmentation and stone fragment removal.
The following data will also be recorded and serve as the secondary outcomes:
1. Stone clearance rate (Will be defined by URS and postoperative imaging)
2. Total ureteroscopy time
3. Stone fragmentation time (this time will be recorded from start of first lithotripsy till complete stone fragmentation)
4. Stone clearance time
5. Overall procedure time (including positioning, URS procedure, extubation)
6. Requirement for a second procedure
7. Intraoperative complications
8. Immediate postoperative complications
9. Postoperative complications within 30 days of the procedure
10. Surgeon's opinion and comfort (rank from 1-10?)
11. Visibility using a questionnaire or rank from 1 to 10.
12. Ureteroscope durability
Additionally, patient demographics and clinical characteristics such as age, gender, Charlson comorbidity index, ASA, BMI, previous medical and surgical history will be collected. Stone characteristics such as size, location, density (HU) will be recorded. For each patient, three (width, length and depth) largest diameters of the stone will be measured from preoperative CT and volume will be calculated for accurate stone measurements. All preoperative and postoperative outcomes will be compared based on the stone characteristics such as size, location and type of stone (HU)
Deflection Angles
New single lumen and double lumen ureteroscopes will be used for the purpose of this study. To avoid any confounding factors, these scopes will be used exclusively on patients who are involved in the trial. Every week each ureteroscope will be assessed for maximal deflection, which is defined as the angle between the tangents of the deflection point and the tip of the ureteroscopes, as described by Monga and Parkin9,10. In order to calculate the angle, a photocopy of the ureteroscope while in maximal deflection will be taken. Both upward and downward angles of deflections will be measured three times and the mean value will be subsequently calculated for each type of ureteroscope prior to first usage. These measurements will be performed after each week of usage. After the last case of the study, the maximal angle of deflection for each of the two types of ureteroscopes will be measured again and will be compared to the measurement at the beginning of the study.
Fatigability Fatigability of a given ureteroscope is defined as decrease of the maximum amount of deflection of the tip4. The fatigability of each ureteroscope will be measured by subtracting the mean value of maximal deflection at the end of the study from the maximum deflection measured at the beginning of the study.
Subjective Assessments
After each procedure, the surgeon that performs the endoscopic procedure will be asked to rate the image quality of the scope by filling out a questionnaire from 1-10 (1 being poor and 10 being excellent visualization). These subjective assessments will be the investigators secondary outcomes. Additionally, the ease of deflection and overall scope performance will be asked.
Once each ureteroscope reaches a point where it will require repair, it will be shipped to the manufacturing company. The reason for repair will be recorded, and the type and cost of each repair will be documented.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Single-Lumen Ureteroscope
Subjects enrolled in this study arm will have their procedure performed using the single lumen ureteroscopes. This scope is currently employed in clinical practice, including at UC Irvine Medical Center.
Storz single Lumen Ureteroscope
Single lumen, flexible scope for ureteroscopies
Dual Lumen Ureteroscope
Dual lumen, flexible scope for ureteroscopies
Dual Lumen Ureteroscope
Subjects enrolled in this study arm will have their procedure performed using the dual lumen ureteroscopes. This scope is currently employed in clinical practice, including at UC Irvine Medical Center.
Storz single Lumen Ureteroscope
Single lumen, flexible scope for ureteroscopies
Dual Lumen Ureteroscope
Dual lumen, flexible scope for ureteroscopies
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Storz single Lumen Ureteroscope
Single lumen, flexible scope for ureteroscopies
Dual Lumen Ureteroscope
Dual lumen, flexible scope for ureteroscopies
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Patients with \<2 cm total burden of renal or ureteral stones eligible for flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Patients who are not able to give consent for study
3. Patients with active urinary tract infection
4. Pregnant women
5. Patients who have had ureteroscopy, SWL or PCNL for the same stone on the ipsilateral kidney
18 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of California, Irvine
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Jaime Landman
Professor of Urology and Radiology
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Jaime Landman, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of California, Irvine
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of California, Irvine Medical Center
Orange, California, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
20141060
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.