Quantitative Detection of Circulating Donor-Specific DNA in Organ Transplant Recipients (DTRT-Multi-Center Study)
NCT ID: NCT02109575
Last Updated: 2021-03-26
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
540 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2014-03-01
2020-03-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
This research study proposes testing a blood sample obtained from the heart transplant recipient. The research seeks to establish whether this blood test will show when the patient is beginning to or already rejecting the transplanted heart.
BACKGROUND Identifying if a transplant patient is beginning to or already rejecting the heart is necessary, so that appropriate treatment can be started to halt the rejection. Heart catheterization with biopsy is the usual method used for assessing whether a patient may be rejecting the heart. There are also a number of other methods that transplant physicians will use to look for signs of rejection including other blood tests, echocardiograms, obtaining pressure readings during heart catheterization, and micro-array testing of blood obtained during biopsy. These technologies are limited in ability to consistently and accurately identify the presence of rejection.
The usual method of checking for rejection involves obtaining a sample of the heart tissue (heart biopsy); biopsy can only be accomplished through heart catheterization which is an invasive procedure that has risks associated with disturbing the heart such as puncturing the heart or causing the heart rate to change or damaging tissue in the heart. Overtime, repeating this invasive procedure can diminish the ease of the procedure because the veins can become scarred and more difficult to access. For these reasons, researchers believe that it would be good to have a blood test that gives information about the possibility of rejection so that it may not be necessary to do as many heart biopsies. Also, a blood test may be able to provide information about the heart or about rejection that is currently not available at all.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Non Invasive Blood Test To Diagnose Acute Rejection After Kidney Transplantation
NCT02424227
Dd-cfDNA and Treg in Prediction of Kidney Transplant Acute Rejection
NCT05084768
Donor Derived Cell-free DNA and Rejection of Kidney Allografts
NCT05995379
A Multicenter, Prospective Blood Collection Study in a Kidney Transplant Population
NCT07006831
Donor-Derived Cell-free DNA to DETect REjection in Cardiac Transplantation
NCT05081739
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The current gold standard in detection of rejection is the use of endomyocardial biopsy. Attaining these samples is invasive and long term repeated central venous access can be difficult. Risk of endomyocardial biopsy includes perforation leading to cardiac tamponade, arrhythmias including atrial fibrillation, pneumothorax, hemothorax, and valvular regurgitation secondary to rupture of chordae or damage to valve leaflets themselves. There is variability in pathological interpretation of histologic grades, especially at higher grades of rejection due to the difficulty in interpretation of nodular infiltrates. The 2005 revised ISHLT grading system has simplified the grading system of cellular rejection and now includes assessment of antibody mediated rejection. This may improve the utility of endomyocardial biopsy, but much controversy still exists on the method of grading rejection and its clinical implications. Thus, the development of a noninvasive, relatively inexpensive method that accurately predicts the presence of rejection is critical.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Heart Transplant Recipients
Up to 10 cc of blood will be drawn from heart transplant recipients at various time points prior to and after transplant. Blood draw is the only research activity that study participants will undergo. In addition to blood draw, data will be collected from clinical records representing the participant's transplant course such as the medical record, imaging, and biopsy slides with pathology reports.
Blood Draw of up to 10 ml
In a laboratory setting, the blood will be spun for plasma and buffy coat, DNA will be extracted for processing using the diagnostic test. The results of the test are not provided back to the clinical setting.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Blood Draw of up to 10 ml
In a laboratory setting, the blood will be spun for plasma and buffy coat, DNA will be extracted for processing using the diagnostic test. The results of the test are not provided back to the clinical setting.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
Any patient who is not anticipated to be available for follow-up of at least 1 year;
Any patient who is unable or unwilling to provide documented informed consent for self or through a legally authorized representative.
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
NIH
Columbia University
OTHER
Duke University
OTHER
Arkansas Children's Hospital Research Institute
OTHER
Emory University
OTHER
Children's Healthcare of Atlanta
OTHER
Vanderbilt University
OTHER
TAI Diagnostics, Inc.
INDUSTRY
Ann & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago
OTHER
Children's Hospital and Health System Foundation, Wisconsin
OTHER
University of California, Los Angeles
OTHER
Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati
OTHER
Phoenix Children's Hospital
OTHER
The Cleveland Clinic
OTHER
Medical College of Wisconsin
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Michael Mitchell
Professor Cardiovascular Surgery
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Michael Mitchell, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Medical College of Wisconsin
Aoy Tomita-Mitchell, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Medical College of Wisconsin
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Arkansas Children's Hosoptial Research Institute
Little Rock, Arkansas, United States
Emory University
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital Chicago
Chicago, Illinois, United States
Columbia University
New York, New York, United States
Duke University
Durham, North Carolina, United States
Vanderbilt University
Nashville, Tennessee, United States
Children's Hospital of Wisconsin
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States
Froedtert Hospital
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CHW 10/83
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.