Quantitative Detection of Circulating Donor-Specific DNA in Organ Transplant Recipients (DTRT-Multi-Center Study)

NCT ID: NCT02109575

Last Updated: 2021-03-26

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

540 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-03-01

Study Completion Date

2020-03-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The primary goal of this Multicenter Study is to develop and to evaluate a method for measuring donor-specific cell free DNA in blood samples from transplant recipients as markers of rejection. Blood samples obtained periodically from heart transplant recipients are assessed for cell free DNA relative to clinical data in order to determine whether changes in the level of cell free DNA indicate rejection.

This research study proposes testing a blood sample obtained from the heart transplant recipient. The research seeks to establish whether this blood test will show when the patient is beginning to or already rejecting the transplanted heart.

BACKGROUND Identifying if a transplant patient is beginning to or already rejecting the heart is necessary, so that appropriate treatment can be started to halt the rejection. Heart catheterization with biopsy is the usual method used for assessing whether a patient may be rejecting the heart. There are also a number of other methods that transplant physicians will use to look for signs of rejection including other blood tests, echocardiograms, obtaining pressure readings during heart catheterization, and micro-array testing of blood obtained during biopsy. These technologies are limited in ability to consistently and accurately identify the presence of rejection.

The usual method of checking for rejection involves obtaining a sample of the heart tissue (heart biopsy); biopsy can only be accomplished through heart catheterization which is an invasive procedure that has risks associated with disturbing the heart such as puncturing the heart or causing the heart rate to change or damaging tissue in the heart. Overtime, repeating this invasive procedure can diminish the ease of the procedure because the veins can become scarred and more difficult to access. For these reasons, researchers believe that it would be good to have a blood test that gives information about the possibility of rejection so that it may not be necessary to do as many heart biopsies. Also, a blood test may be able to provide information about the heart or about rejection that is currently not available at all.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Early detection of rejection is a major focus of organ transplant care. The use of aggressive immunosuppressive therapy has been shown to alter the prognosis of heart transplant patients who have acute rejection1. There are many modalities utilized in the routine surveillance of heart transplant patients, each with limitations. Screening transthoracic echocardiography focusing on indices of systolic and diastolic dysfunction, along with regional wall abnormalities, has been shown to have poor sensitivity and does not effectively discriminate between patients with and without rejection. Newer echocardiographic parameters including myocardial performance or diastolic velocity indices may be a better means of detecting subtle changes in cardiac function in the setting of heart transplant, but these tools are most helpful after the insult caused by rejection has already occurred. Hemodynamic changes measured during heart catheterization have also been evaluated as a means of detecting rejection. Rosenthal et al found that although there were statistically significant differences between patients with higher or lower grades of rejection scores, heart catheterization did not permit effective discrimination of patients with moderate to severe rejection. Heart biomarkers, including c-reactive protein, brain natriuretic peptides, and troponin, have been studied as non-invasive measures of determining heart dysfunction or rejection. These surrogates are weakly associated with different rejection grades on biopsy and have a poor predictive capacity for biopsy-detected rejection3. Recently, microarray technology has been used to screen for genes expressed in heart allograft rejection using peripheral leukocytes from blood samples obtained at the time of endomyocardial biopsy. This technique was shown to have a high negative predictive value for the diagnosis of acute cellular rejection but it is unable to detect low grades of rejection4. Overall, these technologies are limited in the ability to consistently and accurately predict the presence of rejection and have low positive predictive values when compared to biopsy.

The current gold standard in detection of rejection is the use of endomyocardial biopsy. Attaining these samples is invasive and long term repeated central venous access can be difficult. Risk of endomyocardial biopsy includes perforation leading to cardiac tamponade, arrhythmias including atrial fibrillation, pneumothorax, hemothorax, and valvular regurgitation secondary to rupture of chordae or damage to valve leaflets themselves. There is variability in pathological interpretation of histologic grades, especially at higher grades of rejection due to the difficulty in interpretation of nodular infiltrates. The 2005 revised ISHLT grading system has simplified the grading system of cellular rejection and now includes assessment of antibody mediated rejection. This may improve the utility of endomyocardial biopsy, but much controversy still exists on the method of grading rejection and its clinical implications. Thus, the development of a noninvasive, relatively inexpensive method that accurately predicts the presence of rejection is critical.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Cardiovascular Disease Acute Rejection of Cardiac Transplant Cardiac Transplant Rejection Heart Transplant Failure and Rejection

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Heart Transplant Recipients

Up to 10 cc of blood will be drawn from heart transplant recipients at various time points prior to and after transplant. Blood draw is the only research activity that study participants will undergo. In addition to blood draw, data will be collected from clinical records representing the participant's transplant course such as the medical record, imaging, and biopsy slides with pathology reports.

Blood Draw of up to 10 ml

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

In a laboratory setting, the blood will be spun for plasma and buffy coat, DNA will be extracted for processing using the diagnostic test. The results of the test are not provided back to the clinical setting.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Blood Draw of up to 10 ml

In a laboratory setting, the blood will be spun for plasma and buffy coat, DNA will be extracted for processing using the diagnostic test. The results of the test are not provided back to the clinical setting.

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

Any patient who is "listed" to undergo or has in the past undergone heart transplantation.

Exclusion Criteria

Any patient who is not currently listed to undergo heart transplantation or has not previously received a heart transplant;

Any patient who is not anticipated to be available for follow-up of at least 1 year;

Any patient who is unable or unwilling to provide documented informed consent for self or through a legally authorized representative.
Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

Columbia University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Duke University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Arkansas Children's Hospital Research Institute

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Emory University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Children's Healthcare of Atlanta

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Vanderbilt University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

TAI Diagnostics, Inc.

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Ann & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Children's Hospital and Health System Foundation, Wisconsin

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of California, Los Angeles

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Phoenix Children's Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

The Cleveland Clinic

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Medical College of Wisconsin

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Michael Mitchell

Professor Cardiovascular Surgery

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Michael Mitchell, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Medical College of Wisconsin

Aoy Tomita-Mitchell, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Medical College of Wisconsin

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Arkansas Children's Hosoptial Research Institute

Little Rock, Arkansas, United States

Site Status

Emory University

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital Chicago

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Columbia University

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Duke University

Durham, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Vanderbilt University

Nashville, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Children's Hospital of Wisconsin

Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

Froedtert Hospital

Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

R01HL119747

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

CHW 10/83

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Genome Transplant Dynamics
NCT02423070 RECRUITING