Feasibility and Validity of A Novel Computer Based Battery of Assessments in the Elderly

NCT ID: NCT02109419

Last Updated: 2019-09-06

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

57 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-03-31

Study Completion Date

2014-10-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

While standard pencil-and-paper test have continued to be useful for the monitoring of cognition, mood, and life space (LS) in the elderly they do have considerable limitations. Use of these pencil-and-paper tests requires that individuals come to the clinic for assessments, which results in significant clinical costs and practical limitations in the conducting of assessments in large numbers of individuals, and provides a time consuming and non-automated means of quantifying and recording changes in brain function. It is increasingly recognized that there is a need to develop valid and reliable computer based assessments to allow for the remote assessment of cognition, mood, and other parameters. Development of computerized based assessments will significantly increase the scale, scope, and speed with which cognition and mood can be measured in the elderly.

Helping Hands Technology LLC (HHT) has developed a number of web based assessments of cognition, mood, and LS. These new computerized assessments will be developed using new technology, and are based on the general principles found in existing pencil-and-paper based assessments of cognition, mood, and LS. In addition, HHT is developing proprietary means of reporting the results of the computerized assessments in an easy to use narrative format. This study will focus on quantifying the feasibility and validity of using HHT computerized assessments.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

See Brief Summary Section.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Computerized Assessment Feasibility and Validity

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

CASE_CONTROL

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

All participants

All participants, including control, mild cognitive impairment, and dementia.

HHT-G

Intervention Type OTHER

Helping Hands Technology global cognitive function assessment

HHT-D

Intervention Type OTHER

Helping Hands Technology depression assessment

Geriatric Depression Scale (DGS)

Intervention Type OTHER

Geriatric Depression Scale (DGS)

MMSE

Intervention Type OTHER

Mini Mental State Exam

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

HHT-G

Helping Hands Technology global cognitive function assessment

Intervention Type OTHER

HHT-D

Helping Hands Technology depression assessment

Intervention Type OTHER

Geriatric Depression Scale (DGS)

Geriatric Depression Scale (DGS)

Intervention Type OTHER

MMSE

Mini Mental State Exam

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Men and woman between the ages of 60-85, inclusive
* Cognitive function/impairment within appropriate ranges for the study (Mini-Mental State Exam scores of 10-30, inclusive)

Exclusion Criteria

* Unable to complete computerized and standard pencil-and-paper based assessments
Minimum Eligible Age

60 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

85 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Pennington Biomedical Research Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Corby K. Martin

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Corby K Martin, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Pennington Biomedical Research Center

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Pennington Biomedical Research Center

Baton Rouge, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Brouillette RM, Foil H, Fontenot S, Correro A, Allen R, Martin CK, Bruce-Keller AJ, Keller JN. Feasibility, reliability, and validity of a smartphone based application for the assessment of cognitive function in the elderly. PLoS One. 2013 Jun 11;8(6):e65925. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0065925. Print 2013.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23776570 (View on PubMed)

Maerlender A, Flashman L, Kessler A, Kumbhani S, Greenwald R, Tosteson T, McAllister T. Examination of the construct validity of ImPACT computerized test, traditional, and experimental neuropsychological measures. Clin Neuropsychol. 2010 Nov;24(8):1309-25. doi: 10.1080/13854046.2010.516072. Epub 2010 Oct 4.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20924979 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

PBRC 2013-040

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Major Depressive Disorder (MDD)
NCT01662817 COMPLETED