Diagnostic Utility of Culdocentesis in Patients With a Suspicious Adnexal Mass

NCT ID: NCT02109367

Last Updated: 2024-04-09

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING

Total Enrollment

60 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-02-28

Study Completion Date

2024-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study involves women who are scheduled to have surgery for a pelvic or ovarian mass that is suspicious for epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). The physician will perform an additional procedure on all consented subjects known as 'culdocentesis'. This will be done just prior to their scheduled surgery while the patient is under general anesthesia. Culdocentesis is a procedure typically used to check for abnormal fluid in the space just behind the vagina. This pocket of space is called the cul-de-sac. The purpose of this study is to determine if levels of tumor markers, CA-125 and HE4, are measurable from the cul-de-sac fluid. If these tumor markers are measurable from the cul-de-sac fluid and correlate with the patient's diagnosis, this procedure may be used in the future as an additional diagnostic tool for EOC. In addition, a single urine sample will be collected from each patient to measure the ratio of "good" to "bad" estrogen. Investigators hypothesize this ratio will also correlate with EOC diagnosis. Study results could lead to development of an alternative, minimally invasive and low risk diagnostic tool in patients with an ovarian mass suspicious for malignancy.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This is a single cohort, exploratory pilot study of 60 participants to assess if ovarian cancer markers, cancer antigen-125 (CA-125) and human epididymis protein 4 (HE4), are measurable from cul-de-sac washings collected via culdocentesis. Immediately prior to the scheduled surgery, while the patient is under general anesthesia, a long, thin needle will be inserted through the wall of the vagina (just below the uterus) to access the cul-de-sac. A saline wash will then be performed and this fluid will be collected for analysis of tumor markers. CA-125 and HE4 levels will be compared to serum levels for correlation with a diagnosis of ovarian cancer. A urine sample will also be collected from this same cohort to measure estrogen metabolites. Estrogen metabolism is associated with cancer progression in estrogen sensitive tissues. Estrogen metabolites, 2-hydroxyestrone (2-OHE1) the "good" byproduct and 16α-hydroxyestrone (16α-OHE1) known as the "bad" byproduct, have been implicated in the development of breast cancer. Study investigators are proposing to expand the utility of this predictive ratio to ovarian cancer by measuring the potential imbalance of these metabolites.

If results indicate an association between cancer diagnosis and levels of CA-125 and HE4 or the ratio of estrogen metabolites from the urine, this could allow for a new minimally invasive, low-risk diagnostic modality for all suspected ovarian cancer cases. This would be particularly invaluable for patients at higher risk for poor surgical outcomes. Data from this pilot study will confirm the potential effect size needed to identify an optimal cut-point useful for the prediction of EOC within this study population.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Ovarian Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Pelvic mass

Women who present to the Gynecologic Oncology clinic with a pelvic mass who are scheduled to undergo surgical excision.

No interventions assigned to this group

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients age ≥ 30.
* Adnexal mass or suspected ovarian carcinoma.
* Patient has been scheduled for oophorectomy, bilateral salpingo- oophorectomy (BSO), hysterectomy, hysterectomy/BSO, staging or debulking.
* Willingness to sign an Informed Consent document.

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients previously diagnosed with a malignancy within the pelvis or abdomen.
* Patients in which culdocentesis is technically unfeasible due to previous surgery (extensive pelvic floor repair/colpocleisis) or other anatomic abnormalities that make the cul-de-sac inaccessible.
Minimum Eligible Age

30 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Institutes of Health (NIH)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

National Cancer Institute (NCI)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

Southern Illinois University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Laurent Brard, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Southern Illinois University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Southern Illinois University School of Medicine

Springfield, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Andersen MR, Goff BA, Lowe KA, Scholler N, Bergan L, Drescher CW, Paley P, Urban N. Use of a Symptom Index, CA125, and HE4 to predict ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2010 Mar;116(3):378-83. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2009.10.087. Epub 2009 Nov 28.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19945742 (View on PubMed)

Bast RC Jr. Status of tumor markers in ovarian cancer screening. J Clin Oncol. 2003 May 15;21(10 Suppl):200s-205s. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.01.068.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12743135 (View on PubMed)

Moore RG, Brown AK, Miller MC, Skates S, Allard WJ, Verch T, Steinhoff M, Messerlian G, DiSilvestro P, Granai CO, Bast RC Jr. The use of multiple novel tumor biomarkers for the detection of ovarian carcinoma in patients with a pelvic mass. Gynecol Oncol. 2008 Feb;108(2):402-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2007.10.017. Epub 2007 Dec 3.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18061248 (View on PubMed)

Partheen K, Kristjansdottir B, Sundfeldt K. Evaluation of ovarian cancer biomarkers HE4 and CA-125 in women presenting with a suspicious cystic ovarian mass. J Gynecol Oncol. 2011 Dec;22(4):244-52. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2011.22.4.244. Epub 2011 Dec 5.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22247801 (View on PubMed)

Sandri MT, Bottari F, Franchi D, Boveri S, Candiani M, Ronzoni S, Peiretti M, Radice D, Passerini R, Sideri M. Comparison of HE4, CA125 and ROMA algorithm in women with a pelvic mass: correlation with pathological outcome. Gynecol Oncol. 2013 Feb;128(2):233-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2012.11.026. Epub 2012 Nov 28.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23200911 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

1R03CA181907-01

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

BRARD-SIUSOM-14-001

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.