Predictors of Ovarian Cancer and Endometrial Cancer for Artificial-Intelligence-Based Screening Tools
NCT ID: NCT05697601
Last Updated: 2023-11-27
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
2905 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2023-02-28
2024-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The specific objectives of the study are
1. Elaborating the situation of ovarian and endometrial cancer in Indonesia
2. Exploring the possible clinical, demography and laboratory predictors of these diseases
3. Develop artificial-intelligence-based screening tools for both type of cancer based on possible predictors
This study will utilize the patient registry diagnosed with ovarian and endometrial cancer. We assumed that several demography, clinical, and laboratory predictors might possess good screening performance with higher sensitivity and specificity (\>80%).
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
This study will involve two different stages
1. The first stage will conduct a cohort study to identify the possible predictors of each type of cancer
2. The second stage will cover the development of point-of-care testing based on an artificial intelligence model to predict cancer occurrence and prospective testing of the new participants using a diagnostic study method. The tools will predict the current histopathology result and possible future histopathology within one year.
Participants and source of data In the study centre, women with or without gynaecology-associated symptoms underwent gynaecological and pathology assessments to rule out ovarian and endometrial cancer in our study centre were involved. Data is stored digitally and extraction will be done accordingly
Variables and outcome measurement
1. Demographic data and health data this information is obtained from the initial assessment of the patients including age, body mass index, chronic diseases, gynaecological and obstetric profile, menstrual pattern, and contraception
2. Clinical and laboratory data this include, a complete blood count, selected cancer-associated biomarker (for example Cancer Antigen 125 (Ca-125)), involvement of lymph node, histopathology of pertinent tissues, and signs of metastases through clinical or radiological data
3. Outcome final histopathology type and classification assessed by at least two pathologists to determine the type of cancer. The guidelines of classification follow the World Health Organization's classification
Development of Artificial-Intelligence-based screening tools
1. The researcher will develop
\- an information-based model where the user will provide a response to each predictor
\- an image-based model where the user will provide a captured image for prediction
\- a mixed-based model where the user can combine captured images and information for each predictor
2. proposed model
\- scoring-based derived from the coefficient of regression
\- decision tree
\- random forest
\- artificial neural network
* convolutional neural network
3. Selection of model
<!-- -->
1. Screening performance on split data (or using cross-validation technique)
2. evaluation of log-loss or likelihood
Timeline
1\. For the first stage of the study, there will be a time-varying assessment for each participant, however, at least participants undergo an Assessment of all factors and outcomes at baseline. Repeated evaluation as suggested by the physician will be done within one year after the baseline assessment.
2\. The second study will apply prospective screening. The artificial intelligence-based screening tool will be used concurrently with the gold standard of diagnosis.
Possible Bias procedural bias particularly in reliability outcome interpretation is handled by involving multiple pathologists. The pathologist and the screener will perform the screening independently to reduce the tendency of prior results provided by the newly-developed screening tools.
Sample size
1. The first stage of the research assumes that
a. The prevalence of both cancer among all cancers in women accounted for 5% b. Type I error set at 5% c. absolute error of the prevalence 1% using the one-sample proportion formula, the estimated sample size is 1825 participants.
2\. Following the diagnostic study, we state that the new screening tools model will show non-inferiority performance to histopathology as gold-standard, assuming that
a. the expected difference in sensitivity value is 5% assuming that the new screening tools will possess 85% sensitivity and the sensitivity of histopathology is 90% b. cross-over testing will be done, creating an equal allocation of screening intervention c. Type 1 error of the study set at 5% d. Power of the study set at 80% the total sample size for the prospective screening tool will be 1080 participants
Data Quantification and discretization several clinical information will be classified according to the established guideline for example body mass index.
Proposed Statistical Analysis
1. Descriptive statistic and bivariate analysis
2. A cox-regression will be conducted following the baseline-to-event timeline
3. Subgroup analysis will be done, particularly in certain demographic and comorbidity.
as for the second stage, the analysis will identify the
1. sensitivity
2. specificity
3. accuracy
4. precision
5. The number Needed to Treat selected models will be deployed into an application.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
RETROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Suspect of Ovarian Cancer
The participant with high suspicion of ovarian cancer and undergo gynaecology and pathology assessment
Artificial-Intelligence Based Screening Tools
Artificial-Intelligence Based Screening Tools build on machine learning models
Pathology analysis
Pathology assessment of cells and tissues from respective organs
Suspect of Endometrial Cancer
The participant with high suspicion of Endometrial cancer (and or endometrial hyperplasia) and undergo gynaecology and pathology assessment
Artificial-Intelligence Based Screening Tools
Artificial-Intelligence Based Screening Tools build on machine learning models
Pathology analysis
Pathology assessment of cells and tissues from respective organs
Normal Cohort
The participant with lower suspicion of both types of cancer and undergo gynaecology and pathology assessment
Artificial-Intelligence Based Screening Tools
Artificial-Intelligence Based Screening Tools build on machine learning models
Pathology analysis
Pathology assessment of cells and tissues from respective organs
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Artificial-Intelligence Based Screening Tools
Artificial-Intelligence Based Screening Tools build on machine learning models
Pathology analysis
Pathology assessment of cells and tissues from respective organs
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
1. Irregular menstruation
2. Heavy bleeding during menstruation
3. pelvic pain
4. vaginal discharge
5. sudden weight loss
6. pain during sexual intercourse
* Women who underwent routine gynaecological examination
Exclusion Criteria
FEMALE
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Chulalongkorn University
OTHER
Hasanuddin University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Bumi Herman
Assistant Lecturer
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Rina Masadah, Ph.D
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Hasanuddin University
Bumi Herman, Ph.D
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Chulalongkorn University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Hasanuddin University Hospital
Makassar, South Sulawesi, Indonesia
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Atallah GA, Abd Aziz NH, Teik CK, Shafiee MN, Kampan NC. New Predictive Biomarkers for Ovarian Cancer. Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 Mar 7;11(3):465. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11030465.
Elias KM, Guo J, Bast RC Jr. Early Detection of Ovarian Cancer. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am. 2018 Dec;32(6):903-914. doi: 10.1016/j.hoc.2018.07.003. Epub 2018 Sep 28.
Tanha K, Mottaghi A, Nojomi M, Moradi M, Rajabzadeh R, Lotfi S, Janani L. Investigation on factors associated with ovarian cancer: an umbrella review of systematic review and meta-analyses. J Ovarian Res. 2021 Nov 11;14(1):153. doi: 10.1186/s13048-021-00911-z.
Zhao J, Hu Y, Zhao Y, Chen D, Fang T, Ding M. Risk factors of endometrial cancer in patients with endometrial hyperplasia: implication for clinical treatments. BMC Womens Health. 2021 Aug 25;21(1):312. doi: 10.1186/s12905-021-01452-9.
Felix AS, Weissfeld JL, Stone RA, Bowser R, Chivukula M, Edwards RP, Linkov F. Factors associated with Type I and Type II endometrial cancer. Cancer Causes Control. 2010 Nov;21(11):1851-6. doi: 10.1007/s10552-010-9612-8. Epub 2010 Jul 14.
Herman B, Sirichokchatchawan W, Pongpanich S, Nantasenamat C. Development and performance of CUHAS-ROBUST application for pulmonary rifampicin-resistance tuberculosis screening in Indonesia. PLoS One. 2021 Mar 25;16(3):e0249243. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249243. eCollection 2021.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
0901231327
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id