Predictors of Ovarian Cancer and Endometrial Cancer for Artificial-Intelligence-Based Screening Tools

NCT ID: NCT05697601

Last Updated: 2023-11-27

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Total Enrollment

2905 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-02-28

Study Completion Date

2024-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The goal of this observational study is to explore the possible associated factors of ovarian cancer and endometrial cancer in Indonesia and develop screening tools that could predict the risk of both types of cancer

The specific objectives of the study are

1. Elaborating the situation of ovarian and endometrial cancer in Indonesia
2. Exploring the possible clinical, demography and laboratory predictors of these diseases
3. Develop artificial-intelligence-based screening tools for both type of cancer based on possible predictors

This study will utilize the patient registry diagnosed with ovarian and endometrial cancer. We assumed that several demography, clinical, and laboratory predictors might possess good screening performance with higher sensitivity and specificity (\>80%).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Methodology :

This study will involve two different stages

1. The first stage will conduct a cohort study to identify the possible predictors of each type of cancer
2. The second stage will cover the development of point-of-care testing based on an artificial intelligence model to predict cancer occurrence and prospective testing of the new participants using a diagnostic study method. The tools will predict the current histopathology result and possible future histopathology within one year.

Participants and source of data In the study centre, women with or without gynaecology-associated symptoms underwent gynaecological and pathology assessments to rule out ovarian and endometrial cancer in our study centre were involved. Data is stored digitally and extraction will be done accordingly

Variables and outcome measurement

1. Demographic data and health data this information is obtained from the initial assessment of the patients including age, body mass index, chronic diseases, gynaecological and obstetric profile, menstrual pattern, and contraception
2. Clinical and laboratory data this include, a complete blood count, selected cancer-associated biomarker (for example Cancer Antigen 125 (Ca-125)), involvement of lymph node, histopathology of pertinent tissues, and signs of metastases through clinical or radiological data
3. Outcome final histopathology type and classification assessed by at least two pathologists to determine the type of cancer. The guidelines of classification follow the World Health Organization's classification

Development of Artificial-Intelligence-based screening tools

1. The researcher will develop

\- an information-based model where the user will provide a response to each predictor

\- an image-based model where the user will provide a captured image for prediction

\- a mixed-based model where the user can combine captured images and information for each predictor
2. proposed model

\- scoring-based derived from the coefficient of regression

\- decision tree

\- random forest

\- artificial neural network
* convolutional neural network
3. Selection of model

<!-- -->

1. Screening performance on split data (or using cross-validation technique)
2. evaluation of log-loss or likelihood

Timeline

1\. For the first stage of the study, there will be a time-varying assessment for each participant, however, at least participants undergo an Assessment of all factors and outcomes at baseline. Repeated evaluation as suggested by the physician will be done within one year after the baseline assessment.

2\. The second study will apply prospective screening. The artificial intelligence-based screening tool will be used concurrently with the gold standard of diagnosis.

Possible Bias procedural bias particularly in reliability outcome interpretation is handled by involving multiple pathologists. The pathologist and the screener will perform the screening independently to reduce the tendency of prior results provided by the newly-developed screening tools.

Sample size
1. The first stage of the research assumes that

a. The prevalence of both cancer among all cancers in women accounted for 5% b. Type I error set at 5% c. absolute error of the prevalence 1% using the one-sample proportion formula, the estimated sample size is 1825 participants.

2\. Following the diagnostic study, we state that the new screening tools model will show non-inferiority performance to histopathology as gold-standard, assuming that

a. the expected difference in sensitivity value is 5% assuming that the new screening tools will possess 85% sensitivity and the sensitivity of histopathology is 90% b. cross-over testing will be done, creating an equal allocation of screening intervention c. Type 1 error of the study set at 5% d. Power of the study set at 80% the total sample size for the prospective screening tool will be 1080 participants

Data Quantification and discretization several clinical information will be classified according to the established guideline for example body mass index.

Proposed Statistical Analysis

1. Descriptive statistic and bivariate analysis
2. A cox-regression will be conducted following the baseline-to-event timeline
3. Subgroup analysis will be done, particularly in certain demographic and comorbidity.

as for the second stage, the analysis will identify the

1. sensitivity
2. specificity
3. accuracy
4. precision
5. The number Needed to Treat selected models will be deployed into an application.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Ovarian Cancer Endometrial Cancer Endometrial Hyperplasia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

RETROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Suspect of Ovarian Cancer

The participant with high suspicion of ovarian cancer and undergo gynaecology and pathology assessment

Artificial-Intelligence Based Screening Tools

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Artificial-Intelligence Based Screening Tools build on machine learning models

Pathology analysis

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Pathology assessment of cells and tissues from respective organs

Suspect of Endometrial Cancer

The participant with high suspicion of Endometrial cancer (and or endometrial hyperplasia) and undergo gynaecology and pathology assessment

Artificial-Intelligence Based Screening Tools

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Artificial-Intelligence Based Screening Tools build on machine learning models

Pathology analysis

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Pathology assessment of cells and tissues from respective organs

Normal Cohort

The participant with lower suspicion of both types of cancer and undergo gynaecology and pathology assessment

Artificial-Intelligence Based Screening Tools

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Artificial-Intelligence Based Screening Tools build on machine learning models

Pathology analysis

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Pathology assessment of cells and tissues from respective organs

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Artificial-Intelligence Based Screening Tools

Artificial-Intelligence Based Screening Tools build on machine learning models

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Pathology analysis

Pathology assessment of cells and tissues from respective organs

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Women with gynaecological symptoms but not limited to

1. Irregular menstruation
2. Heavy bleeding during menstruation
3. pelvic pain
4. vaginal discharge
5. sudden weight loss
6. pain during sexual intercourse
* Women who underwent routine gynaecological examination

Exclusion Criteria

* unable to undergo serial gynaecological follow-up
Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Chulalongkorn University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Hasanuddin University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Bumi Herman

Assistant Lecturer

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Rina Masadah, Ph.D

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Hasanuddin University

Bumi Herman, Ph.D

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Chulalongkorn University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Hasanuddin University Hospital

Makassar, South Sulawesi, Indonesia

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Indonesia

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Bumi Herman, Ph.D

Role: CONTACT

+66638275008

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Bumi Herman, M.D, Ph.D

Role: primary

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Atallah GA, Abd Aziz NH, Teik CK, Shafiee MN, Kampan NC. New Predictive Biomarkers for Ovarian Cancer. Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 Mar 7;11(3):465. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11030465.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 33800113 (View on PubMed)

Elias KM, Guo J, Bast RC Jr. Early Detection of Ovarian Cancer. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am. 2018 Dec;32(6):903-914. doi: 10.1016/j.hoc.2018.07.003. Epub 2018 Sep 28.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30390764 (View on PubMed)

Tanha K, Mottaghi A, Nojomi M, Moradi M, Rajabzadeh R, Lotfi S, Janani L. Investigation on factors associated with ovarian cancer: an umbrella review of systematic review and meta-analyses. J Ovarian Res. 2021 Nov 11;14(1):153. doi: 10.1186/s13048-021-00911-z.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 34758846 (View on PubMed)

Zhao J, Hu Y, Zhao Y, Chen D, Fang T, Ding M. Risk factors of endometrial cancer in patients with endometrial hyperplasia: implication for clinical treatments. BMC Womens Health. 2021 Aug 25;21(1):312. doi: 10.1186/s12905-021-01452-9.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 34433451 (View on PubMed)

Felix AS, Weissfeld JL, Stone RA, Bowser R, Chivukula M, Edwards RP, Linkov F. Factors associated with Type I and Type II endometrial cancer. Cancer Causes Control. 2010 Nov;21(11):1851-6. doi: 10.1007/s10552-010-9612-8. Epub 2010 Jul 14.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20628804 (View on PubMed)

Herman B, Sirichokchatchawan W, Pongpanich S, Nantasenamat C. Development and performance of CUHAS-ROBUST application for pulmonary rifampicin-resistance tuberculosis screening in Indonesia. PLoS One. 2021 Mar 25;16(3):e0249243. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249243. eCollection 2021.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 33765092 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

0901231327

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id