Occupational Therapy Modulates the Pain in Cancer Patient Under Palliative Care
NCT ID: NCT02102178
Last Updated: 2014-04-02
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE2
58 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2007-07-31
2008-11-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
There is evidence that non-pharmacological therapeutic activities are useful for controlling oncological pain and other symptoms resulting from such diseases.
This study evaluated the results relating to pain modulation and improvement of emotional symptoms and quality of life, from an occupational therapy program applied to oncological patients who were receiving palliative care.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment in Oncology Patients' Management
NCT03142386
Occupational Therapy for Cancer Patients: a Randomised, Controlled Study
NCT01432197
Occupational Therapy in Palliative Care
NCT02521194
The Effectiveness of Cancer Pain Management in Siriraj Outpatient Pain Clinic
NCT03474406
The Effectiveness of Progressive Muscle Relaxation Technique in Reducing Cancer-related Pain
NCT04436705
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The role and interventions of occupational therapy within palliative care are wide-ranging and challenging, with a vocation to help individuals to value the remainder of their lives and live for the present moment in the best way possible, through providing options for them to keep themselves in a physical and emotional condition that allows them to carry out activities that would be gratifying and stimulating. The effects from this will assist them in preparing for the end of life with more dignity and respect.
The relevance of occupational therapy interventions in relation to oncology and, in particular, palliative care has been little studied. However, it is known that this may contribute towards improving the quality of life in interpersonal relationships and diminishing pain and distress, through providing guidance regarding activities of daily living and through the use of therapeutic activities, especially in relation to hospitalization processes.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Group 1 (Intensive occupational therapy)
All patients received pharmacological treatment for pain in accordance with the World Health Organization (WHO)'s analgesic ladder and occupational therapy follow-up, with guidance regarding activities of daily living (ADLs).
They also carried out therapeutic activities such as embroidery onto gauze (tapestry), weaving a scarf on a nail frame and playing dominos.
Tapestry
A gauze screen, wool thread appropriate for tapestry and a large needle were used.
The entire screen was filled with a striped pattern made of embroidered half-stitches in the individuals' preferred colors. To fill the screen with half-stitches, the needle was always worked in diagonal movements, point to point. The stitches were started keeping a distance of three points from the four edges.
Regular occupation therapy
All the patients were followed up daily for 10 days by a single occupational therapist for around 30 minutes, during which they received guidance regarding how best to perform their ADLs, i.e. how to position themselves when sitting down and standing up, dressing and undressing, feeding themselves, performing personal hygiene and undertaking leisure activities, with the aim of protecting their joints, reducing the pain and expending less energy.
Weaving a scarf on a nail frame
Weaving a scarf on a nail frame: this activity used a rectangular wooden frame (30 cm x 10 cm), with an empty space in the middle and nails distributed at 1 cm intervals along all sides, together with a crochet needle and wool thread.
Procedure: The thread was measured out on the frame and all the fringes were cut to the same length. After this, each thread was knotted, leaving a loop that was placed over each nail. A wool thread was tied to the nail at the corner and a zigzag pattern was woven between alternate nails. On the return, the zigzag weave went via the nails that had initially been missed out. Using the crochet needle, the loop of the fringe was pulled across on top of the zigzag. The scarf went on coming out from under the frame. The zigzag sequence and the needle movement were repeated until the scarf reached the desired length.
Domino game
Each player received seven dominos and kept them concealed from the adversaries' eyes. The player with the double-six (domino with the number six at both ends) started the game. If this domino had not been dealt out to any player, the one with the highest double domino started. Following on from this first player, in clockwise direction, each subsequent player placed one domino at one of the ends of the chain that was formed as the dominos were played. If a player did not have a domino that could be played, he would go to the pile and keep on picking up dominos until getting one that would fit. If no such domino existed, the player would then pass his turn on to the next player. The first player to get rid of all his dominos was the winner. If the game became "blocked", i.e. there was no longer any possibility of adding dominos to the chain, the points in each player's hand were counted and the winner was the one with the lowest number of points in his hand.
Group 2 (Regular occupation therapy)
All patients received pharmacological treatment for pain in according to WHO's analgesic ladder and only guidance regarding ADLs from the occupational therapist.
Regular occupation therapy
All the patients were followed up daily for 10 days by a single occupational therapist for around 30 minutes, during which they received guidance regarding how best to perform their ADLs, i.e. how to position themselves when sitting down and standing up, dressing and undressing, feeding themselves, performing personal hygiene and undertaking leisure activities, with the aim of protecting their joints, reducing the pain and expending less energy.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Tapestry
A gauze screen, wool thread appropriate for tapestry and a large needle were used.
The entire screen was filled with a striped pattern made of embroidered half-stitches in the individuals' preferred colors. To fill the screen with half-stitches, the needle was always worked in diagonal movements, point to point. The stitches were started keeping a distance of three points from the four edges.
Regular occupation therapy
All the patients were followed up daily for 10 days by a single occupational therapist for around 30 minutes, during which they received guidance regarding how best to perform their ADLs, i.e. how to position themselves when sitting down and standing up, dressing and undressing, feeding themselves, performing personal hygiene and undertaking leisure activities, with the aim of protecting their joints, reducing the pain and expending less energy.
Weaving a scarf on a nail frame
Weaving a scarf on a nail frame: this activity used a rectangular wooden frame (30 cm x 10 cm), with an empty space in the middle and nails distributed at 1 cm intervals along all sides, together with a crochet needle and wool thread.
Procedure: The thread was measured out on the frame and all the fringes were cut to the same length. After this, each thread was knotted, leaving a loop that was placed over each nail. A wool thread was tied to the nail at the corner and a zigzag pattern was woven between alternate nails. On the return, the zigzag weave went via the nails that had initially been missed out. Using the crochet needle, the loop of the fringe was pulled across on top of the zigzag. The scarf went on coming out from under the frame. The zigzag sequence and the needle movement were repeated until the scarf reached the desired length.
Domino game
Each player received seven dominos and kept them concealed from the adversaries' eyes. The player with the double-six (domino with the number six at both ends) started the game. If this domino had not been dealt out to any player, the one with the highest double domino started. Following on from this first player, in clockwise direction, each subsequent player placed one domino at one of the ends of the chain that was formed as the dominos were played. If a player did not have a domino that could be played, he would go to the pile and keep on picking up dominos until getting one that would fit. If no such domino existed, the player would then pass his turn on to the next player. The first player to get rid of all his dominos was the winner. If the game became "blocked", i.e. there was no longer any possibility of adding dominos to the chain, the points in each player's hand were counted and the winner was the one with the lowest number of points in his hand.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* advanced neoplasia without therapeutic possibilities for cure
* intensity of pain greater than or equal to 5 on the 10-centimeter VAS.
* expected to live for more than three months,
* Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) of between 40 and 70%
* Patients not candidate to palliative and antalgic chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy.
* Patients or their legal representatives must be able to read, understand and provide written informed consent to participate in the study.
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients admitted to hospital for pain control in situations considered to be pain emergencies such as bone fracture, infection, medullary compression or metastasis in the central nervous system
* Patients with poor cognitive capacity (unable to understand the research questionnaires)
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Barretos Cancer Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Natasha Takeda, Occupational Therapy
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Barretos Cancer Hospital
Maria Salete A. Nascimento, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Barretos Cancer Hospital
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Kasven-Gonzalez N, Souverain R, Miale S. Improving quality of life through rehabilitation in palliative care: case report. Palliat Support Care. 2010 Sep;8(3):359-69. doi: 10.1017/S1478951510000167.
Sviden GA, Tham K, Borell L. Involvement in everyday life for people with a life threatening illness. Palliat Support Care. 2010 Sep;8(3):345-52. doi: 10.1017/S1478951510000143.
Halkett GK, Ciccarelli M, Keesing S, Aoun S. Occupational therapy in palliative care: is it under-utilised in Western Australia? Aust Occup Ther J. 2010 Oct;57(5):301-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1630.2009.00843.x.
Meredith PJ. Has undergraduate education prepared occupational therapy students for possible practice in palliative care? Aust Occup Ther J. 2010 Aug;57(4):224-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1630.2009.00836.x.
Kumano K, Matsuda N, Matsumoto H, Noguchi A, Tada Y, Koezuka M, Sano K, Kasamatu Y. [The role of occupational therapist in Palliative Care Team]. Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 2010 Sep;37(9):1825-7. No abstract available. Japanese.
Kuhara S, Kakou H, Tokuo M, Nogami M, Takemura J, Hachisuka K. [Palliative rehabilitation of two patients with terminal stage cancer: a visit to patient's home and the provision of advice by a nurse and rehabilitation staff members before discharge--from physical therapist's perspective]. J UOEH. 2009 Dec 1;31(4):359-64. doi: 10.7888/juoeh.31.359. Japanese.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
7683857344959085
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.