Reinforcement of the Abdominal Wall After Breast Reconstruction With the Pedicled TRAM-flap

NCT ID: NCT02076724

Last Updated: 2020-01-09

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

29 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-03-31

Study Completion Date

2019-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to compare two methods for reinforcement of the abdominal donor-site after breast reconstruction with the pedicled TRAM-flap. Reinforcement of the abdominal donor-site is performed, after randomization, with either a porcine derived biological mesh or a synthetic mesh. The patient and the investigator is blinded.

The aim is to identify the most optimal method for reinforcement of the abdominal donor-site and thereby contribute to fast and complete rehabilitation of women undergoing breast reconstruction with the pedicled TRAM-flap after surgical removal of the breast tissue due to breast cancer, precursors to breast cancer or an increased risk of developing breast cancer and thereby following preventive removal of the breast tissue.

The patients visit the outpatient clinic 4, 12 and 24 months after operation and abdominal wall function, the donor site morbidity, the frequency of postoperative complications, the aesthetic appearance of the reconstructed breast and the abdominal wall and costs are evaluated.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Abdominal Donor-site

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Biological mesh (Strattice Firm)

Strattice Firm is inserted using inlay technique as reinforcement of the abdominal wall where the anterior rectus fascia has been excised.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Biological mesh

Intervention Type DEVICE

Synthetic mesh (Prolene)

Prolene mesh is inserted using inlay technique as reinforcement of the abdominal wall where the anterior rectus fascia has been excised.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Synthetic mesh

Intervention Type DEVICE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Biological mesh

Intervention Type DEVICE

Synthetic mesh

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Strattice Reconstructive Tissue Matrix Firm, LifeCell Corp. Prolene mesh, Ethicon

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Immediate or delayed breast reconstruction using the pedicled TRAM-flap
* Older than 18 years of age
* Understand enough Danish to comprehend the given information and to complete the study questionnaire
* Verbal and written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

* Current smokers
* Not eligible patients, assessed by surgeon
* High level of co-morbidity, assessed by surgeon or anesthesiologist
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

LifeCell

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Novo Nordisk A/S

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Aarhus

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Aarhus University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Mette Eline Brunbjerg, MD

MD

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Mette Eline Brunbjerg, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Aarhus University Hospital and Aarhus University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital

Aarhus C, Aarhus, Denmark

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Denmark

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

VEK 1-10-72-10-13

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.