Optical Biopsy to Improve the Diagnosis of Kidney Cancer

NCT ID: NCT02073110

Last Updated: 2014-02-27

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Total Enrollment

194 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2013-08-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Data from the American Cancer Society shows a 70% increase in incidence of kidney and renal pelvis cancer between 2000 and 2010. This increase is attributed to small renal masses (SRM) that are incidentally discovered by abdominal radiological imaging. However, 30% of resected SRMs appear benign on histological examination. Conventional biopsy is currently used to provide pathological information prior to resection. However, its non-diagnostic value is high, up to 33% in SRMs, showing the need for diagnostic improvement.

The investigators have shown that optical biopsy (OB) can differentiate malignant from benign tissue and tumor subtypes. However, translation to the clinic requires a phase 2 clinical study. The investigators will use an OB probe that can be combined with a needle puncture during classical biopsy procedures, additionally providing real time micro-scale images containing quantitative information about tissue properties. The investigators are convinced that OB will greatly improve the diagnosis of renal tumor pathology.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Rationale:

Renal biopsies can be used in patients with renal mass lesions to diagnose whether it concerns a malignant or benign mass. In case of malignancy, surgery will be the following step. However, 7 to 33% of biopsies are non-diagnostic, what can result in unnecessary surgery (even up to 30% in small renal masses). The investigators think that optical biopsy (OB), a new diagnostic tool based on the absorption en reflection of light in tissues, reduces the non-diagnostic biopsy rate. This could have a direct impact on the quality of life of the patients that are therefore scheduled for an unnecessary surgical procedure. Also, concerns about overtreatment have led to the concept of focal therapy, a selective patient tailored nephron sparing surgical or ablation technique of a lesion, reducing lifetime morbidity and side effects without compromising life expectancy. For this novel form of treatment, accurate identification, grading and demarcation of a lesion is crucial and OB is the ideal platform to provide this approach to an improved cure.

Objectives:

Primary

\- The accuracy of DRS and OCT in the diagnostic of renal malignancy

Secondary

* The accuracy of DRS and OCT in the diagnostic of renal malignancy and in distinguishing among the 3 main RCC subtypes
* The accuracy of the combination of the DRS and OCT

Study design:

This is a prospective, observational, multi-centre in-vivo study.

Study population:

Patients ≥ 18 years of age, with a solid enhancing renal mass suspected for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and candidates for active (surgical) treatment of the renal mass.

Intervention:

Patients will receive an ultrasound guided percutaneous OB followed by a Core biopsy (CB) during the same procedure. The planned institutional surgical protocol will be followed irrespective of the results of OB and CB. During surgery (radical/partial, open/laparoscopic, percutaneous ablation) a new set of DRS and OCT measurements of the tumor and normal tissue will be performed.

Main study parameters/endpoints:

1. To determine the accuracy of OB to differentiate renal tumor pathology from benign tissue by means of minimal invasive quantitative DRS and OCT.
2. To determine the differentiation capability of OCT this combined technique to distinguish between the three most common RCC sub-types.
3. To determine whether OB is a good alternative to the percutaneous biopsy for diagnosing renal cancer.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Kidney Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

CASE_ONLY

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

≥ 18 years, solid enhancing renal mass suspected for RCC

Percutaneous Optical Biopsy (OCT and DRS)

Intervention Type DEVICE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Percutaneous Optical Biopsy (OCT and DRS)

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age ≥ 18 years
* Solid, enhancing mass on cross sectional imaging suspect for RCC
* Scheduled for total or partial nephrectomy or for laparoscopic cryoablation.
* Signed informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients with a renal mass that are not candidates for active treatment will be excluded from the study
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

P.G.K. Wagstaff

MD.

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

MP Laguna Pes, MD. PhD.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)

JJMCH de la Rosette, MD. PhD.

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Free University Medical Center

Amsterdam, , Netherlands

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Academic Medical Center

Amsterdam, , Netherlands

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Netherlands

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

MP Laguna Pes, MD. PhD.

Role: CONTACT

+31205666928

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

RJA van Moorselaar, MD. PhD.

Role: primary

+31204440272

MP Laguna Pes, MD. PhD.

Role: primary

+31205666928

Peter Wagstaff, MD.

Role: backup

+31205666493

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Buijs M, Wagstaff PGK, de Bruin DM, Zondervan PJ, Savci-Heijink CD, van Delden OM, van Leeuwen TG, van Moorselaar RJA, de la Rosette JJMCH, Laguna Pes MP. An In-vivo Prospective Study of the Diagnostic Yield and Accuracy of Optical Biopsy Compared with Conventional Renal Mass Biopsy for the Diagnosis of Renal Cell Carcinoma: The Interim Analysis. Eur Urol Focus. 2018 Dec;4(6):978-985. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2017.10.002. Epub 2017 Oct 24.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 29079496 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

NL41985.018.12

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

NANOTECH RCC Biomarkers
NCT02923284 COMPLETED