A Study to Evaluate a Quality Improvement Intervention to Reduce Wound Separation Rates in Obese Gynecologic Oncology Service Patients Undergoing Abdominal Surgery
NCT ID: NCT02071251
Last Updated: 2015-08-25
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE2
105 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2011-12-31
2013-07-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Effectiveness of Wound Drains for the Prevention Of Surgical sITe infectION
NCT05179122
Surgical Site Infection Rate After Intra-Abdominal Surgery Using Negative Pressure Wound Therapy at Initial Closure
NCT01924884
Prevention of Wound Complications After Cesarean Delivery in Obese Women Utilizing Negative Pressure Wound Therapy
NCT00654641
Randomized Clinical Trial of Skin Closure With Staples Versus Suture
NCT01977612
Prophylactic Incisional Care in Obese Women at Cesarean
NCT02578745
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Prospective intervention
The skin and subcutaneous tissues were incised using a scalpel or cutting electrocautery. Use of coagulation current on the skin or subcutaneous tissues was not allowed, except focally to attain hemostasis. At the conclusion of surgery, a 7mm Jackson-Pratt drain was placed below Camper's fascia, which in turn was closed with 3-0 plain catgut suture. The skin was closed with staples. Dressings were retained for at least twenty-four hours. Staples were to be retained for at least two weeks.
Prospective wound complication protocol
The skin and subcutaneous tissues were incised using a scalpel or cutting electrocautery. Use of coagulation current on the skin or subcutaneous tissues was not allowed, except focally to attain hemostasis. At the conclusion of surgery, a 7mm Jackson-Pratt drain was placed below Camper's fascia, which in turn was closed with 3-0 plain catgut suture. The skin was closed with staples. Dressings were retained for at least twenty-four hours. Staples were to be retained for at least two weeks.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Prospective wound complication protocol
The skin and subcutaneous tissues were incised using a scalpel or cutting electrocautery. Use of coagulation current on the skin or subcutaneous tissues was not allowed, except focally to attain hemostasis. At the conclusion of surgery, a 7mm Jackson-Pratt drain was placed below Camper's fascia, which in turn was closed with 3-0 plain catgut suture. The skin was closed with staples. Dressings were retained for at least twenty-four hours. Staples were to be retained for at least two weeks.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
89 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Washington University School of Medicine
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Akiva P Novetsky, MD, MS
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Washington University School of Medicine
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Washington University School of Medicine and Barnes Jewish Hospital
St Louis, Missouri, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Bratzler DW, Houck PM; Surgical Infection Prevention Guideline Writers Workgroup. Antimicrobial prophylaxis for surgery: an advisory statement from the National Surgical Infection Prevention Project. Am J Surg. 2005 Apr;189(4):395-404. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2005.01.015.
Darouiche RO, Wall MJ Jr, Itani KM, Otterson MF, Webb AL, Carrick MM, Miller HJ, Awad SS, Crosby CT, Mosier MC, Alsharif A, Berger DH. Chlorhexidine-Alcohol versus Povidone-Iodine for Surgical-Site Antisepsis. N Engl J Med. 2010 Jan 7;362(1):18-26. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0810988.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
201108303
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.